Failed ablation
I have had several cardio conversions. Doctor suggested an ablation would help stabilize the rhythm. Went through many tests in preparation for the ablation to pinpoint the exact area in the heart. Ablation failed within one day and I was back in a fib. Anyone have suggestions on what to do next?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart Rhythm Conditions Support Group.
Hi Gloaming,
I always appreciate your input. It is obvious that you are extremely knowledgeable, even though - as you say - you are not a medical professional.
You mention RVR as being serious. I have had RVR with each episode of AFib - and I currently have RVR now. Hence, it is imperative that I stop my ventricle contractions.
However (unless I misunderstood you), I respectfully disagree with your statement that "there is no ablation, no lesions, when doing a pacemaker implant." If you are referring to just implanting the pacemaker, I - of course - agree with you. However, if you are referring to the procedure to destroy the AV node, I do not agree with you.
Ablation, by definition is a procedure doctors use to destroy abnormal tissue that can be present in many conditions. such as tumors in the lung, breast, thyroid, liver, spine, etc. Obviously, ablation is also used to destroy heart tissue that's causing irregular heartbeats.
My EP described two basic types of ablations - which he called an "AFib Ablation" or an "AV Node Ablation". The first ablation is, of course, the destruction of the many small lesions to prevent AFib. He (and another EP with whom I had a second opinion) felt that my chance of success with that ablation was very low. The other ablation is often called a "Pace and Ablate". I don't need the "pace" part because I had a pacemaker implanted 4 year ago. However, I will have the "ablate" portion, where he will ablate or destroy the Atrioventricular (AV) node, preventing the electrical heartbeat signal from my atria to my ventricles. The pacemaker will then "take over". I apologize if I misunderstood you, and your saying "there is no ablation" was only referring to a pacemaker implant, not the destruction of the AV Node. Thanks again for all your input; you have been very helpful to many of us.
Yes, you describe it better than I did, Betty. I meant that, if no ablation is done, there won't be a disruption of signal, so there will be no change in arrhythmia above the AV node. As you say, if the node, itself, is ablated, then there can be no RVR because that response is precluded by the disruption of that pathway. Instead, the pacemaker takes over permanently, and it paces the rest of the heart's rhythm...or should if adjusted properly.
As you seem to have accepted, based on the opinions of two EPs now, your particular case is not likely to respond positively to a first/another atrial ablation. So, if that is the case, your condition above your left ventricle will not change, and may progress (as AF normally does). In my sloppy way, I was discussing the atrium and how a pacemaker installation, alone, will not change AF, and this is often the case, but you have correctly pointed out that another reader, including you, might think I was claiming that there is no ablation performed during a pacemaker implant. Naturally, that is not true...there MUST be an ablation to destroy the AV node. Otherwise, the two signaling bodies will merely fight each other.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Well, you learn something new every day. I don’t know how with all the reading I’ve done on AFib, I had never read about RVR. Based on bpm, I have RVR. My recent heart monitor showed my AFib went as high as 150 although typically the high is in the 120s. My resting heart rate is mid-50s and sometimes high 40s when lying down.
Until now, I thought all AFib patients have high heart rates. Now I understand why some people have silent AFib. Before, I couldn’t understand how someone could be unaware seeing as I have so many symptoms. Hmmm.
Gloaming - thanks for clearing that up so quickly! So many people do believe that a pacemaker will 'cure' AFib, the same as an ablation. I am a prime example that it doesn't - since I am on my fourth episode of AFib since my pacemaker was implanted - all with RVR ! I really preferred to have PFA because I didn't like the idea of an AV Node ablation (sort of like using the generator as the only power source for the house). However, I also did not want to have multiple ablations, as many people on this site have reported. As you accurately state, "I have accepted" that an AV Node Ablation is the correct course for me. I requested a cardioversion before the ablation, however. I want to start out with my atria not in AFib to compare any differences I feel once I am back in AFib (which certainly will happen).
Zebra - like you, I was confused why so many people "live" with AFib for years without doing anything about it - while my doctors were 'pushing' me to do something! My EP mentioned that my heart rate was over 100 most of the time, but I didn't think that was such a problem. When I saw "RVR" on an ECG report, I started researching and went back through all of my ECG reports and learned that RVR was a part of each episode of Afib that I had. Then I researched RVR to see how my AFib was affecting my ventricles (not good!).
This is all such a learning experience! As you can tell from my "name", I also have CLL (a chronic leukemia). I joined MCC because of that! Then I got distracted by the Heart Rhythm Support Group - and here I am! I sincerely hope I don't have to join too many other support groups!
@bettycll
I’m one of the people living with untreated AFib for years. I’ve always felt for me the risk of treatment was greater than the risk of no treatment. Lesser of two evils. I have a long history of adverse reactions and complications. I just finally had a consult with an EP. He agrees that I have a lot of added risks with DOACs and ablation. He came highly recommended, takes on complicated cases and is willing to treat me. He said I would likely end up having 2-3 ablations overall. I don’t even want one. I do feel he’s the right EP for the job if I decide to move forward with PFA.
