Had second ablation - how long until a/fib bouts stabilize? Thank you!

Posted by jimbehun @jimbehun, 5 days ago

Second ablation about a month ago; still in and out of a/ fib daily- how long until stable in most cases? First ablation six months ago- frustrating- thank you for any info!

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart Rhythm Conditions Support Group.

6 months at least. Needing second so soon after first suggests doc missed areas to ablate.

REPLY

I'll give it to you straight, and I have done a lot of reading on this topic, and have had two ablations about seven months apart:

The blanking period, normally three months, is meant to let the heart stabilize, heal its various burn lesions, and to decide if it wants to play nice. At the 13/14 week mark you are given a loop recorder or a Holter monitor for a day, maybe longer, to confirm the heart's current state. You get the results to you inside of two weeks, depending on the interpreting authority.

For the heavy majority of patients needing an index ablation (first ablation), the EP will only ablate around the pulmonary veins ostia, or their mouths, where they empty oxygenated blood from the lungs into the left atrium. Paroxysmal AF is 90% probably the result of rogue cells firing away inside the mouths of the pulmonary veins, so that's what almost all EPs will want to do first crack at you. The procedure is called a pulmonary vein isolation, or PVI.

The risk of failure of index ablations, across practicing EPs everywhere, is about 25%. This means only 75% of all patients receiving a PVI from any EP are going to find that they no longer have AF. Good! The rest need a re-do. I was one, and you're one. [Note: the very best EPs money can buy have a higher rate of success, more like 85-90%.]

Why a second ablation? Because the first was incomplete. Period. The EP didn't fully ablate a complete 'circle' of burns around the pulmonary vein ostia, or he/she didn't realize your case is more complicated and that you have other foci/re-entrants/rotors located in the other walls, the left atrial appendage, or the coronary sinus, as examples of other locations that should have been ablated because that's where your signals were coming from.

Remember, or in case you don't know it already, AF is a progressive disorder in the vast and heavy majority of patients. It moves at individual patient speeds from paroxysmal (comes and goes on its own, mostly behaves), to persistent, long-standing persistent, and finally to permanent. Hearts that endure longer and longer periods of AF will begin to change. It's called 'remodeling'. It's not good. So, the idea is to keep AF from happening to the extent humanly possible. The gold standard of care now is not drugs, not even lifestyle improvements (but they are both possibly key to long term success), but catheter ablation. It enjoys the greatest success across patients.

Last thing: second ablation attempts, across EPs practicing everywhere, have about a 85% rate of success, somewhat higher than the index ablations. Most EPs will re-ablate the pulmonary veins (happened to me, but this time, ablating around the third vein, my heart went into steady NSR and he knew he'd just ablated the one small gap he'd missed earlier. Remember, they're all but blind moving that catheter tip around and touching tissue and then stepping on the pedal to activate it). Then, they challenge the heart to see if it will go into arrhythmia. If it does, they know they must 'map' the atrium and look for other foci. He'll do those spots and hope for the best.

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

I'll give it to you straight, and I have done a lot of reading on this topic, and have had two ablations about seven months apart:

The blanking period, normally three months, is meant to let the heart stabilize, heal its various burn lesions, and to decide if it wants to play nice. At the 13/14 week mark you are given a loop recorder or a Holter monitor for a day, maybe longer, to confirm the heart's current state. You get the results to you inside of two weeks, depending on the interpreting authority.

For the heavy majority of patients needing an index ablation (first ablation), the EP will only ablate around the pulmonary veins ostia, or their mouths, where they empty oxygenated blood from the lungs into the left atrium. Paroxysmal AF is 90% probably the result of rogue cells firing away inside the mouths of the pulmonary veins, so that's what almost all EPs will want to do first crack at you. The procedure is called a pulmonary vein isolation, or PVI.

The risk of failure of index ablations, across practicing EPs everywhere, is about 25%. This means only 75% of all patients receiving a PVI from any EP are going to find that they no longer have AF. Good! The rest need a re-do. I was one, and you're one. [Note: the very best EPs money can buy have a higher rate of success, more like 85-90%.]

