ADT or no ADT? What should I ask my Oncolgist?
After a Biopsy a couple years ago, I was in active surveillance. (PSA of 6.69 on Aug of 2025 and PSA of 7.74 in March 2026). I had a biopsy in April. It showed Gleason score of 3+3 and a 3+4, low and intermediate risk, Group 2.
I am leaning towards radiation(SBRT-Cyberknife) instead of surgery. I am in the process of scheduling a consultation with the oncologist. My urologist says that this route will be with a six-month shot of Lupron(this has me worried because I am seeing a lot of bad side effects and no data about its benefit). Is the lupron shot standard for SBRT treatment regardless of the Gleason scores etc? ? What should I ask the oncologist?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@climateguy
Yes, that was one of the articles that I read and you made me laugh with reminding me of his "catastrophic" comment lol.
Well, since women loose that amount of bone after menopause I guess that is not catastrophic in his opinion - it is catastrophic only for you guys, lol.
Honestly I do not know how we females live at all with such low quality of life 😂, hot flashes and bone loss and low muscle mass, no body hair on top of it all lol - I am starting to wonder should I seek help ?!
Joking to the side, if one can prevent some bone loss I think it is worthwhile trying 🤷♀️. Some bunny hopping could be fun after all ; ).
@surftohealth88 the time I heard him say "catastrophic" he was commenting on a rate of bone mineral density loss three times the rate women typically lose bone mineral density
@climateguy
Huh !!!! So sorry - I was half listening to that presentation and was fast forwarding to finally see actual suggested exercises.
However, women loose about 20% of bone density, which is far more than 3% - 5 % in men on ADT. Rate might be faster, but total loss is far worse for women.
A nurse treating me mentioned something like this, as if women experience far worse total bone loss during menopause than what can happen to untreated men on ADT. I have no idea.
I've not heard Newton say he's observed anything about what men on ADT face in the way of the total amount of bone mineral density loss they face if untreated. He has commented that fragile bones break easily and in older men it often leads rapidly to death.
A catastrophic rate doesn't describe a total amount. Eg: a speed of 120 mph on a freeway could be described as a catastrophic rate of speed which is very likely to lead to a bad outcome, but it doesn't say anything about the total number of miles that vehicle will or has travelled.
@climateguy
A recent article I read recommends your high impact exercises for everyone especially as you grow older.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@guybe Newton's 2025 book "MyExerciseMedicine for Cancer" has a 6 page chapter on Impact Loading.
"resistance training alone is often insufficient for people undergoing profound hormone suppression - such as aromatase inhibitor therapy or androgen deprivation therapy. In these situations, bone requires an additional, specific mechanical signal"
"Osteoblasts and osteocytes respond most strongly to brief, sharp increases in mechanical load rather than steady or slow forces. For this reason impact training uses controlled drills that generate short, crisp spikes in ground reaction forces."
"Footwear significantly influences how much force reaches the skeleton. Highly cushioned running shoes disperse impact, lowering the loading rate that bone cells respond to. This is desirable for long distance running, but couterproductive when the goal is to stimulate bone... ...bare feet or firm, minimally cushioned shoes can enhance the osterogenic signal"
Etc.
He describes 8 different impact loading exercises, and how to structure an impact training session and ramp it up over time.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 ReactionsI have Advanced PC and after Chemo have been on Orgovyx for treatment for 5 years. My oncologist after testing and PSA undetectable decided to give me an Orgovyx vacation. Following discussion she is thinking of switching me to Nubeqa instead of Orgovyx once PSA rises. I would appreciate any info on this decision. Is it better?
@mikejf
This is a really good switch in treatment. Orgovyx Has a lot of side effects, Nubeqa Has no side effects at all for most people. I have been on ADT for over eight years and ARPI’s for 7 years.
I am now taking both Orgovyx and Nubeqa. That has kept my PSA undetectable for the last 31 months. A couple of years ago I stopped taking Orgovyx And was just on Nubeq For eight months. My Testosterone rose to 50 and my oncologist wanted me to go back on Orgovyx because I have BRCA2. My PSA never rose above undetectable.
I know a few people, who attend ancan.org online advanced prostate cancer meetings, that are on Nubeqa alone And it works really well for them. It doesn’t last forever, People do become resistant to these drugs over time.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@jeffmarc after further thought I have decided to forego orgovyx: although Gleason is (4+3) 7, it is one core from the roi ( region of interest). 2 cores were 6 and the remaining were negative. Although the Decipher is .68 it is the lower end of the high risk and there were no cribiform clusters on pathology. I had a PSA 4 days ago of 2.4 and previous was 2.2. So to take the hormone blocker in order to increase survivability ( decrease biochemical recurrence) by 5-10% does not seem beneficial. It comes down to if this is a localized lesion that will be cured by SRBT or possibility of micro metastasis that will recur down the road. The side effects are not worth the 5-10% benefit of ADT.
@zeits53
I hope all goes well with your treatment.