Just diagnosed with moderate mitral regurgitation

Posted by snoopy2000 @snoopy2000, 9 hours ago

I am 72 years old, 6'2" and weigh 205 pounds. My resting heart rate is around 55 and I ride a bicycle rain or shine or heat from 1030 to 1230 every day.

As long as I can remember, I've had "palpitations", maybe a few in a year, but 3 weeks ago, beginning on Friday afternoon I started having a few over a 2 hour period, followed by a 3 hour pause. This continued over the weekend and Monday morning I went to a CareNow. They did a blood panel and ECG. The bloodwork showed nothing abnormal but the doctor said something about "bradycardia", but I've been riding a bicycle 100-150 miles a week for the last 15 years, so she said my heart rate is unlikely an issue.

I was told that I need to see a cardiologist. My PCP referred me and 2 days later I had another unremarkable ECG , and given a treadmill stress test that showed "early" beats, and I was given a Holter monitor to wear for 72 hours.

Three days later, I was given an echo-cardiogram, the following day I was given a nuclear stress test. Finally, 3 days later I was provided with the results. The cardiologist said the nuclear stress test showed no blockage but was only about 85% accurate, but the echo-cardiogram showed "moderate mitral backflow".

Right or wrong, the only reason I went to CareNow in the first place was because I was riding in a cycling endurance race (Hotter N Hell 100 in Wichita Falls. TX) and it seemed wise under the circumstances. He told me I was ok to ride but only give 70% and avoid pushing my heart rate over 150.

I asked, other than that, I am generally free to do what I want physically, and he said yes, but have another echocardiogram in 1 year and contact him immediately if "anything changes" or go to the emergency room if I need to.

I asked him what "moderate" meant and he said "I wouldn't worry about 'mild' and if it was 'severe' I would suggest more aggressive treatment, but your backflow is moderate." He didn't quantify "moderate".

I still feel a little in the dark, uncertain if I should be more concerned. He said "this is generally good news" but I don't feel that way.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or observations.

Steve

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart Rhythm Conditions Support Group.

It is difficult to situate you, even with the information you provide. Statistically, in measurement of populations, moderate is the same as the range comprising all sets in 'average', so everything under a normal distribution, Bell curve, that fits between one standard deviation above and below the 'mean.' A percentage of regurgitation is what is normally given, even to the patients themselves. Or, what is more commonly called the 'ejection fraction', also expressed as a percentage.

If you held me down and wouldn't let me up until I gave my ignorant answer, it would be that your EF is not sufficiently dangerous that you're either symptomatic (because you've been exercising willy-nilly all this time without detriment that is noticeable to you) or it isn't apparently sufficiently extensive that you fit in the category where they would strongly urge you to have a valve repair. It's the same as having an obstructed artery. If one of your carotid or coronary arteries is only 50% occluded, they will do nothing except ask if you'd take a statin or change your diet, or submit to genetic testing to see if that's what's going on. But, when you get to 70%, they begin to press you to get in line for surgery or some other remedy that might be more suitable for you as an individual with certain needs and limitations. Empirically, with variation between individuals, much after 70% is when people become objectionably symptomatic or they appear in an ER in real danger....and then acting is of the utmost and critical importance.

You're not there......................................................................yet.

REPLY

You are 72. No matter how well you have taken care of yourself, parts start wearing out, clogging and leaking
I was told for 40 years I had an athletic heart big ventricle 50 hr. Then suddenly the same condition was bradycardia needing lots of tests and meds. Does athletic heart turn into bradycardia?
You are doing great. Keep an eye on your ticker. The docs are good.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.