Hormone Therapy (ADT) when ArteraAI Test says it's not necessary

Posted by tjnoffy @tjnoffy, May 12 8:15am

My background: 67 years old; physically fit; not over weight; no diabetes; diagnosed in January 2026 with a Gleason of 7 (4+3); no metastasis shown (PET scan); PSA ~8.

[Please bear with this preamble. It's relavent.] I was originally seen by a surgical oncologist at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore. He recommended radical prostatectomy. I was on board with it, but read more about good outcomes with fewer side effects of proton therapy, so I got a referral to a radiology oncologist (RO) at JH. She said I'd be a good candidate for proton therapy, and offered me treatment at JH's proton therapy location in D.C. (an hour away) or at UofMD Medical Center in Baltimore (20 minutes away). For the recommended 5-1/2 weeks of daily (M-F) treatments, the latter was the obvious choice. Have met with UMMC ROs.

Part of UMMC's treatment plan is 4-6 months of hormone therapy (ADT), either Lupron shots or Orgovyx pills. However, the JH RO had submitted my biopsy and test results for ArteraAI analysis. The results came back and her recommendation was "low risk of metastases and not likely to benefit from hormone therapy. Therefore we would not recommend ADT with radiation."

The JH RO followed up by saying that UofMD was being conservative and that she didn't diagree with doing ADT, but stood by the ArteraAI results and still didn't think ADT was necessary. Of course, I want this cancer gone, but I don't want to deal with ADT side effects (in addition to the many others I will endure) if not really necessary.

So, has anyone in a similar situation opted out of ADT and had good outcomes or wished they had gone ahead with ADT? Are ADT side effects bearable? Any firsthand opinions on the ArteraAI testing? Thank you.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Maybe I misremember what Arterra recommends. I thought it was whether a second drug abiraterone (Zytiga) would be of benefit if added to the primary ADT agent. About 25% are recommended to take it; whereas about 75% would not benefit from adding to the primary ADT drug.

REPLY
Profile picture for thmssllvn @thmssllvn

Maybe I misremember what Arterra recommends. I thought it was whether a second drug abiraterone (Zytiga) would be of benefit if added to the primary ADT agent. About 25% are recommended to take it; whereas about 75% would not benefit from adding to the primary ADT drug.

Jump to this post

@thmssllvn
If you are on ADT alone for more than a year, it increases your chance of becoming Castrate resistant. If you add a drug like abiraterone or a lutamide That can extend the amount of time It takes.

Is ADT keeping you undetectable?

REPLY
Profile picture for thmssllvn @thmssllvn

Maybe I misremember what Arterra recommends. I thought it was whether a second drug abiraterone (Zytiga) would be of benefit if added to the primary ADT agent. About 25% are recommended to take it; whereas about 75% would not benefit from adding to the primary ADT drug.

Jump to this post

@thmssllvn For Gleason 8 or above that is what it does. For Gleason 7 (3+4 and 4+3) it is if there is short-term ADT benefit based on unspecified biomarkers. For Gleason 6 and 3+4 there is a statement if active surveillance is appropriate.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@thmssllvn
If you are on ADT alone for more than a year, it increases your chance of becoming Castrate resistant. If you add a drug like abiraterone or a lutamide That can extend the amount of time It takes.

Is ADT keeping you undetectable?

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc Curious, Jeff…didn’t Dr Weisserug prove to you that notion to be false in an email he sent you?That being on ADT early prevents castrate resistant clones from developing? And that long term ADT does not automatically cause castrate resistance?
He has been on Estradiol patch for like 16 yrs and is doing well so far…thoughts? Best,
Phil

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@jeffmarc Curious, Jeff…didn’t Dr Weisserug prove to you that notion to be false in an email he sent you?That being on ADT early prevents castrate resistant clones from developing? And that long term ADT does not automatically cause castrate resistance?
He has been on Estradiol patch for like 16 yrs and is doing well so far…thoughts? Best,
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil
He said essentially that the cancer cells will accumulate and get hit by cosmic rays and then convert to resistance.

