Connect
Ascending Aortic Dilation - Ascending Aortic Aneurysm
I was diagnosed in 2012 with ascending aorta dialation of 4.1 cm. In 2013 no change. Finally went back to dr in 2017 and echo showed 4.3 cm. 2 months later dr made me have a chest scan which read 4.5 cm. which is correct? Echo or scan? Dr wants me to have another in 6 months. Very stressful.
Like
Helpful
HugInterested in more discussions like this? Go to the Aortic Aneurysms Support Group.
Connect
Hello All
I am 31/M
I had my bicuspid aortic valve replaced 8 years back with ATS Mechanical 22 Mm valve.
Now I am diagnosed with ascending aorta size of 5.2 and aortic root of 4.4.
I talked to 2 surgeons in diff hospital.
One surgeon says that no need to replace well functioning mechanical valve and will cut root just before the valve and cover the little rim and existing valve with graft.he gives reason if a mechnical valve passes 1 year successfully it typical remain forever and should not be changed. His recommendations is not to touch the place where valve is sewn to root.
Other surgeon is of opinion that when we will open we will be able to see the condition of root and if it need to be replaced we will put new composite graft already fitted with a new St.Jude valve.
He also believe my current valve is 100 percent functioning but as per him existing valve should have some tissues deposited and replacing a new is always better.
What to choose. Both surgeon are top notch surgeon in diff hospitals
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionThank you for providing additional information and details about your medical history, @dixitworld. I hope that others will be able to post and offer their own experiences. Do you have any family members or friends that can listen to your choices (or go with you to appointments) and help you discuss your concerns?
quit the stress. only can make it worse. Do work outs, bike, no heavy lifting over 50 pounds, keep BP under control and realize that you know what may give you problems in future. Most people do not. Mine is 4.7, wet to cleveland clinic, dr told me i have 10 more years. What ever. live your life and quit worrying.
Hi, I think you are right about the aneurysm not shrinking. However, the measurements you have had are all pretty close and the different tests and different technicians can result in different numbers. The most important factor is to determine if the aneurysm is growing and if so, at what rate. My ascending aortic aneurysm has been at about 3.9 - 4.1, depending on the test, for years and years. I am hopeful I will never need surgery. The aneurysm no longer controls my life but I am careful about what kind of exercise I do and how much I lift. I too have high blood pressure, controlled with meds. I wish you good health and a stable aneurysm.
Donna
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI was diagnosed in August 2019 with an ascending aortic aneurysm, measured at 4.2-4.3cm via CT scan and confirmed by a vascular surgeon and two cardiologists. Last week, I went back to recheck and see if there had been any growth. I opted for an MRA to avoid the radiation, and because the cardiologist said it would provide the same accuracy. The imaging showed that the aneurysm was/is now 3.9cm, which is great news, but also somewhat implausible, because everything I've read and heard from doctors is that these do not shrink on their own. I did start medication for hypertension after the initial diagnosis (olmesartan) last year, and my BP is now normal, but it wasn't dangerously high before (peaking at 140/90 last year). That's the only medication I am on, and there haven't been any other major lifestyle changes.
Is there a possible reason for this disparity in imaging results? I'm cautiously optimistic, but also confused.
Thanks
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionHi, @bryanfox - I wanted to let you know I have moved your post here to this discussion called "Ascending Aortic Dilation - Ascending Aortic Aneurysm" so that you can talk with others who have had a similar situation. Hoping that @cobweb @hopeful33250 @dixitworld @rory and others will return to this discussion to respond to your question about MRA vs. CT scan in measuring ascending aortic aneurysm.
Have you gotten the chance to ask your doctor specifically what he or she thinks about the disparity in your imaging results?
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionYes, he said that it's within the "margin of error" and to just come back in a year to do a re-scan, which again, seems to be good news, but perhaps TOO good, which is why I made the original post. Thanks
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionRelax, stress hurts you. Exercise, but no heavy lifting of weights. Keep your bp down. If you stress out, it hurts you. I have asked my Drs a lot of questions. I also went to the Cleveland Clinic. Get on the net. There are great interviews on line with Cleveland Clinc drs and mayo drs. Good luck. BY the way my size is 4.7/
Hi Marie,
I had a triple A surgery done at Abbott Heart 4 years ago. Everything went good. I went in this last week because I had a cat scan of lungs. They said I had two aneurism. I went back to my vascular surgeon at Abbott he did a scan and read their scan and saw things very different then the other radiologist. I think Abbot's heart is the best. I had one anerisim 3.7 no dilation. He is very good, but, he is retiring. He is contacting me with the name of another vascular surgeon at Abbott to keep watch on me. Have to go in.once a year for recheck. I am 76. Hope this helps. Abbott is much closer then Mayo. Good luck. My thoughts are with you.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI hope you made it to Costa Rica! I empathize with you! We all are in the same crazy boat! I think it is because the risk of surgery has its percentages, and the percentage of yours bursting at your level- perhaps it’s less percentage than surgery? I don’t know.I am now on Medicare with an advantage plan . Perhaps you should look into what Mayo can do for you. It’s sinful that we must turn to go fund me on Facebook or something or other for our survival.