Anyone know what kind of treatment Suzanne Somers got over the years?

Posted by kseanob @kseanob, Oct 16, 2023

I'm not proud I'm asking this, but I figure this group will understand. Does anyone know the details of what specific type of breast cancer Suzanne Somers had, and what treatment she undertook for it over the years? I've read that it was an "aggressive" cancer, also that it came back several times. But did she have chemotherapy? When it "came back" did that mean a new case, or metastatis? I'm asking because when my daughter hears about her death, it may trigger a new round of worry about me. (Mastectomy, chemo, 14 years ago, then Arimidex) Thanks for any info you can provide -- as well as for your understanding.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.

@gemjaynes

Suzanne Somers got very rich promoting "bioidentical hormones" instead of traditional estrogen therapy to keep aging women young. Many in the medical community decried her theories, books, and products as dangerous. She had different cancers starting in her 30s. Only her doctors MIGHT know what caused or fed her cancers; we all know many cancers are just bad luck, a rogue cell mutation gone wild. I never take medical advice from actresses, but millions do in a desperate effort to keep their looks and stay young. Her first breast cancer was 20 years ago and she refused chemo.

Jump to this post

I saw a clip of Suzanne Sommers on The Today Show from April, 2023. I was shocked!! She was the thinnest I had seen her in decades and talked with a craggy voice. Not at all looking like the last picture of her taken in October. Supposedly. I am not trying to bash her. It is just hard on Cancer survivors when a celebrity with breast cancer is skewing the truth.

REPLY

Just wondering ... if she got her first cancer 40 years ago, and then breast cancer 20 years ago ... but is just now dying from it, and in the meantime enjoyed a vivacious life - is that really such a bad outcome?

REPLY
@cathd

Just wondering ... if she got her first cancer 40 years ago, and then breast cancer 20 years ago ... but is just now dying from it, and in the meantime enjoyed a vivacious life - is that really such a bad outcome?

Jump to this post

I was thinking the exact same thing! As someone who treated an aggressive cancer with lumpectomy, radiation, AI but no chemo I am finding this heartening! No way I can live another twenty years in any case but this was a good outcome. I don't use anything "alternative" as not my lifestyle but I'm guessing maybe the conventional therapies she did do worked well for her. Sometimes I think human beings can swept away by the idea of "fighting" and "failure." Death is a natural and inevitable conclusion to biological life--whether to a tree, an ant, or a person. It is no kind of personal disgrace and no one is to blame.

REPLY
@colleenyoung

Suzanne Somers was often criticized for spreading misinformation about various health and wellness claims, including her approach to chemical-free treatment for breast cancer.

Healthline wrote a detailed article about her approach to treatment and provides more background to some of the treatment option pros and cons:
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/did-suzanne-somers-really-regrow-her-breast-with-stem-cells
It's always sad to lose someone to breast cancer, especially a bubbly personality who came into our living rooms via the television. I do worry however about the influence stars can have on spreading non-evidence based treatment approaches. It's scary when people listen to TV or movie fame for guidance in health.

As always, I feel obliged to remind everyone to discuss any alternative or completmentary therapy options with your cancer care team. Inquire about Integrative Cancer Care at your cancer center
- Integrative Oncology https://www.mayoclinic.org/departments-centers/integrative-oncology/overview/ovc-20542190

@kseanob, thanks for allowing me to vent a little. I realize that you are asking about Suzanne Somers for a different reason. Hearing about the passing of a celebrity brings the reality of cancer back home and I can understand your concern that this could trigger worry in your daughter. For Somers, she lived with cancer for over 20 years, moving from remission to recurrence several times from what I could find. I did not see any information (yet) about type of breast cancer or stage.

I think it is important to let your daughter know that there are many different types of breast cancer and that everyone's experience is different. How do you help reduce your daughter's worry? That must be hard.

Jump to this post

Thank you, Colleen, as always -- for this wonderfully complete, well written response.

REPLY
@mir123

I was thinking the exact same thing! As someone who treated an aggressive cancer with lumpectomy, radiation, AI but no chemo I am finding this heartening! No way I can live another twenty years in any case but this was a good outcome. I don't use anything "alternative" as not my lifestyle but I'm guessing maybe the conventional therapies she did do worked well for her. Sometimes I think human beings can swept away by the idea of "fighting" and "failure." Death is a natural and inevitable conclusion to biological life--whether to a tree, an ant, or a person. It is no kind of personal disgrace and no one is to blame.