It makes me think that when you are on ADT some cells still accumulate but if you are on estradiol, you don’t have that problem. I don’t know if that is true, I do know the few people that I know of that are on estradiol do not have a problem yet. And some people that were on ADT for many years alone, didn’t have that problem.

I do know that I was on only ADT for 2 1/2 years and became castrate resistant. Something happened to those cells. Predictions of how soon somebody will become castrate resistant after being on ADT alone say, it’s a median of two years.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@heavyphil
He said essentially that the cancer cells will accumulate and get hit by cosmic rays and then convert to resistance.

It makes me think that when you are on ADT some cells still accumulate but if you are on estradiol, you don’t have that problem. I don’t know if that is true, I do know the few people that I know of that are on estradiol do not have a problem yet. And some people that were on ADT for many years alone, didn’t have that problem.

I do know that I was on only ADT for 2 1/2 years and became castrate resistant. Something happened to those cells. Predictions of how soon somebody will become castrate resistant after being on ADT alone say, it’s a median of two years.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc OK, that’s interesting…but I think in your case the BRCA mutation pretty much makes your cancer aggressive which then leads to castrate resistance; I’ve read some studies - I’m sure you have read them all - where men are first tested for BRCA only because ADT stopped working; once they were found to have the mutation they were placed on PARP inhibitors.
Are you on one?
I think you were on Zytiga or Nubeqa but those aren’t PARP inhibitors. Thanks!
Phil

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@jeffmarc OK, that’s interesting…but I think in your case the BRCA mutation pretty much makes your cancer aggressive which then leads to castrate resistance; I’ve read some studies - I’m sure you have read them all - where men are first tested for BRCA only because ADT stopped working; once they were found to have the mutation they were placed on PARP inhibitors.
Are you on one?
I think you were on Zytiga or Nubeqa but those aren’t PARP inhibitors. Thanks!
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil
When I became castrate resistant to ADT, they did not know I had BRCA2. so I was put on Casodex for 15 months and then Zytiga. After 2 1/2 years, I switched to Nubeqa. I did take a PARP inhibitor for about five days, Then I spoke to my oncologist and said, This doesn’t make sense why aren’t I on Nubeqa, And she agreed to put me on it. Since it is work so well, there’s no need for me to be on a PARP until after it fails.

I found out I was BRCA2 in March 2022 while I was on Zytiga.

The side effects of the PARP are pretty serious so I really would like to avoid it as long as possible.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@heavyphil
When I became castrate resistant to ADT, they did not know I had BRCA2. so I was put on Casodex for 15 months and then Zytiga. After 2 1/2 years, I switched to Nubeqa. I did take a PARP inhibitor for about five days, Then I spoke to my oncologist and said, This doesn’t make sense why aren’t I on Nubeqa, And she agreed to put me on it. Since it is work so well, there’s no need for me to be on a PARP until after it fails.

I found out I was BRCA2 in March 2022 while I was on Zytiga.

The side effects of the PARP are pretty serious so I really would like to avoid it as long as possible.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc Well that’s great that the Nubeqa works, but it IS weird that it does, right?
I mean, if you are castrate resistant, none of the current hormone blockers should work at all.
Have they given you any explanation for this or is it just a stroke of good luck? Rather be lucky than good any day of the week!😉
Phil

REPLY

Hi,
From what others have done it’s kinda standard procedure to put someone on an ADT drugs before radiation and then for sometime after radiation. The ADT weakens the cancer. Why not go with one of the newer ADT drugs like Orgovyx which typically has fewer side effects than drugs like Lupron. Plus the Orgovyx is a daily pill and not a six months shot so if the side effects do become unbearable you can stop the daily pill. No two people react to ADT the same, side effects do vary from person to person.
Dave 3+4

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

I’ve read through your (& some others’) comments on this thread. But, I’ll respond to each of yours separately —>

(Background: At 65y, for a localized, Gleason 7(4+3), PSA 7.976, I had 28 fractions of proton radiation (2.5 grays per fraction during April-May 2021), with 6 months (two 3-month injections) of Eligard. So, our numbers are similar.)

