Waterheater at 130 means no need for filters, showered changes etc?!

Posted by thorne @thorne, Jan 31, 2023

I had an email exchange with Dr Falkinham (the scientist who does all the work on exposure to NTM, especially in water sources) asking whether raising the temperature of the home water heater meant you do not have to use special filters or shower heads. As much as I have read this (and the NTM) forums, I did not understand the answer to this. It seems like so many people on here are only doing tub baths (me) or buying special and replacing special filters or shower heads. His reply is below and would indicate that we don't need to make any of those other changes if we raise our water heater temperature to 130 or above. This seems like such as easy fix compared to all of the other undertakings.

Dear Tamara:

Thank you for your reply and request for further information.

In a study of Philadelphia suburb patients, we discovered that raising the water heater temperature setting to 130 F or higher led to the disappearance of Mycobacterium avium from samples of household water, including showerheads.

That might surprise some as a showerhead will be delivering both heater (hot) and unheated water (cold). Yes, the source of water from the water heater is cold water, but in most municipalities the water delivered to homes has low numbers of NTM. My colleagues and I believe that the water heater is where NTM grow and are mixed with the cold.

We haven't tested "tank-less" or "instant" water-heaters, but logic suggests there should be no growth of NTM, as those water heaters don't have a large tank.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the MAC & Bronchiectasis Support Group.

@pjas972j

The paper I read from Dr. Falkenheim at Virginia Tech says to keep your water heater at 140 degrees Farenheit. He also says to drain your water heater once a month. Yes, it's hot, but apparently that is the temp needed to keep the water heater from becoming a breeding ground. We set our water heater at that temp and have simply adjusted by adding more cold when needed. We also give our guests a heads up so they don't have a problem washing their hands.

Jump to this post

Draining a hot water tank once a month is a lot of trouble especially if your tank is large. It still seems like doing a water test from the hot water tap would tell you if that was even necessary? Regarding the UV, I believe that would always come BEFORE the hot water tank so it would not solve that issue of it growing in the tank. 140 is quite hot. Wonder about the safety of having the tank set so high as tanks get older. Would it cause pressure to build up??

REPLY
@sueinmn

The problem with UV filtering is that it does not impact any NTM or other bacteria that the light does not contact directly, so anything already living on biofilm in the pipes or hot water reservoir would not be killed.

You may copy the text, but please attribute it to Dr Joe Falkinham, who wrote to Tamara, as he is a recognized expert in the field of NTM and water.

I am sure he is referring to 130F which converts to 55C.
Sue

Jump to this post

Yes, it's 55C or 130F. I read a study (should have saved it) saying that NTM dies after a 5 second exposure to temperature 55C or higher. I guess if we could all take baths in temperature 55C or higher, we would be free from NTM instantaneously. Also, I read that NTM is resistant to UV light, otherwise we could be cured using UV light therapy. It said UV light only kills about 10pc of bacteria when exposed. (I will be saving those studies in the future to post here.)

REPLY

This is from an NYU Langone presentation. I guess the details can vary from study to study, but for all we know, yes heat kills NTM.

REPLY

I have been concerned about finding a shower head with holes larger than 1 mm diameter, as recommended by Dr. Falkinham in his 2021 article "Reducing Exposure to Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM)." If anyone has been able to find one that you recommend, please let me know. Also, do most rainshower shower heads have larger than average holes? I was relieved to read in thorne's comment on Jan.31 that Dr. Falkinham says that you do not need a special showerhead as long as you set your water heater to 130 or higher, which I have done. Thank you so much for sharing that information. It really relieved a lot of my concerns. Donna Turnbaugh

REPLY
@donnaturn

I have been concerned about finding a shower head with holes larger than 1 mm diameter, as recommended by Dr. Falkinham in his 2021 article "Reducing Exposure to Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM)." If anyone has been able to find one that you recommend, please let me know. Also, do most rainshower shower heads have larger than average holes? I was relieved to read in thorne's comment on Jan.31 that Dr. Falkinham says that you do not need a special showerhead as long as you set your water heater to 130 or higher, which I have done. Thank you so much for sharing that information. It really relieved a lot of my concerns. Donna Turnbaugh

Jump to this post

Following. I tested the temperature of our water and it is around 135. My question is do I need to run the hot water through all of our faucets and showers to kill bacteria in the pipes? Or are we only concerned with the bacteria in the water heater itself?

REPLY
@mimifeels

Yes, it's 55C or 130F. I read a study (should have saved it) saying that NTM dies after a 5 second exposure to temperature 55C or higher. I guess if we could all take baths in temperature 55C or higher, we would be free from NTM instantaneously. Also, I read that NTM is resistant to UV light, otherwise we could be cured using UV light therapy. It said UV light only kills about 10pc of bacteria when exposed. (I will be saving those studies in the future to post here.)

Jump to this post

You bring up a good point. I am a big fan of Dr Falkinham and his research and follow his recommendations. I have my water heater turned up above 130°. But what about the cold water that mixes with the hot? We can't take showers with water of 130°. The cold water would have NTM. Wouldn't we still need to use the shower heads recommended and clean them? Just trying to think this through.

REPLY

This is what he said Re this issue:
Dear Tamara:

Thank you for your reply and request for further information.

In a study of Philadelphia suburb patients, we discovered that raising the water heater temperature setting to 130 F or higher led to the disappearance of Mycobacterium avium from samples of household water, including showerheads.

That might surprise some as a showerhead will be delivering both heater (hot) and unheated water (cold). Yes, the source of water from the water heater is cold water, but in most municipalities the water delivered to homes has low numbers of NTM. My colleagues and I believe that the water heater is where NTM grow and are mixed with the cold.

We haven't tested "tank-less" or "instant" water-heaters, but logic suggests there should be no growth of NTM, as those water heaters don't have a large tank.

REPLY
@davis5663

You bring up a good point. I am a big fan of Dr Falkinham and his research and follow his recommendations. I have my water heater turned up above 130°. But what about the cold water that mixes with the hot? We can't take showers with water of 130°. The cold water would have NTM. Wouldn't we still need to use the shower heads recommended and clean them? Just trying to think this through.

Jump to this post

Back by popular demand:) Dr Falkinham’s recommendations for reducing exposure to NTM.
https://connect.mayoclinic.org/discussion/reducing-exposure-to-nontuberculous-mycobacteria-ntm/
Enjoy,
Linda Esposito

REPLY
@sadair20

Following. I tested the temperature of our water and it is around 135. My question is do I need to run the hot water through all of our faucets and showers to kill bacteria in the pipes? Or are we only concerned with the bacteria in the water heater itself?

Jump to this post

How did you test the temperature of your water?

REPLY
@irenea8

How did you test the temperature of your water?

Jump to this post

I ran the hot water for 3 minutes. Then, I put my meat thermometer in a glass and continued running the hot water into the glass with meat thermometer for another 2 or 3 minutes. I read this method on the internet somewhere but I figured it might be as accurate as any other method. I’m open to trying it another way if someone has a suggestion.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.