Like you, I came to this Mayo site for cancers and rare conditions but I’ve probably found the AFib threads and everyone’s experiences here the most enlightening. I have lung tumor ablations I need to take care of before any heart ablation. The EP agrees.
In the meantime, I need to talk to my oncology teams before I make my decision. I also have so many food triggers, I’m trying a very limited whole foods diet hoping to minimize episodes as afib frequently and duration have become a quality of life issue. I also have dysphagia from a neuro issue so eating fruits and veggies is especially challenging, nearly impossible. Lots of food allergies too. Losing my taste and smell 8 years ago after taking strong antibiotics is an added eating challenge. So far the extremely limited diet is helping but needs to help more. There are so many possible triggers other than food, I’m sure I can’t stop them all. I do appreciate all the real life stories that have been shared. If I ever have ablation I’ll share my experience. Despite all that, I’m still enjoying life in between all the medical stuff. Best of luck to all.
Hi Zebra - like you, I have also been weighing the "lesser of two evils". I, too, find everyone's experiences to be very enlightening and helpful as I navigate these issues.
I did talk with my oncology team. They were very supportive of "Pace and Ablate"; my oncologist called it a "One and Done", since so many of the antiarrhythmics I was given (which didn't work) conflict with meds they would use. That helped my decision.
I sympathize with the other issues you mentioned. My husband has dysphagia, so I am very aware how challenging that can be. Very few people are aware how difficult it is to have eating problems.
Good luck with everything! Continue enjoying life between medical stuff!
Zebre,
Hello. I have known about my AFib since 2003. There are 4 kinds: you have the same kind as I do with low heart beats. I usually cannot tell when having an AFib session and that can be a higher risk per my cardiologist.
Recommend you read "The AFIB Cure" by Drs. Day and Bunch. Both are cardiologists and EPs. An excellent resource providing guidance, hope and a 5 step plan how to improve your quality of life and put AFib in remission.
All the best...
Thank you @oumike for your response. My heart rate is actually only low when not in afib. It’s high when in afib and I’m always aware. I am looking for ways to prevent triggers. I bought the afib cute long ago and skimmed through it but now that I know more about afib and my personal triggers I’ll have to really read it in a new light. Thanks and best of luck with your afib.
You make some really good points; I agree that many of us make "excuses" for our conditions and others who seem to say "what the heck!" it isn't going to make any difference anyway so why try! (Remember all the smokers who used to say "we all have to die of something!" but then when they get COPD or lung cancer or esophageal cancer--whatever smoking is know to contribute to--they fight like heck to be "cured." It is also true that some things are just the luck of the draw, or genetic in origin or age related! A-fib in younger folks seems unpredictable; then we get over 65 and all of a sudden the docs say--'well, it is just an aging disease/condition." I looked at the suspected "causes" for A-fib and really had none of them except age! On the other hand, when I try to negotiate with my doc over decisions on what I am willing to risk, I get the same drug "recommended" dosages and choices determined by big pharma! Shouldn't we have the right as patients to decide what is "worth the risk" and what is "prescibed" based on drug companies and their profit margins? My doc says I must stay on Eliquis 5mg twice daily because that is the appropriate dosage; my brother has A-fib and he has never been on Eliquis, just takes a low dose ASA. I currently have had NSR for several weeks and take a drug for rhythm as well as rate. How much poison do I have to take before I can decide to decrease the dosage; I look at the "side effects" of these meds and they scare me to death! I am beginning to think that I will not die of A-fib issues but due to the damage all these drug combinations will do to me.
Your experience is exactly why I do not go to docs. I could write a book on the experiences I had from the very FEW times I went to a doctor since I was 20 yrs old and now next month 77. My best friend in Florida was trying to prove to her family that she was healthy enough to live by herself. She took no drugs and had energy at 82. One number was a LITTLE high so the doc put her on a med. The med caused a problem, so another med. In very few months she had to have one of those daily plastic things to keep track of a handful of pills. She got symptom after symptom and ALL were due to the drugs, In six months, her last symptom was depression. The drugs took away her will to live and she shut her eyes on purpose and stopped eating and died. The doctors orders killed her.
You do not have to take any more poison, the decision is yours. I have read the side effects of Eliquis before and no way would I swallow one. I am not encouraging you to do anything as the doctor trusting people whomp on me. I am saying, I do not believe in doing what others do. I research and decide for myself. I have watched 34 people die who were younger than me, and all went to docs and obeyed whatever they said and did not change their diet one bit and I believe every one of them was younger than me, some as much as 20 yrs younger. I walk up and down steep hills to town every day and eat mostly natural foods. Clean my house and take care of myself. I could write a book, but not room here.