I had discussions with my urologist (a surgeon), focal therapists (cryo, HIFU, & laser ablation), SBRT (Cyberknife & TruBeam), brachytherapy (LDR & HDR), as well as IMRT (photon) and proton. Each specialist indicated that their protocols would successfully treat my disease. I chose proton; the deciding factor for me was proton’s Bragg-Peak characteristics. I had treatments at the University of Cincinnati, just a 40-minute highway drive from my home.

There are two recent clinical trials comparing proton with photon for prostate cancer treatments - COMPPARE (comparing effectiveness, side effects, and patient-reported quality of life) and PARTIQoL (comparing quality of life and tumor control). Both studies indicated similar tumor control rates and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes. (Why proton radiation is generally considered superior for treating other solid tumor cancers located near critical, sensitive structures due to its precise targeting and reduced entry, scatter, and exit doses, leading to fewer side effects, but (for some reason) not prostate cancer, I don’t know. That goes into a much deeper discussion about clinical trials.)

The ArteraAI prostate test was not FDA-approved until mid-2025 so, I did not have access to that test. Also, Orgovyx (Religolix) was not FDA-approved for prostate cancer until late-2020 so, I did not have access to that ADT either.

As for an ArteraAI result of “not likely to benefit from hormone therapy”, I would probably take it anyway. The downside of 4-6 months of ADT is minimal, and I would tend to “slightly” overtreat the disease than undertreat it and (possibly) have to come back at it a second time.

There are fairly simple ways to minimize most ADT side-effects, so I wouldn’t let the “don't want to deal with ADT side effects” impact that decision. You also followed that comment with “…in addition to the many others I will endure.” What other side-effects do you think you’ll be enduring?

Prior to starting my six months of ADT hormone therapy, my medical oncologist thoroughly explained both the physical and mental health adverse side-effects of hormone therapy and how to avoid/minimize them —> with resistance training exercises.
> physical: weight-bearing exercises that maintain lean muscle mass helps offset the physical side-effects.
> mental: exercise turns on many “switches” in parts of the brain that put us in a better mood. It reduces stress, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and more.

She advised me that incorporating resistance-training exercise was a necessary part of the routine to minimize the potential physical/mental side-effects of hormone therapy.

Except for having zero libido due to the low testosterone, everything still worked. From what I was told by my medical oncologist, the key is to continue doing it, despite the “want to” not being there. Perhaps due to ramping up my resistance-training and cardio exercise programs to minimize the side-effects of hormone therapy, that might(?) also have had the side-benefit of keeping the blood flowing “down there” as well; I don’t know. Much of what goes on “down there” is about hydraulics so, keeping the blood flowing would seem to be important.

Ultimately (of course), the decision is yours.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis Thanks. Good information, especially with us having similar situations. I will go ahead with the hormone therapy, maybe 4 months (the lower end of the time span they quoted) unless they tell me something that makes 6 months necessary.

They also offered participation in a strength training study which would be a couple of days per week during proton therapy visits. I'll definitely join that.

The other side effects I'm referring to are from placement of the spacer and markers (sounds similar to the biopsy), so discomfort afterward, blood in stool, urine, semen, etc. The possible side effects of the radiation treatment itself, like fatigue, urinary issues, erectile issues. Then side effects of brachytherapy (again, similar to biopsy). And all of the longer-term side effects that are possible, including those above.

My JH RO, who was my first RO, convinced me that the ArteraAI test results were solid, so that's what I've had in my mind all along. So if I really didn't need to deal with the side effects of ADT, so much the better. But now I'm convinced "better safe than sorry."

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.