1,645 total results
Discussion
Active Surveillance proves better for low-risk prostate cancer
Some casual reading. Best wishes to everyone.Monitoring proves better than active treatment for low-risk prostate cancer https://scienceblog.com/523988/monitoring-proves-better-than-active-treatment-for-low-risk-prostate-cancer/
Discussion
With a Decipher score of 0.29 has anyone done Active Surveillance?
Has anyone done Active Surveillance with a 0.29 Decipher Score?
Discussion
Choosing Active Surveillance over any further treatment at this time
This is a new comment , not related to the last post I'm not sure how to start a new thread but this is my...
Discussion
Is anyone with Gleason 4+3=7 trying active surveillance?
I am 72, recently diagnosed with with two localized tumors, one at the right apex, another at the right base. I have a girlfriend and...
Discussion
Active Surveillance vs Radiation for Unfavorable Intermediate R. Grp.
I am 74 yr old, in relatively good health & weight, except I also deal with RA. and have recently been given a diagnosis of...
Discussion
What is best next treatment after 20 years of active surveillance?
In 2005, I had prostate cancer surgery with Gleason = 7 (3 +4), 40%, pT2c, pNx, pMx. In 2013 PSA blood test, my PSA was...
Discussion
MRI-Based Active Surveillance Shows Promise in GS ≤ 3 + 4 PCa
The attached article, just published in European Urology, seems to firmly place Gleason 3/4 PCa in the category for AS consideration. I present it for...
Discussion
Good PSA/MRI active surveillance results still require fusion biopsy?
Hi all -newbie here. Will be age 67 March 2025. History:03/2023: PSA from 3.1 to 9.04/2023 MRI: 1.9cm PI-RADS 5 lesion and 0.6cm PI-RADS 4...
Discussion
Active Holistic Surveillance for Low & FI Risk PCa
A 2016 presentation by the Genitourinary Cancers Symposium outlines the results of a protocol called active holistic surveillance (AHS). The protocol I’ve implemented for the...
Discussion
AS for LR PCa hits 93% for VA patients
Just out today…August 14, 2026…. A recent study found active surveillance use for low-risk prostate cancer rose from 27% to 93% among veterans from 2005...
Comment
@fritzo I tracked all the PSA-type tests; I wanted to know if anything worse was lurking...
https://connect.mayoclinic.org/comment/1656084/
Comment
@joeelizabeth You are a perfect case for active surveillance. It can’t hurt to get a decipher...
Comment
@smoore4 A notable trend is that more and more low-grade disease (Gleason 6) are doing active...
Comment
@ginger38314 makes you wonder how many decided to get surgery based on that instead of choosing...
Connect