How important is taking hormone blockers after surgery for IDC?

Posted by cadunkin @cadunkin, Sep 5, 2022

I’m 71 & diagnosed with IDC. The tumor was very small, clean margins & no lymph node involvement. After much research & discussion with my oncologist I am leaning toward 3 weeks of radiation & no hormone blocking drugs. I understand that there is more risk of cancer returning, but the difference in that risk doesn’t seem worth the side effects of the drugs. It’s important to me to remain active so the bone loss, joint pain & fatigue would greatly affect my quality of life. I would greatly appreciate all discussion on others that have made this decision & how they are doing. All of it is scary! Thanks much everyone.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Breast Cancer Support Group.

@jbp

I was on arimidex for 3 years and Tamoxifen for 7 years....the side effects were minimal and they kept my cancer at bay. When taken off Tamoxifen my cancer recurred...so my advice is to give it a try...having your cancer not return as a stage IV disease is the goal.

Jump to this post

This comment alone will keep me taking my Tamoxifen. After my lumpectomy in Dec 2019, and proton therapy radiation, I was started on AIs. The side effects were unbearable, let alone the trauma of forcing menopause. The Tamoxifen is better but as a newlywed, the side effects are still troubling. However, recurring cancer would be far worse. Now I need to find ways to manage these side effects.

REPLY
@anjalima

anjalima | @anjalima | 1 day ago
At 71, and After a “ normal” mammo and ultrasound in 10/21 (but a persistent symptom) I PERSISTED… until an MRI revealed 2 tumors IDC. ONCOTYPEs 14 and 20. ER+, HER2-, I had a unilateral mastectomy Feb. 2022. Reconstruction began at time of surgery and completed exchange surgery in July. I began Anastrozole in April. I’m mid way through month 5 and I have very minimal obvious side effects … some days my hips ache until I stretch. I will do a one year DEXA ( insurance won’t pay until 2 years) to check in on possible unforeseen side effects . My advice is to try ( anti) hormone treatment if advised by oncologist and see if will work for you. If it does you are one of the 60% who are lucky enough to use this tool. Science and incredible amounts of research tells us that it is beneficial for hormone + BC.
I recently read the informational insert again and I surmised that there is potential wiggle room as far as dosing goes. Worth a conversation with oncology.

But, like you, I question everything. I declined suggested radiation because I technically qualified for the TAILOR RT clinical trial <25 ONCOTYPE, which is studying AI alone vs AI plus standard fraction radiation. Many institutions are offering this clinical trial to determine the benefit of radiation in certain clinical pictures. It was the TAILOR RX clinical trial that led to ONCOTYPING and since 2015 has saved 70% of BC patients from unneeded chemotherapy.

Science and research are on our side trying to fine tune treatments that are beneficial while trying to minimize risk. Supporting research is critical!

As I will be followed very closely with mammo and MRI alternating 6 mos. I’m hoping that any future local recurrence will be found.

We make the best possible decisions with the information we have weighing benefit, risk and quality of life.

A collective hug to all of us on this healing journey. 🌸

Jump to this post

It's dismaying to read that two tumors were missed but both mammogram and ultrasound, since so many women are relying on at least a mammogram to catch cancer early.

If you don't mind sharing it, what was the symptom that you detected and fueled your persistence. And kudos for that persistence, by the way. My mother was a doctor who stressed to her children to pay attention to, and know, your own body as knowing it well might save your life one day.

REPLY
@callalloo

I don't remember the cut-off between low and intermediate risk for the OncotypeDX but will try to find the report with that information. I'm not certain what you're referring to as "different margins for 50 and up" but the OncotypeDX looks at the genomics of the tumor tissue. I'm not aware that it takes age or other demographics into account. It might, but that's not my impression.

