High Platelets

Posted by mtnlife @mtnlife, Nov 15, 2022

Good afternoon. I am new to this sight and am looking for some reassurance. I do not want to get ahead of myself. I am a relatively healthy 71-year-old woman. I was diagnosed two years ago with atrial fibrillation but that is well controlled with a beta blocker. Early in September 2022 I went to my PCP for an annual wellness visit and he ordered several panels of blood tests as I have not had bloodwork done in over two years. EVEYTHING came back well within normal ranges except for platelets which were 551. A repeated test 6 weeks later was not much better as platelet count was 530. Iron studies were ordered, and they are very normal. My PCP referred me to a hematologist who reviewed my charts. An initial appointment is scheduled for December 8. I have no symptoms of illness and feel very well. I am very active. On the one hand I think that if the doctors believed this is an urgent situation, I would be seeing someone sooner. On the other hand, there are shortages of health care workers even in the highly rated teaching hospital all my doctors are affiliated with so perhaps December 8 is really the first time anyone can see me. Has anyone in this group experienced similar conditions. What, if anything, should I be on the alert for in the next few weeks. Thanks for reading!!!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Blood Cancers & Disorders Support Group.

I am back now with more information as I met with a hematologist on December 8. The doctor suspected ET and ordered numerous blood tests. I have most, if not all of the results of those tests. The FISH myeloid panel to detect CML is normal. Other than high platelets, the blood smear is not remarkable. The genetic testing did show that I have the Calr mutation. A bone marrow biopsy is recommended so the doctor and I will likely discuss that at my next appointment on December 29. I continue to feel fine..no sympoms.
I am interested in hearing from others with this particular mutation. And while I doubt I will question the diagnosis I may ultimately receive, I may question the suggested treatment. I have started reading some materials from doctors at respected institutions who do not necessarily prescribe hydroxyurea to asymptomatic women in ET, regardless of age.

REPLY
@mtnlife

I am back now with more information as I met with a hematologist on December 8. The doctor suspected ET and ordered numerous blood tests. I have most, if not all of the results of those tests. The FISH myeloid panel to detect CML is normal. Other than high platelets, the blood smear is not remarkable. The genetic testing did show that I have the Calr mutation. A bone marrow biopsy is recommended so the doctor and I will likely discuss that at my next appointment on December 29. I continue to feel fine..no sympoms.
I am interested in hearing from others with this particular mutation. And while I doubt I will question the diagnosis I may ultimately receive, I may question the suggested treatment. I have started reading some materials from doctors at respected institutions who do not necessarily prescribe hydroxyurea to asymptomatic women in ET, regardless of age.

Jump to this post

Hi @mtnlife, It’s wonderful news that there’s no sign of CML or other blood cancers. So now it’s a matter of getting the bone marrow biopsy to examine the marrow cells. That’s the heart of the immune system and the home of blood manufacturing. It’s a beneficial test to check the health of the bone marrow.

@nohrt4me, @wa34937 @koryw208 all have ET with the CALR mutation. Essential Thrombocythemia is generally slow to develop so you might not need any treatment for some time.

It’s interesting you’ve been finding articles that suggest asymptomatic women wouldn’t require hydroxyurea regardless of age. I’m curious because of the possibility of blood clots with elevated platelets. Are they saying no treatment at all? Or just the hydroxy?

REPLY
@mtnlife

I am back now with more information as I met with a hematologist on December 8. The doctor suspected ET and ordered numerous blood tests. I have most, if not all of the results of those tests. The FISH myeloid panel to detect CML is normal. Other than high platelets, the blood smear is not remarkable. The genetic testing did show that I have the Calr mutation. A bone marrow biopsy is recommended so the doctor and I will likely discuss that at my next appointment on December 29. I continue to feel fine..no sympoms.
I am interested in hearing from others with this particular mutation. And while I doubt I will question the diagnosis I may ultimately receive, I may question the suggested treatment. I have started reading some materials from doctors at respected institutions who do not necessarily prescribe hydroxyurea to asymptomatic women in ET, regardless of age.

Jump to this post

I have ET and am CALR + . I was diagnosed at age 60, but onset likely about age 54. I am 68 now.

The doc probably will assess need for meds based on your IPSET score, which looks at age, mutation, and history of clots. Those of us with CALR clot less frequently than those with JAK2 mutation. So if you are under 60 and have not have a clot, you may be told to take a daily baby aspirin every day.

Assuming all goes well, you may not need to take other meds until your platelets approach 1,000. At that point, you run the risk of von Willebrand Syndrome, a bleeding problem. My dad developed that along with clots because his ET wasn't diagnosed until his platelets were sky high. It was quite a mess for a year or two. He eventually got things under control.

Platelets will go up, but I don't think there is any predictable rate. Everyone seems to be different. It took 10 years from ET onset for me to hit 800. By that point, I was too fatigued to work full time. The hemo recommended HU, and I actually felt better on it. I wish I had started it earlier because I would not have had to take early retirement.

There is a lot of fear mongering about HU. Some people can't tolerate it at all. You can discuss anagrelide and Interferon with your hemo. Try to get him/her to talk about medication options well before the need arises. That gives you a chance to figure out what will work best for you and what your insurance will pay for.

Good luck! It's all so confusing at first, but it gets better. I am 68 and doing ok.

REPLY

My 72 yr. old husband platelet's were: 508, 705, 892, 678 over 4 week period then back to normal. The doctors didn't seem to think much of it and it went down on it's own. Do some more research because, I know nothing about it, but it seems to me that a bone marrow biopsy is overkill. Maybe, get a second opinion...good luck !

REPLY

I was 65 years old and was diagnosed with ET/Jak2 mutation. My platelet count was
1 million 300 thousand. I am now almost 70 and am taking 1000mg per day. Mine was confirmed by a bone marrow biopsy. I take 81mg aspirin daily. Really had no symptoms. I feel good.

REPLY
@getti

I was 65 years old and was diagnosed with ET/Jak2 mutation. My platelet count was
1 million 300 thousand. I am now almost 70 and am taking 1000mg per day. Mine was confirmed by a bone marrow biopsy. I take 81mg aspirin daily. Really had no symptoms. I feel good.

Jump to this post

I just turned 80 and have been on Hydroxyurea and low dose aspirin for 12 years. It was discovered though a blood test and a bone marrow test. I go for a blood test now every month that is sent to my hematologist 60 miles away. I was on one low dose aspirin, one 500mg Hydroxyurea, then a second one every other day. Last summer I was cut back to one a day and two .5mg Anagrelide. I don’t recognize side effects except tiredness. I don’t sleep well and take 7.5mg Zopiclone.May just be my age.

REPLY
@casey1329

My 72 yr. old husband platelet's were: 508, 705, 892, 678 over 4 week period then back to normal. The doctors didn't seem to think much of it and it went down on it's own. Do some more research because, I know nothing about it, but it seems to me that a bone marrow biopsy is overkill. Maybe, get a second opinion...good luck !

Jump to this post

From my experience I found the bone marrow biopsy to be a simple procedure. I had it with only topical numbing, It is a quick, conclusive test.

REPLY
@eileen11108

From my experience I found the bone marrow biopsy to be a simple procedure. I had it with only topical numbing, It is a quick, conclusive test.

Jump to this post

My bone marrow biopsy was also painless.

REPLY

Thanks, I didn't know that....

REPLY
@casey1329

Thanks, I didn't know that....

Jump to this post

I was told it was a painful procedure. I was pleasantly surprised.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.