High calcium score: I'm in shock
Hi everyone... just wanted to share my last few days - I'm scared and lost and was just hoping to hear from some people who have been in my place. Long story short - I went in for a "routine" checkup at age 50 to make sure my heart was okay. I had a stress test two years ago that was fine. But I do have a family history, and somewhat high LDL and blood pressure so the doctor sent me for a cardiac calcium score. It came back at 407 at age 50!!! That's like the 98th percentile for my age, which is shocking. I do Crossfit and have done half marathons so it was totally unexpected. Now I'm going for another stress test in two weeks to make sure no blockages are over 70%, and I'm not sure of the steps after that.... I'm terrified of needing open heart surgery - I've gotten myself into a place of being okay with a stent if needed. I know it's better to know than not know, but I just feel like my life was suddenly ripped out from under me and to be honest I'm spinning right now... every waking second I feel like I'm going to drop over..
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart & Blood Health Support Group.
I commented elsewhere the factor of age in calcium testing (and some cardiologists POV).
I WOULD like to know the age of those posting their calcium scores. Evidently is does have a major effect.
We have kind of a shortage of cardiologists around here (other specialists too) and I'll bet others would tell me the same thing.
I'm 77 and in the words of one cardiologist, at your age, of COURSE you'd (and anyone) would have elevated calcium! The rationale in medicine (especially per insurance coverage) is don't test anything you can't do anything about*. For example C+reactive protein (another cardiac marker). The thing is, there's no remedy for it so insurance won't cover it. (I said I'd out out of pocket but he still refused.)
I see reading here there are astronomical differences between calcium scores, though and I'd very much like to know what end of the range I fall in!!
Makes me mad.
* Another reasons doctors often refuse tests is if they carry any intrinsic harm. In this case the calcium test does zap you with a lot of radiation.
This probably doesn't apply to you (owing to age or other) but this is as good a time as any to remind anyone taking blood thinners that Vitamin is pretty much poison for such.
That would apply to people with AFIB for which they'd be taking an anti-coagulant.
Understood. Thanks for letting me know.
@hikerguy62, I noticed that you wished to post a couple of URLs to websites with your post.
You will be able to add URLs to your posts in a few days. There is a brief period where new members can't post links. We do this to deter spammers and keep the community safe. Clearly the links you wanted to post are not spam. Please allow me to post them for you.
- Vitamin D Factsheet from NIH https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Vitamind-Consumer/
- Mayo Clinic Q and A: How much vitamin D do I need? https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-q-and-a-how-much-vitamin-d-do-i-need/
Wow! I'd ditch that cardiologist. Shocking he'd say that.
@jkluv7
10,000 IU is extremely high. The daily recommended dose is 600 IU and most reputable websites I read recommend no more than 2,000 IU / day. I can't post full links at this time (this website won't allow me), but if youy go to ods --dot-- od --dot-- nih --dot-- gov or newsnetwork --dot-- mayoclinic --dot-- org and search on vitamin D, you can read for yourself. That high of a dose can cause side effects like nausea.
Hello, can you tell us how long it took for your CAC score to drop from 199 to 18? I was just told this past Tuesday that my CAC score was 2534!! Quite shocking given I've exercised all my life, have always maintained a healthy weight (155 lbs. at 5'7"), hiked for the last 30 years, very rarely ate red meat the last 10 years, non-smoker and non-drinker. I started taking 100mcg of K2 today after reading it could help reduce calcium build-up in the arteries (not remove, but just keep it from building up).
Thanks,
Andy
nany123, when you say your doctor "wasn't excited", did he or she offer a different view of advisable next steps? I recently did calcium score screening ("mild" CAC with 50% stenosis in my mid-LAD - male, age 65), and I've read that coronary intervention like an angioplasty should NOT be performed on an asymptomatic patient unless stress testing or FFR testing shows a moderate or severe degree of ischemia. Have you done those tests in addition to your CCTA, and by the way what degree of stenosis was shown by the CCTA, in how many vessels and in which segments?
I had an appointment with a cardiologist yesterday. I am asymptomatic but have a calcium score of 2300. I requested an angioplasty. My doctor wasn’t excited but agreed to do it to see the extent of the calcium build up and put in a stent if needed. Why would I not do this? It seems like the next smartest step.