Aquablation: Post-surgery expectations
After decades of pills to (partially) manage BPH, I am scheduled for aquablation at Mayo JAX in mid-Feb. Has anyone had that procedure done? What was post-surgery like? What were your experiences regarding regular vs. retrograde ejaculation?
My expectations are high. My general health is good+ (71 yo), my prostate is enlarged but not massive, my PSA's suggest no cancer concerns. The surgeon expects a low-risk procedure (no incisions I believe) and a quick recovery (unless something unexpected pops up). I appreciate it's impossible to predict surgical outcomes with certainty - I would like to hear of others' experiences to help set my expectations.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Men's Health Support Group.
I’m 6 months out from surgery. Within 2 months I was enjoying very good urine flow and bladder control. No major problems. But after the four month mark, things started going in the wrong direction. My urine stream gradually weakened and it was taking longer to empty my bladder. So, just this month my urologist put me back on the Emano Flow urine strength test app. It showed that I had gone from averaging 22 ml sec max flow rate (or 12 ml mean flow) four months ago to about 14 ml sec average max or 7 ml average mean today at the end of latest round of tests. The Emano Flow tests urination over two week periods. That’s a pretty significant drop.
I have an appointment with my urologist next week to discuss my urine flow results and determine why I am regressing.
Has this happened to anyone else at this stage of Awuablation recovery?
Hello, This is my first post. So I had Aquablation procedure back on Jan 7, 2025. So far it has not been what I had expected. I stll have pain urinating, going to the bathroom double what I use to, get up three to four times a night, uncontrollable surges to go to the bathroom and on top of that retrograde ejaculation. I thought I was having only a Aquablation procedure but on the day of my surgery and in my post op report it stated Aquablation and Turp. So are the combine procedure or is turp separate process or is it used to remove tissue from after Aquablation, Right now total a bit confused with what was done, As I had idea what Turp was and had to look it up after my surgery as we never discussed it during office appointments nor prior to surgery.
This seems very unorthodox to what I know and expedrienced. I have had AEI (arterial embolization) which did not correct my symptoms due to a very large prostate and so took the next step of Aquablation on 12/4/2024. The results are mixed as I still feel pain during urination and if I exercise (primarily hard running) I have significant blood in my urine. Have an appt. with the surgeon this week to discuss. However, prior to the aquablation I had conversations with two surgeons regarding this procedure vice Turp. My understanding is that these are two different approaches. Turp was described as a more standard cutting procedure and aquablation was a newer and essentially a "power hose" procedure to break up and remove part of the prostate. Most importantly for me was that aquablation had less significant chance of the retrograde ejaculation vice Turp. If there is a takeaway for me is that the recovery time is much longer than advertised. Recommend a discussion with your surgeon as well as get another opinion. Hope this is helpful.
Yes. My urine flow has regressed in the past month (had the procedure on 12/24. Also have bleeding in my urine when I exercise hard (running primarily). The recovery has not gone as quickly and smooth as I was led to believe. Have an appt. with surgeon on the 27th of this month. Will post what I learn.
I had the Aquablation procedure two weeks ago. I had a median lobe and a size of 90 cc before the procedure. Everything went well although I almost fainted when the nurse removed the catheter on the third day after the procedure. The flow is excellent and no blood after the fourth day. My problem is UTI. I got it again. I would like to go back to the gym soon. Just work the upper body with 50% of the weight I used before. I'd love to use the recliner bike at the gym for exercise. It concerns me that people have problems resuming biking. Love to hear anyone's comments.
The catheter removal is no joke - awful to have for 5 days and awful to remove. My nurse said "wow, they used a large one like the size of a garden hose". Lucky me. Recommend waiting for about 6 weeks prior to biking. I waited 6 weeks and began spin and caused bleeding and was told by surgeon to stop. Its been three months since surgery and am toying with the idea of testing spin out. It seems recovery takes longer than what is offered up by the docs. Or perhaps they don't understand the level of intensity that some pursue in their exercise routines.
Follow up - met with surgeon on Thursday and after discussing my set back and a quick visual inspection it was determined that I either had kidney stones or calcified prostate flesh blocking my urination and reducing flow and causing severe pain. So the doc went forward with an instrument and removed this blockage which was sizeable and in several bits. This was done without anesthesia as there was concern that applying anesthesia could push the blockage further back. This was not a pleasant experience to say the least. The good news is that my flow is back to very good and there is no pain. This is a journey for sure. My next test is to continue to work out and hope that there is no bleeding. It was suggested that this material that was removed may have caused the bleeding experienced after intense workouts - can only hope.
Had surgery March 26th, 2025, )6 days ago). Surgery done at Centennial Hospital in Nashville. Great hospital by the way, everyone there takes wonderful care of you. Surgery performed about mid-day, and I was released to go home by midafternoon. I was in recovery for an extended period of time for adequate flushing and monitoring for blood loss. My progress seemed satisfactory to the nurses in charge, and I was released with a catheter in tow. My follow up was in 5 days to remove the catheter. My 5 days passed quickly and the whole process was bearable but not pleasant. I'm 68 and very active and hard for me to sit around tied to a hose if you know what I mean. My appointment yesterday to remove the catheter was pretty painless and I was out of the office in 20 minutes with a one-month appointment scheduled to check my progress. To say I was nervous about my first urination was an understatement. They scared me a bit with the, (if you can't pee, head to the ER). It was an hour drive home from the Dr. office and by the time I got home I started to feel the urge to pee. I went to the bathroom and to my surprise, it was the best pee I'd had in years. Full flow and it felt like I emptied my bladder fully. Prior to the surgery I had many urinations that left you with the thought of "that was a total waste of time". It's now the second day and I got up once during the night to relieve myself. The usual stand there and watch it dribble out was replaced by a full stream and back to bed feeling like I had totally emptied my bladder. I still have blood in my urine and the burning sensation while I urinate that most have reported, but other than that I feel like the surgery has been a total success so far. Too early to test if RE will be an issue but I seem to have sidestepped the other complications that can happen. If I can keep improving from where I am currently, I will be ecstatic. I was told my prostrate size was 120mm which is very large, and the Dr. had to remove a large amount of the prostate and bleeding will continue for a time but hopefully that is not a long-term issue. I'll report back after my one-month appointment.
Does anyone know if there are cases where there has been a second aquablation, say a year or two after the initial one?
Excellent post! Thank you very much.
One question, do you know if you have a median lobe that was protruding into the bladder/bladder neck?