Ascending Aorta Size vs Descending Aorta Size Cause for Surgery

Posted by dougloj @dougloj, Mar 18 11:30pm

I am a 63 year old male. My AAA measures at 5 cm. I’ve been told by my surgeon that because my ascending aorta is twice the size of my descending aorta, I should have surgery now or I will be at 10% risk of a rupture. Does anyone know about the risk associated with the relationship between the ascending aorta and descending aorta sizes?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Aortic Aneurysms Support Group.

From what I understand, he’s telling you that your ascending aorta is dilated more than 1.5 times your descending aorta although I’m not aware of that dimension being significant for doing surgery. Almost every cardiovascular surgeon recommends repairing it when it gets to be 5.0. According to the latest by the American heart Association guidelines in 2021, until it gets to be 5.0 it’s not a huge chance of an issue in one year (less than 1% of dissecting or rupturing) however, once you get to 5.0 it jumps up to 10% ( like your surgeon recommending the surgery said)…
I don’t know the initial size of your aneurysm, but assumming it was diagnosed at 4.1 cm
the risk of dissection and rupture increases by approximately 400% when the aneurysm grows from 4.1 cm to 5.0 cm, according to the AHA guidelines for monitoring an ascending aneurysm (if you have a descending aneurysm, I think they allow it to get a little bit bigger before they operate. (It’s just that the velocity and pressure of the blood coming out of your heart right there is critical )If you have a bicuspid aortic valve (instead of tricuspid), Marfans or several genetic variations, it becomes super urgent to do it at 5.0( because with the the aforementioned variations, they frequently do it at 4.5cm). Also if you’re in relatively good health, with no other major issues, it’s safer to do it. True, it’s not an easy surgery, But that’s why they wait until it does get to be 5.0 or larger because at that point, the risk of the surgery is outweighed by the risk of the dissection or rupture. The recommendations your surgeon is making are based on the standard of care for a 5.0 ascending aortic aneurysm.

REPLY

Sorry I dictated that last posting and there are some typos that hopefully don’t change the meaning of what I was trying to say I hope it’s understandable. I’m so sorry.

REPLY

You are very lucky!

REPLY
@dianelynn

I also have a TAA 5.4 I’m wondering if you would explain what kind of stress caused your emergency?
How are you feeling now about it?
Ty
Diane

Jump to this post

I have read and heard several times that it 5.5 cm is cause for surgery

REPLY
@ginnycake

Sorry I dictated that last posting and there are some typos that hopefully don’t change the meaning of what I was trying to say I hope it’s understandable. I’m so sorry.

Jump to this post

Thankfully,
You got help !!

REPLY
@dougloj

I have read and heard several times that it 5.5 cm is cause for surgery

Jump to this post

What often gets over looked is that nearly 50% of ascending aorta/root disect or rupture between 5 and 5.5. Mine was at 4.8 when the root ruptured during surgery for resection of aneurysm on the Right Coronary artery, ligation of complex coronary fistula and double bypass of the LAD. Fortunately the surgeon and I had a discussion of 3 different scenarios to deal with it either that day if necessary or in the future. The decision was made for us and it was over a 14 hour surgery that day and evening. Turns out the tissue was fragile and that wasn't something that showed up in CT with contrast or angiograms with catheter procedure.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.