Why a second ablation? Because the first was incomplete. Period. The EP didn't fully ablate a complete 'circle' of burns around the pulmonary vein ostia, or he/she didn't realize your case is more complicated and that you have other foci/re-entrants/rotors located in the other walls, the left atrial appendage, or the coronary sinus, as examples of other locations that should have been ablated because that's where your signals were coming from.

Remember, or in case you don't know it already, AF is a progressive disorder in the vast and heavy majority of patients. It moves at individual patient speeds from paroxysmal (comes and goes on its own, mostly behaves), to persistent, long-standing persistent, and finally to permanent. Hearts that endure longer and longer periods of AF will begin to change. It's called 'remodeling'. It's not good. So, the idea is to keep AF from happening to the extent humanly possible. The gold standard of care now is not drugs, not even lifestyle improvements (but they are both possibly key to long term success), but catheter ablation. It enjoys the greatest success across patients.

Last thing: second ablation attempts, across EPs practicing everywhere, have about a 85% rate of success, somewhat higher than the index ablations. Most EPs will re-ablate the pulmonary veins (happened to me, but this time, ablating around the third vein, my heart went into steady NSR and he knew he'd just ablated the one small gap he'd missed earlier. Remember, they're all but blind moving that catheter tip around and touching tissue and then stepping on the pedal to activate it). Then, they challenge the heart to see if it will go into arrhythmia. If it does, they know they must 'map' the atrium and look for other foci. He'll do those spots and hope for the best.

Jump to this post

@gloaming I should add one sobering thought (sorry): the literature I have seen suggests that you want the odd bit of ectopy or AF to happen in the first four-to-six weeks of the blanking period. If you go much beyond that, say near the end of the blanking period, no recurring AF or ectopy, but suddenly in Week Nine you get a long run of AF.....that's not a good sign. Again, you want the 'blips' early, not later in the blanking period. Events happening later suggest a poorer prognosis.

That sober fact said, I have seen numerous personal accounts posted here and on other health fora by people saying they had a lot of ectopy and AF for months and months, and had given up on their ablation and their EP. But, one day, a year later, they realize they haven't had any arrhythmia for weeks! After many more weeks free of AF, they begin to realize they needed more time to settle and that their EP did the ablation properly.

So, we all must trudge along a path toward resolution, whatever the end-state is to be. Some will have a breeze of it and go on to never have AF again. Some endure repeated ablations, and none seem to work (remember, the skill and the experience of the EP is probably the single most important determinant of success, not the technology or method of delivery, such as radio frequency versus pulsed field).

Lastly, I know of several people who have had five/six ablations until they saw the right 'guy' or 'gal' who stopped their arrhythmia. Don't feel tied to one EP, especially if they've had two cracks at you and you're still fibrillating. Find another EP. The two best I know, if you have the means and the motivation, are Dr. Andrea Natale at Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute in Austin, and Dr. Pasquale Santangeli at Cleveland Clinic.

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

I'll give it to you straight, and I have done a lot of reading on this topic, and have had two ablations about seven months apart:

The blanking period, normally three months, is meant to let the heart stabilize, heal its various burn lesions, and to decide if it wants to play nice. At the 13/14 week mark you are given a loop recorder or a Holter monitor for a day, maybe longer, to confirm the heart's current state. You get the results to you inside of two weeks, depending on the interpreting authority.

For the heavy majority of patients needing an index ablation (first ablation), the EP will only ablate around the pulmonary veins ostia, or their mouths, where they empty oxygenated blood from the lungs into the left atrium. Paroxysmal AF is 90% probably the result of rogue cells firing away inside the mouths of the pulmonary veins, so that's what almost all EPs will want to do first crack at you. The procedure is called a pulmonary vein isolation, or PVI.

The risk of failure of index ablations, across practicing EPs everywhere, is about 25%. This means only 75% of all patients receiving a PVI from any EP are going to find that they no longer have AF. Good! The rest need a re-do. I was one, and you're one. [Note: the very best EPs money can buy have a higher rate of success, more like 85-90%.]

