Should 4+ Pseudomonas be treated?
Good morning to all. I'm wondering what experiences you've had regarding treatment on recurring Pseudomonas. I had just finished treatment for 3+ Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia and wanted to know if the treatment had gotten rid of it. I did not hear from my pulmonary doc about results of my last sputum--testing had begun on June 19th. Last Friday I went on the portal and this is what I found. FINAL REPORT: 4+ Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This is the 5th Pseudomonas since March 2019. I had a result of
3+ Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in March this year and I was put on Tobramycin for
28 days. Now I show 4+ and have not heard from anyone from the doctor's office. I contacted the doctor by portal to question if treatment was indicated.
I feel OK, no noticeable shortness of breath, am nebulizing 7% Sod. Chl. once a day, appetite not great but OK (basically normal for me). I rarely cough up anything of color after nebing--maybe pale yellow, if at all. Over the last week or so (a few times a day) I have just a very slight dry cough. Otherwise am asymptomatic. The doctor responded "I would say at this point that we should not treat unless something changes clinically. We can discuss more at your next appointment but please let me know if your symptoms change.” Any experiences out there to share?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the MAC & Bronchiectasis Support Group.
Thanks Sue, I am new and I wasn’t sure if there was more than one device. As usual you have helped once again with more advice..much appreciated as I begin my journey 🙁 thanks again !
I have a shortened bowel due to colon cancer surgery and the MAC antibiotics messed up the bacterial balance in my system so much that I continue to have big issues more than 7 months after stopping them.
After reading others' symptoms, I reslize that the pseudomonas are not causing my symptoms which have to do with shortness of breath. For example, I do not have a cough (except associated with airway clearance) and my sputum is always clear.
Thank you for that info. Very interesting!
Thank you everyone for your advice. The ridiculous thing is that, without any treatment, the pseudomonas I have did not show up on most recent sample in Dec. I sent this one fed ex and it was tested within two days rather than the previous over a month for my last 3 samples which was caused by the slowness of the US mail. Ut Texas kept telling me to mail it but I ignored them this time.
My theory is the pseudomonas feasted on the sputum during its trip across country and grew to show up as "many" although there were probably "few" to start. No nebbing. No airway clearance. Not even any breathing. The pseudomonas must have had a great trip.
My recent sample did show klibsiella another nasty bacteria I acquired in the hospital. Dr McShane said we could take care of that with a week of Cipro. Because I have been unable to get my breathing to where it was a year ago I agreed to try it. Today is day 8 since I finished and I have been having terrible abdominal pain and feeling sick most of the day. Curiously it didn't start until the last two days of the course of antibiotics.
And worse I am having an exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. So the klibsiella was not the problem and I am worse since treatment.
I've only wanted to get back to where I was before the deterioration in my breathing this year. My next step is to do a pred burst snd then 3x a week of azithromycin. Dr McShane had been against using it for inflammation in case I need it again for infection. But with no MAC showing up and my 79th bd next week it seems unlikely I will have treatment again. However it's going to take a while before getbthr courage to try the azithromycin.
There are many things wrong with this body which has clearly lasted beyond its use by date. But I still hope to get some qol.
Just want to offer some words of encouragement. I finished my last course of Cipro (the second in a month and a half) with no relief. I had also tried a course of Tobramycin in there but only lasted 7 days because I had an allergic reaction. After the Tobramycin my doctor called in a 8 day taper of prednisone. I was still not feeling well on day 8 which was last Friday and on day 9 I woke up and my oxygen levels were better and I was able to start moving around a bit more and have improved since then and was even able to take a half hour walk this week. I am keeping my fingers crossed for continued improvement and hoping that the prednisone will also help you. I am so sorry for your reaction to Cipro and your abdominal pain.
Thanks! I am better today. I have not started the pred. Maybe tomorrow.
rits ...... thank you much for anything you learn
Hi, Earlier this month while in the hospital from a MAC flare up they found pseudomonas and my doctor put me on Cipro for ten days. All my research said one should be on it 4 to 6 weeks to kill this nasty bug but my doctor was reluctant to keep me on it longer as she said it could cause damage to the kidneys. They then changed the diagnosis to pneumonia pseudomonas and said let's watch it after the course of drugs. Around day 7 I started feeling a bit better although still very weak. I've been off the drugs for a week now and while still not 100% I'm much better than I was. I am still weak and get tired very easily. Still coughing, etc. Have an appointment next week with the new lung doctors from the hospital for a second opinion.
Meanwhile, in my own research I found an article about Manuka Honey from New Zealand that claims to kill the pseudomonas bacteria. After being diagnosed with asthma, COPD, MAC and now pseudomonas with little luck tolerating the drugs they have tired, I ordered a jar of the honey. Figured it can't hurt to try and if it helps all the better. Has anyone else heard of this or tried it?
There was some success reported in treating pseudomonas in skin infections using Manuka honey. That led to the hope that it might also be effective at treating pseudomonas lung infections because people with Cystic Fibrosis, COPD and bronchiectasis are susceptible to them.
I was a little skeptical of the theory - putting honey on the bacteria on the skin (or in a petri dish) seemed vastly different than trying to get it onto the bacteria hiding deep in lung tissue. This brief report: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa50103 seems to say just that.
"Ex vivo" means "outside the body" - tests performed there showed that honey plus antibiotics placed on the bacteria inhibited growth. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a way (yet) to deliver the antibacterial properties of the honey into the lungs. That difficulty is described here: https://www.labroots.com/trending/microbiology/14893/manuka-honey-kills-cystic-fibrosis-pathogens-culture
As with all things in medicine, stay tuned for further development.
Sue
Guess I was hoping taking it as a supplement would allow the antibacterial properties of the honey to travel through the bloodstream much the way antibiotics do. Oh well, wishful thinking!