Hormone Therapy (ADT) when ArteraAI Test says it's not necessary

Posted by tjnoffy @tjnoffy, May 12 8:15am

My background: 67 years old; physically fit; not over weight; no diabetes; diagnosed in January 2026 with a Gleason of 7 (4+3); no metastasis shown (PET scan); PSA ~8.

[Please bear with this preamble. It's relavent.] I was originally seen by a surgical oncologist at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore. He recommended radical prostatectomy. I was on board with it, but read more about good outcomes with fewer side effects of proton therapy, so I got a referral to a radiology oncologist (RO) at JH. She said I'd be a good candidate for proton therapy, and offered me treatment at JH's proton therapy location in D.C. (an hour away) or at UofMD Medical Center in Baltimore (20 minutes away). For the recommended 5-1/2 weeks of daily (M-F) treatments, the latter was the obvious choice. Have met with UMMC ROs.

Part of UMMC's treatment plan is 4-6 months of hormone therapy (ADT), either Lupron shots or Orgovyx pills. However, the JH RO had submitted my biopsy and test results for ArteraAI analysis. The results came back and her recommendation was "low risk of metastases and not likely to benefit from hormone therapy. Therefore we would not recommend ADT with radiation."

The JH RO followed up by saying that UofMD was being conservative and that she didn't diagree with doing ADT, but stood by the ArteraAI results and still didn't think ADT was necessary. Of course, I want this cancer gone, but I don't want to deal with ADT side effects (in addition to the many others I will endure) if not really necessary.

So, has anyone in a similar situation opted out of ADT and had good outcomes or wished they had gone ahead with ADT? Are ADT side effects bearable? Any firsthand opinions on the ArteraAI testing? Thank you.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@jeffmarc Well that’s great that the Nubeqa works, but it IS weird that it does, right?
I mean, if you are castrate resistant, none of the current hormone blockers should work at all.
Have they given you any explanation for this or is it just a stroke of good luck? Rather be lucky than good any day of the week!😉
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil
I was castrate resistant to ADT. That doesn’t make me resistant to the other drugs. It’s interesting that Zytiga helped, Though my PSA was only undetectable one month out of 2 1/2 years. Since its big deal is it reduces testosterone even more, it’s no wonder it didn’t work 100%. When I was on Casodex for the first 15 months, my PSA just kept rising, slowly.

Darolutamide works completely different so it’s not surprising that it did work. When I become resistant to it, I will be completely castrate resistant.

REPLY

I had to look this up (I'm still learning) and read up on castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). I'm sorry that you are going through this and hope that the Darolutamide continues to work for you. 🙏

REPLY
Profile picture for thmssllvn @thmssllvn

Maybe I misremember what Arterra recommends. I thought it was whether a second drug abiraterone (Zytiga) would be of benefit if added to the primary ADT agent. About 25% are recommended to take it; whereas about 75% would not benefit from adding to the primary ADT drug.

Jump to this post

@thmssllvn The AteraAI may recommend many things, but the context for me was whether ADT was necessary given all of my metrics. That's really all I know. As I'm learning, no answers on any of this are definite, so I maybe got my hopes up about skipping ADT. But if it gives me even an iota of benefit, it sounds like it's worth it.

REPLY
Profile picture for clevelandguy @clevelandguy

Hi,
From what others have done it’s kinda standard procedure to put someone on an ADT drugs before radiation and then for sometime after radiation. The ADT weakens the cancer. Why not go with one of the newer ADT drugs like Orgovyx which typically has fewer side effects than drugs like Lupron. Plus the Orgovyx is a daily pill and not a six months shot so if the side effects do become unbearable you can stop the daily pill. No two people react to ADT the same, side effects do vary from person to person.
Dave 3+4

Jump to this post

@clevelandguy Yes, when I met with the team at UMMC, their descriptions of the ADT drugs made it clear to me that Orgovyx was the way to go. Then the AterelaAI indicated that ADT wasn't necessary, per the Johns Hopkins RO. But I will do it anyway just to increase my odds of a good outcome.

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@tjnoffy As for what constitutes as “exercise” for minimizing the side-effects of such toxic pharmaceuticals as ADT, it involves more than just “…volleyball for a couple of hours twice a week, walks with the wife and dog most days.”

There has been much reported on the physical benefits of resistance-training exercise while on ADT. Here are just a few that I’ve bookmarked:

> Drs. Sholz and Moyad talking about exercise and hormone therapy: https://m.youtube.com/watch

> A paper on The Benefits of Exercise During Hormone Therapy: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54c68ac6e4b06d2e36a4b8c9/t/55cb7275e4b0d97ae7ff60af/1439396469154/The+Benefits+of+Exercise+During+Hormone+Therapy_Insights+August+2015_PCRI.pdf

> A study about the benefits of exercise to counteract the adverse effects of ADT: (They describe a good resistance-training program): https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2023/04000/resistance_exercise_training_increases_muscle_mass.2.aspx

If you do what it takes, you’ll do very well with hormone therapy - it’ll just be an annoyance; if you doesn’t do anything, hormone therapy can be your worst nightmare.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis Thanks for that. UMMC has offered a strength training study in concurrence with the proton therapy. I think it would be 2-3 times per week along with the proton therapy 5 days a week for 5½ weeks. If they recommend I do more than the study offers, I will.

REPLY
Profile picture for clevelandguy @clevelandguy

Hi,
From what others have done it’s kinda standard procedure to put someone on an ADT drugs before radiation and then for sometime after radiation. The ADT weakens the cancer. Why not go with one of the newer ADT drugs like Orgovyx which typically has fewer side effects than drugs like Lupron. Plus the Orgovyx is a daily pill and not a six months shot so if the side effects do become unbearable you can stop the daily pill. No two people react to ADT the same, side effects do vary from person to person.
Dave 3+4

Jump to this post

@clevelandguy

Great post but so many doctors will not do what you say because they are stuck with old technology by the health insurance companies, big pharma, and fear of being sued if they do any new types of care.

REPLY
Profile picture for pesquallie @pesquallie

@clevelandguy

Great post but so many doctors will not do what you say because they are stuck with old technology by the health insurance companies, big pharma, and fear of being sued if they do any new types of care.

Jump to this post

@pesquallie
Hi,
From what other people are saying on a couple of forums I participate in it’s pretty much a standard protocol. Have not heard any complaints that they had to go around doctors or health care networks.

Dave 3+4

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.