Why a second ablation? Because the first was incomplete. Period. The EP didn't fully ablate a complete 'circle' of burns around the pulmonary vein ostia, or he/she didn't realize your case is more complicated and that you have other foci/re-entrants/rotors located in the other walls, the left atrial appendage, or the coronary sinus, as examples of other locations that should have been ablated because that's where your signals were coming from.

Remember, or in case you don't know it already, AF is a progressive disorder in the vast and heavy majority of patients. It moves at individual patient speeds from paroxysmal (comes and goes on its own, mostly behaves), to persistent, long-standing persistent, and finally to permanent. Hearts that endure longer and longer periods of AF will begin to change. It's called 'remodeling'. It's not good. So, the idea is to keep AF from happening to the extent humanly possible. The gold standard of care now is not drugs, not even lifestyle improvements (but they are both possibly key to long term success), but catheter ablation. It enjoys the greatest success across patients.

Last thing: second ablation attempts, across EPs practicing everywhere, have about a 85% rate of success, somewhat higher than the index ablations. Most EPs will re-ablate the pulmonary veins (happened to me, but this time, ablating around the third vein, my heart went into steady NSR and he knew he'd just ablated the one small gap he'd missed earlier. Remember, they're all but blind moving that catheter tip around and touching tissue and then stepping on the pedal to activate it). Then, they challenge the heart to see if it will go into arrhythmia. If it does, they know they must 'map' the atrium and look for other foci. He'll do those spots and hope for the best.

Jump to this post

@gloaming - thank you! Great info, now I hope for the best results over time- did you go back to exercising? What about one cup of coffee in the am? Thanks Again!! Best, Jim B

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

@gloaming I should add one sobering thought (sorry): the literature I have seen suggests that you want the odd bit of ectopy or AF to happen in the first four-to-six weeks of the blanking period. If you go much beyond that, say near the end of the blanking period, no recurring AF or ectopy, but suddenly in Week Nine you get a long run of AF.....that's not a good sign. Again, you want the 'blips' early, not later in the blanking period. Events happening later suggest a poorer prognosis.

That sober fact said, I have seen numerous personal accounts posted here and on other health fora by people saying they had a lot of ectopy and AF for months and months, and had given up on their ablation and their EP. But, one day, a year later, they realize they haven't had any arrhythmia for weeks! After many more weeks free of AF, they begin to realize they needed more time to settle and that their EP did the ablation properly.

So, we all must trudge along a path toward resolution, whatever the end-state is to be. Some will have a breeze of it and go on to never have AF again. Some endure repeated ablations, and none seem to work (remember, the skill and the experience of the EP is probably the single most important determinant of success, not the technology or method of delivery, such as radio frequency versus pulsed field).

Lastly, I know of several people who have had five/six ablations until they saw the right 'guy' or 'gal' who stopped their arrhythmia. Don't feel tied to one EP, especially if they've had two cracks at you and you're still fibrillating. Find another EP. The two best I know, if you have the means and the motivation, are Dr. Andrea Natale at Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute in Austin, and Dr. Pasquale Santangeli at Cleveland Clinic.

Jump to this post

@gloaming 🙏 thank you !

REPLY

@jimbehun
@gloaming has a lot of knowledge and personal experience. Basically not all EP’s are equally skillful. But you can have an excellent EP and still need a repeat. My only experience comes from my husband’s ablation. In his case, the first ablation “attacked” many more areas that just the pulmonary vein and he had a Medtronic loop recorder implanted at the time of the procedure to monitor his heart. He has been NSR for 5.5 years now.

REPLY

I had a RV ablation about 10 years ago. The EP said the PVC stopped immediately. I did not have any reaction to the damage done to RV which is what happens during an ablation.

Now counter that on June 4th 2026 had ablation on LV. I was told successful but to expect continued PVCs and tachycardia. EP was right. I continued to have PVCs and tachycardia right after and even right now 24 days later.

I was told by EP to understand the heart has been damaged with the ablation. It is going to be irritated and going to have PVCs and in my case continued tachycardia. I was told two months to quiet down. This is me though so cannot advise of what someone will have or not have and how long.

