Hormone Therapy (ADT) when ArteraAI Test says it's not necessary
My background: 67 years old; physically fit; not over weight; no diabetes; diagnosed in January 2026 with a Gleason of 7 (4+3); no metastasis shown (PET scan); PSA ~8.
[Please bear with this preamble. It's relavent.] I was originally seen by a surgical oncologist at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore. He recommended radical prostatectomy. I was on board with it, but read more about good outcomes with fewer side effects of proton therapy, so I got a referral to a radiology oncologist (RO) at JH. She said I'd be a good candidate for proton therapy, and offered me treatment at JH's proton therapy location in D.C. (an hour away) or at UofMD Medical Center in Baltimore (20 minutes away). For the recommended 5-1/2 weeks of daily (M-F) treatments, the latter was the obvious choice. Have met with UMMC ROs.
Part of UMMC's treatment plan is 4-6 months of hormone therapy (ADT), either Lupron shots or Orgovyx pills. However, the JH RO had submitted my biopsy and test results for ArteraAI analysis. The results came back and her recommendation was "low risk of metastases and not likely to benefit from hormone therapy. Therefore we would not recommend ADT with radiation."
The JH RO followed up by saying that UofMD was being conservative and that she didn't diagree with doing ADT, but stood by the ArteraAI results and still didn't think ADT was necessary. Of course, I want this cancer gone, but I don't want to deal with ADT side effects (in addition to the many others I will endure) if not really necessary.
So, has anyone in a similar situation opted out of ADT and had good outcomes or wished they had gone ahead with ADT? Are ADT side effects bearable? Any firsthand opinions on the ArteraAI testing? Thank you.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

Maybe I misremember what Arterra recommends. I thought it was whether a second drug abiraterone (Zytiga) would be of benefit if added to the primary ADT agent. About 25% are recommended to take it; whereas about 75% would not benefit from adding to the primary ADT drug.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@thmssllvn
If you are on ADT alone for more than a year, it increases your chance of becoming Castrate resistant. If you add a drug like abiraterone or a lutamide That can extend the amount of time It takes.
Is ADT keeping you undetectable?
@thmssllvn For Gleason 8 or above that is what it does. For Gleason 7 (3+4 and 4+3) it is if there is short-term ADT benefit based on unspecified biomarkers. For Gleason 6 and 3+4 there is a statement if active surveillance is appropriate.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@jeffmarc Curious, Jeff…didn’t Dr Weisserug prove to you that notion to be false in an email he sent you?That being on ADT early prevents castrate resistant clones from developing? And that long term ADT does not automatically cause castrate resistance?
He has been on Estradiol patch for like 16 yrs and is doing well so far…thoughts? Best,
Phil
@heavyphil
He said essentially that the cancer cells will accumulate and get hit by cosmic rays and then convert to resistance.
It makes me think that when you are on ADT some cells still accumulate but if you are on estradiol, you don’t have that problem. I don’t know if that is true, I do know the few people that I know of that are on estradiol do not have a problem yet. And some people that were on ADT for many years alone, didn’t have that problem.
I do know that I was on only ADT for 2 1/2 years and became castrate resistant. Something happened to those cells. Predictions of how soon somebody will become castrate resistant after being on ADT alone say, it’s a median of two years.
@jeffmarc OK, that’s interesting…but I think in your case the BRCA mutation pretty much makes your cancer aggressive which then leads to castrate resistance; I’ve read some studies - I’m sure you have read them all - where men are first tested for BRCA only because ADT stopped working; once they were found to have the mutation they were placed on PARP inhibitors.
Are you on one?
I think you were on Zytiga or Nubeqa but those aren’t PARP inhibitors. Thanks!
Phil
@heavyphil
When I became castrate resistant to ADT, they did not know I had BRCA2. so I was put on Casodex for 15 months and then Zytiga. After 2 1/2 years, I switched to Nubeqa. I did take a PARP inhibitor for about five days, Then I spoke to my oncologist and said, This doesn’t make sense why aren’t I on Nubeqa, And she agreed to put me on it. Since it is work so well, there’s no need for me to be on a PARP until after it fails.
I found out I was BRCA2 in March 2022 while I was on Zytiga.
The side effects of the PARP are pretty serious so I really would like to avoid it as long as possible.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@jeffmarc Well that’s great that the Nubeqa works, but it IS weird that it does, right?
I mean, if you are castrate resistant, none of the current hormone blockers should work at all.
Have they given you any explanation for this or is it just a stroke of good luck? Rather be lucky than good any day of the week!😉
Phil
Hi,
From what others have done it’s kinda standard procedure to put someone on an ADT drugs before radiation and then for sometime after radiation. The ADT weakens the cancer. Why not go with one of the newer ADT drugs like Orgovyx which typically has fewer side effects than drugs like Lupron. Plus the Orgovyx is a daily pill and not a six months shot so if the side effects do become unbearable you can stop the daily pill. No two people react to ADT the same, side effects do vary from person to person.
Dave 3+4
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 Reactions@brianjarvis Thanks. Good information, especially with us having similar situations. I will go ahead with the hormone therapy, maybe 4 months (the lower end of the time span they quoted) unless they tell me something that makes 6 months necessary.
They also offered participation in a strength training study which would be a couple of days per week during proton therapy visits. I'll definitely join that.
The other side effects I'm referring to are from placement of the spacer and markers (sounds similar to the biopsy), so discomfort afterward, blood in stool, urine, semen, etc. The possible side effects of the radiation treatment itself, like fatigue, urinary issues, erectile issues. Then side effects of brachytherapy (again, similar to biopsy). And all of the longer-term side effects that are possible, including those above.
My JH RO, who was my first RO, convinced me that the ArteraAI test results were solid, so that's what I've had in my mind all along. So if I really didn't need to deal with the side effects of ADT, so much the better. But now I'm convinced "better safe than sorry."
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions