Anyone familiar with pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor (PHAT)?

Posted by kneenee @kneenee, Feb 7 10:34am

No search found. I may have this on left shin after 10 years ago biopsy done revealing negative for melanoma, DX="Lentigo" which is not serious and my dermatologistsaid another word for like a freckle. Lately the spot grew so another biopsy showed may be a hemangioma but cannot rule out PHAT. Pathologist recommends correlation with clinical findings and imaging studies. I want to find doctor with experience in this realm.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Melanoma & Skin Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for Susan, Volunteer Mentor @grammato3

@kneenee Yes, this forum, chat, site is called Mayo Clinic Connect.

Jump to this post

@grammato3 Hi again...update. So grateful I asked surgeon to have 2nd biopsy reviewed by 2nd Pathologist as was done with 1st biopsy of my shin. I had telephone visit and Dr. Royal, the surgeon, and he said after 2nd Pathology review, full DX made that it is NOT a PHAT! It is just pooling of blood, not moving. No need for surgery or Ultrasound. I commented, Thank God doc, and think about all the time, money and emotions saved! I am glad I asked for this 2nd Pathology review, as was done with 1st biopsy. YOU MUST ALWAYS ADVOCATE for YOURSELF! Imagine if I agreed with his initial recommendation for the surgery?! Whew.

REPLY
Profile picture for kneenee @kneenee

@grammato3 Hi again...update. So grateful I asked surgeon to have 2nd biopsy reviewed by 2nd Pathologist as was done with 1st biopsy of my shin. I had telephone visit and Dr. Royal, the surgeon, and he said after 2nd Pathology review, full DX made that it is NOT a PHAT! It is just pooling of blood, not moving. No need for surgery or Ultrasound. I commented, Thank God doc, and think about all the time, money and emotions saved! I am glad I asked for this 2nd Pathology review, as was done with 1st biopsy. YOU MUST ALWAYS ADVOCATE for YOURSELF! Imagine if I agreed with his initial recommendation for the surgery?! Whew.

Jump to this post

@kneenee: totally agree with you and totally relieved for you! As I recall, hadn't this possibility been considered in the initial differential, a kind of hemangioma? A collection of deep blood vessels like that is generally more common in the early stages of life - if that indeed was the issue - so I can understand why there may have been some confusion with determining the exact pathology but thankfully the second opinion revealed the underlying condition.

Now, how's that rotator cuff?

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.