I am on Amiodarone which keeps the tachycardia from going above 150 bpm which means I don't get shocked at that is set at 180 with my ICD/Pacemaker. I am also on Mexiletine to help with calming down the heart and was increased from 150 mg 3 times a day to 200 mg 3 times a day just a couple of days ago and seems to be really helping (knocking on wood as I type this).

REPLY

Just curious but how long did you have A-fib before you got the first ablation? How successful was that one--did you have a period of NSR? What was the goal of the second ablation? Were you on anti-arrhthymic meds? My EP associate (whom I did not care for) said that "you have to wait at least 3 months before the ablation can be considered a "failure.") The second visit following up by ablation (with a differnt associate) was much more helpful and appropriate. The PAC's that I was having for a time after the ablation had almost stopped and I was reassured that this was not worrisome or unusual. I am 80 and my ablation was in November 2025; I have not had an A-fib episode since then. I had paroxsmal A-fib and I decided, after much research, to have it treated ASAP before it "spread" to more frequent episdodes. My advice to anyone with a new diagnosis is to request/demand to see an EP ASAP and get it reviewed and treated aggressively before it becomes more chronic with frequent episodes and requiring heavy-duty meds. That is just my opinion.

REPLY

I talked with my cardiologist a couple weeks after my ablation about the same thing you are experiencing. He said that this was not unexpected and that I was "along for the ride." After my ablation, I was in and out of a-fib for about 1-1/2 months, then rarely for the next couple weeks, then pretty much free of a-fib after that.

Hang in there, hoping it calms down for you soon.

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

I'll give it to you straight, and I have done a lot of reading on this topic, and have had two ablations about seven months apart:

The blanking period, normally three months, is meant to let the heart stabilize, heal its various burn lesions, and to decide if it wants to play nice. At the 13/14 week mark you are given a loop recorder or a Holter monitor for a day, maybe longer, to confirm the heart's current state. You get the results to you inside of two weeks, depending on the interpreting authority.

For the heavy majority of patients needing an index ablation (first ablation), the EP will only ablate around the pulmonary veins ostia, or their mouths, where they empty oxygenated blood from the lungs into the left atrium. Paroxysmal AF is 90% probably the result of rogue cells firing away inside the mouths of the pulmonary veins, so that's what almost all EPs will want to do first crack at you. The procedure is called a pulmonary vein isolation, or PVI.

The risk of failure of index ablations, across practicing EPs everywhere, is about 25%. This means only 75% of all patients receiving a PVI from any EP are going to find that they no longer have AF. Good! The rest need a re-do. I was one, and you're one. [Note: the very best EPs money can buy have a higher rate of success, more like 85-90%.]

Why a second ablation? Because the first was incomplete. Period. The EP didn't fully ablate a complete 'circle' of burns around the pulmonary vein ostia, or he/she didn't realize your case is more complicated and that you have other foci/re-entrants/rotors located in the other walls, the left atrial appendage, or the coronary sinus, as examples of other locations that should have been ablated because that's where your signals were coming from.

Remember, or in case you don't know it already, AF is a progressive disorder in the vast and heavy majority of patients. It moves at individual patient speeds from paroxysmal (comes and goes on its own, mostly behaves), to persistent, long-standing persistent, and finally to permanent. Hearts that endure longer and longer periods of AF will begin to change. It's called 'remodeling'. It's not good. So, the idea is to keep AF from happening to the extent humanly possible. The gold standard of care now is not drugs, not even lifestyle improvements (but they are both possibly key to long term success), but catheter ablation. It enjoys the greatest success across patients.

Last thing: second ablation attempts, across EPs practicing everywhere, have about a 85% rate of success, somewhat higher than the index ablations. Most EPs will re-ablate the pulmonary veins (happened to me, but this time, ablating around the third vein, my heart went into steady NSR and he knew he'd just ablated the one small gap he'd missed earlier. Remember, they're all but blind moving that catheter tip around and touching tissue and then stepping on the pedal to activate it). Then, they challenge the heart to see if it will go into arrhythmia. If it does, they know they must 'map' the atrium and look for other foci. He'll do those spots and hope for the best.

Jump to this post

@gloaming loop recorders are worn longer than a few days

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.