OncotypeDX results can be surprising. There is one case, I believe still on their website, of a stage 4, large tumor cancer that showed a very low risk of recurrence. And a stage 1, DCIS with a very high risk of recurrence. This is interesting to me because oncologists looking at the biopsies might assume totally different risk profiles for these tumors based on their experience. And might be inclined to underestimate the risk for the stage 1 DCIS or inadvertently undertreat it.

Jump to this post

I remember when I received my results it was sorted such as say for example age 20-50 a score of 0-20 doesn’t need chemo and 50-up a score of 0-25 doesn’t require chemo. I’ll have to try to find it. I do remember reading that for my age 68- the score was 0-26 and my score was 13 so I escaped chemo. I’m going to look for my test results and the explanation that was with it.

REPLY
@callalloo

It's dismaying to read that two tumors were missed but both mammogram and ultrasound, since so many women are relying on at least a mammogram to catch cancer early.

If you don't mind sharing it, what was the symptom that you detected and fueled your persistence. And kudos for that persistence, by the way. My mother was a doctor who stressed to her children to pay attention to, and know, your own body as knowing it well might save your life one day.

Jump to this post

Yes, Callaloo it’s an incredibly scary statistic that 10% of BC is not picked up by mammo nor, apparently ultrasound ( which was my “ safety “ add on screening as I have dense breasts). Your mother is wise to suggest trusting your own body when something is “off” .

So, my symptom was loss of color to the otherwise pinkish areola when I raised my arm ( I was innocently and thankfully applying deodorant in front of a mirror one day). The areola became whitish, yellowish with arm raised but returned to my normal pinkish immediately when I lowered my arm.

Neither my extremely experienced breast doctor and surgeon nor her colleagues had ever encountered this. I was given an immediate mammo, ultrasound and breast exam which all turned up “ normal”.

I persisted until an MRI was performed and within two hours the radiologist called me in for a targeted ultrasound ( code for you are getting a biopsy… or two!) the MRI also picked up on an enlarged sentinel node ( which was biopsied and positive ). I had hoped that enlargement was from my recent Covid booster.

What was causing my symptom is that one of the tumors was occluding ( kinking) a blood vessel when I raised my arm. With no blood flow the areola lost its “color” . The plastic surgeon, who is also a micro surgeon, knew immediately.

My advice for dense breasts … GET AN MRI!

REPLY
@jaynep

I remember when I received my results it was sorted such as say for example age 20-50 a score of 0-20 doesn’t need chemo and 50-up a score of 0-25 doesn’t require chemo. I’ll have to try to find it. I do remember reading that for my age 68- the score was 0-26 and my score was 13 so I escaped chemo. I’m going to look for my test results and the explanation that was with it.

Jump to this post

ONCOTYPE suggests:

0-18 premenopausal = no chemo

0-25 post menopausal = no chemo

REPLY

I started taking hormone therapy (arimidex) over 2 years ago and I really haven’t had any problems. Sure in the beginning I had hot flashes but after a couple of months my body adjusted. Sometimes I have minor bone pain but certainly not everyday. I have read that hormone therapy can reduce recurrence by up to 50% so to me, I feel it is worth it. This has been my experience. I had IDC 8mm Stage 1a, grade 1 and no lymph node involvement.

REPLY
@anjalima

Yes, Callaloo it’s an incredibly scary statistic that 10% of BC is not picked up by mammo nor, apparently ultrasound ( which was my “ safety “ add on screening as I have dense breasts). Your mother is wise to suggest trusting your own body when something is “off” .

So, my symptom was loss of color to the otherwise pinkish areola when I raised my arm ( I was innocently and thankfully applying deodorant in front of a mirror one day). The areola became whitish, yellowish with arm raised but returned to my normal pinkish immediately when I lowered my arm.

Neither my extremely experienced breast doctor and surgeon nor her colleagues had ever encountered this. I was given an immediate mammo, ultrasound and breast exam which all turned up “ normal”.

I persisted until an MRI was performed and within two hours the radiologist called me in for a targeted ultrasound ( code for you are getting a biopsy… or two!) the MRI also picked up on an enlarged sentinel node ( which was biopsied and positive ). I had hoped that enlargement was from my recent Covid booster.

