Anyone know what kind of treatment Suzanne Somers got over the years?
I'm not proud I'm asking this, but I figure this group will understand. Does anyone know the details of what specific type of breast cancer Suzanne Somers had, and what treatment she undertook for it over the years? I've read that it was an "aggressive" cancer, also that it came back several times. But did she have chemotherapy? When it "came back" did that mean a new case, or metastatis? I'm asking because when my daughter hears about her death, it may trigger a new round of worry about me. (Mastectomy, chemo, 14 years ago, then Arimidex) Thanks for any info you can provide -- as well as for your understanding.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.
I saw a clip of Suzanne Sommers on The Today Show from April, 2023. I was shocked!! She was the thinnest I had seen her in decades and talked with a craggy voice. Not at all looking like the last picture of her taken in October. Supposedly. I am not trying to bash her. It is just hard on Cancer survivors when a celebrity with breast cancer is skewing the truth.
Just wondering ... if she got her first cancer 40 years ago, and then breast cancer 20 years ago ... but is just now dying from it, and in the meantime enjoyed a vivacious life - is that really such a bad outcome?
I was thinking the exact same thing! As someone who treated an aggressive cancer with lumpectomy, radiation, AI but no chemo I am finding this heartening! No way I can live another twenty years in any case but this was a good outcome. I don't use anything "alternative" as not my lifestyle but I'm guessing maybe the conventional therapies she did do worked well for her. Sometimes I think human beings can swept away by the idea of "fighting" and "failure." Death is a natural and inevitable conclusion to biological life--whether to a tree, an ant, or a person. It is no kind of personal disgrace and no one is to blame.
Thank you, Colleen, as always -- for this wonderfully complete, well written response.
It’s is import to look at quality vs quantity. Do you want to live 20 years “living “ with the aftermath of conventional treatment ? Or 19 years thriving with alternative treatment? This is all dependent on YOU.
Don’t look at any person and think I want what they have. You will have your own outcome based on your body and your support system
Suzanne’s insight opened my eyes to get second opinions and I’m glad I did. I read her book before I was diagnosed. I was strictly looking for menopause help. Years later I was diagnosed and pushed into the assembly line of treatment. I remember her story and how she knew the traditional route would kill her (or shorten her happiness). It took a lot of strength and money but I did get second opinions and was given partial radiation and I’m not on hormone blockers. All backed by western medicine not holistic herbs or remedies. I had stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma with clear margins and not her+. The “best”kind of cancer to get because of the high survival rate. But I was pushed into aggressive treatment. One dr even said mastectomy!! Definitely not a wise treatment in my case.
Do what is best for YOU and if it wasn’t a celebrity but YOU were the one telling others what worked for YOU. I would hope your story would empower others to seek out and listen to the best doctors they can find to help them with their journey
Thank you …just described my situation and exactly my treatment. Stopped the AI after 8 weeks of side effects deciding that I do not want to spend the next 5 years miserable or even slightly miserable. I’m thankful that at my age (74) I can make that decision without guilt, however not sure what track I would have decided on 20 years ago.
Again thank you for your post I find on this site so many different pathways, opinions and medical approaches. I wish there was more standard of care out there in the BC universe.
"or even slightly miserable"....LOLOLOL and bravo
(I made a different choice (under different circumstances) but respect yours.
@jlgc I totally agree with your comment, especially wishing for more standard of care out there on BC universe. I realize that BC cases & ppl are All different, but some treatments/surgery recommendations are 180 out, from one dr to a second opinion dr. We must advocate for ourselves, educate ourselves to make informed decisions for ourselves. Mayo Clinic forums & others are the basis for this education. Thank you @colleenyoung for guiding this forum.
I was just wondering about both you and Stacey (above) what your ER+ PR+ percentages were and if they were low I could understand forgoing the AI treatments. I am also 74 but mine were both 100% fueled by hormones, so I am really torn. At my age I have rheumatoid arthritis already and there are days I can hardly walk. Yet I trudge on with the AI treatments. What would YOU do? I would love to leave them in the dust!
My ER+ 90; PR+10-50. I guess one needs to be comfortable with not knowing. The best data I have seen for recurrence 5 years is 5% on AI; 15% off hormone RX.
I’m sure you can find other numbers supporting or not it’s just a personal decision. I would rather( I think) live comfortably for a few shorter years then uncomfortable and unhappy for several on hormone therapy.