Jump to this post

It’s is import to look at quality vs quantity. Do you want to live 20 years “living “ with the aftermath of conventional treatment ? Or 19 years thriving with alternative treatment? This is all dependent on YOU.
Don’t look at any person and think I want what they have. You will have your own outcome based on your body and your support system
Suzanne’s insight opened my eyes to get second opinions and I’m glad I did. I read her book before I was diagnosed. I was strictly looking for menopause help. Years later I was diagnosed and pushed into the assembly line of treatment. I remember her story and how she knew the traditional route would kill her (or shorten her happiness). It took a lot of strength and money but I did get second opinions and was given partial radiation and I’m not on hormone blockers. All backed by western medicine not holistic herbs or remedies. I had stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma with clear margins and not her+. The “best”kind of cancer to get because of the high survival rate. But I was pushed into aggressive treatment. One dr even said mastectomy!! Definitely not a wise treatment in my case.

Do what is best for YOU and if it wasn’t a celebrity but YOU were the one telling others what worked for YOU. I would hope your story would empower others to seek out and listen to the best doctors they can find to help them with their journey

REPLY
@staceyd2424

It’s is import to look at quality vs quantity. Do you want to live 20 years “living “ with the aftermath of conventional treatment ? Or 19 years thriving with alternative treatment? This is all dependent on YOU.
Don’t look at any person and think I want what they have. You will have your own outcome based on your body and your support system
Suzanne’s insight opened my eyes to get second opinions and I’m glad I did. I read her book before I was diagnosed. I was strictly looking for menopause help. Years later I was diagnosed and pushed into the assembly line of treatment. I remember her story and how she knew the traditional route would kill her (or shorten her happiness). It took a lot of strength and money but I did get second opinions and was given partial radiation and I’m not on hormone blockers. All backed by western medicine not holistic herbs or remedies. I had stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma with clear margins and not her+. The “best”kind of cancer to get because of the high survival rate. But I was pushed into aggressive treatment. One dr even said mastectomy!! Definitely not a wise treatment in my case.

Do what is best for YOU and if it wasn’t a celebrity but YOU were the one telling others what worked for YOU. I would hope your story would empower others to seek out and listen to the best doctors they can find to help them with their journey

Jump to this post

Thank you …just described my situation and exactly my treatment. Stopped the AI after 8 weeks of side effects deciding that I do not want to spend the next 5 years miserable or even slightly miserable. I’m thankful that at my age (74) I can make that decision without guilt, however not sure what track I would have decided on 20 years ago.
Again thank you for your post I find on this site so many different pathways, opinions and medical approaches. I wish there was more standard of care out there in the BC universe.

REPLY

"or even slightly miserable"....LOLOLOL and bravo
(I made a different choice (under different circumstances) but respect yours.

REPLY
@jlgc

Thank you …just described my situation and exactly my treatment. Stopped the AI after 8 weeks of side effects deciding that I do not want to spend the next 5 years miserable or even slightly miserable. I’m thankful that at my age (74) I can make that decision without guilt, however not sure what track I would have decided on 20 years ago.
Again thank you for your post I find on this site so many different pathways, opinions and medical approaches. I wish there was more standard of care out there in the BC universe.

Jump to this post

@jlgc I totally agree with your comment, especially wishing for more standard of care out there on BC universe. I realize that BC cases & ppl are All different, but some treatments/surgery recommendations are 180 out, from one dr to a second opinion dr. We must advocate for ourselves, educate ourselves to make informed decisions for ourselves. Mayo Clinic forums & others are the basis for this education. Thank you @colleenyoung for guiding this forum.

REPLY
@jlgc

Thank you …just described my situation and exactly my treatment. Stopped the AI after 8 weeks of side effects deciding that I do not want to spend the next 5 years miserable or even slightly miserable. I’m thankful that at my age (74) I can make that decision without guilt, however not sure what track I would have decided on 20 years ago.
Again thank you for your post I find on this site so many different pathways, opinions and medical approaches. I wish there was more standard of care out there in the BC universe.

Jump to this post

I was just wondering about both you and Stacey (above) what your ER+ PR+ percentages were and if they were low I could understand forgoing the AI treatments. I am also 74 but mine were both 100% fueled by hormones, so I am really torn. At my age I have rheumatoid arthritis already and there are days I can hardly walk. Yet I trudge on with the AI treatments. What would YOU do? I would love to leave them in the dust!

REPLY
@pradalane

I was just wondering about both you and Stacey (above) what your ER+ PR+ percentages were and if they were low I could understand forgoing the AI treatments. I am also 74 but mine were both 100% fueled by hormones, so I am really torn. At my age I have rheumatoid arthritis already and there are days I can hardly walk. Yet I trudge on with the AI treatments. What would YOU do? I would love to leave them in the dust!

Jump to this post

My ER+ 90; PR+10-50. I guess one needs to be comfortable with not knowing. The best data I have seen for recurrence 5 years is 5% on AI; 15% off hormone RX.
I’m sure you can find other numbers supporting or not it’s just a personal decision. I would rather( I think) live comfortably for a few shorter years then uncomfortable and unhappy for several on hormone therapy.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.