What was causing my symptom is that one of the tumors was occluding ( kinking) a blood vessel when I raised my arm. With no blood flow the areola lost its “color” . The plastic surgeon, who is also a micro surgeon, knew immediately.

My advice for dense breasts … GET AN MRI!

Jump to this post

@anjalima , I could not agree w/ you more about getting an MRI if one has dense breast tissue. My cancer was found by MRI after Mammogram saud all was ok. My doctor was proactive and he recommended the MRI so he could see what was in there - and found the early stage tumors

REPLY
@sequoia

@anjalima , I could not agree w/ you more about getting an MRI if one has dense breast tissue. My cancer was found by MRI after Mammogram saud all was ok. My doctor was proactive and he recommended the MRI so he could see what was in there - and found the early stage tumors

Jump to this post

It should be a routine by now. It is the only way to go with all these misses! Glad you did 💕🌸

REPLY
@ssalget

After several biopsies, I was diagnosed with Invasive Lobular BC , Hr+, HER2-in both breasts in August 2021. I had both breasts and sentinal nodes removed in late October 2021. Nodes and margins clear. OncoDX is 11. I started letrozole in December. I developed severe carpal tunnel and trigger fingers in both hands, severe body and bone pain, trouble sleeping, and depression. I stopped after 5 months. My Onco suggested a short break. A nurse from her office was supposed to follow up after a few weeks. No one called so I took the summer off and did a lot of research. I decided to try building my immune system and using a natural compound called DIM
to try to suppress estogen. Along with all the supplements I have taken for years, I added Turkey Tail Mushrooms and a combination of mushrooms called Mycommunity, both from Host Defense. I added Mercola fermented turmeric and annato tocotrienols (a form of Vit E). Anyway, I just had my 6 month check-in with my Onco a few days ago. It took a few extra months to schedule. We discussed starting AI's again. I expressed my concerns about bone loss (I have osteopenia), thinning arteries in the heart, (I've had a heart attack) and the other issues I experienced. She said my chance of recurrance increased because BC was found in both breasts. That meant two breast cancers. She also said that if I wasn't experiencing side effects with the AI's, it wasn't working. She told my partner and I that if I stopped taking the AI's that she could only see me once a year for screening which is palpation of the chest area along the scar. (I did not go through reconstruction. One surgery was enough for me. I am 69 going on 70 this year.) She doesn't do any other screening. I will have to rely on my PCP for a 6 month intererval of palpation. I feel like I was" left out to dry" by my Dr. and my hopeful feelings dashed. It has been a week and I am trying to regain my sense of hope and resolve that I/We can choose what feels right for myself, my family and my quality of life. I am going to seek out a practitioner who will test my hormone levels. I do have a base line from a test my Naturopath did several years ago.

I am so disappointed in our traditional health care, and particularly healthcare for women. I can only guess that I am a lower risk patient than My Dr."s other patients. I will take that as a good thing. This is really my first experience with traditional medicine. I waded through it with my mother, and did not enjoy it. Good luck and blessings, as you move forward on this crazy journey.

Jump to this post

You mention that you'll have to rely on your PCP for physical breast exam if you don't find a less-dismissive (my words) oncologist. I've always found ob/gyns to be very well-trained in checking for breast irregularities and lumps. Do you have one you like? If so, consider having her/him do the exams. And maybe refer you to a different oncologist.

REPLY
@callalloo

You mention that you'll have to rely on your PCP for physical breast exam if you don't find a less-dismissive (my words) oncologist. I've always found ob/gyns to be very well-trained in checking for breast irregularities and lumps. Do you have one you like? If so, consider having her/him do the exams. And maybe refer you to a different oncologist.

Jump to this post

Lobular can be harder to find with a breast exam because it may not present as a lump, from what I have been told. Check with a doc you can find that you trust.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.