Decipher risk: prostatectomy RP vs radiation.
Hi everyone,
I was considering radiation therapy vs. surgery, so my radiation oncologist ordered a Decipher test. My Decipher test results came back at .61, which crosses the threshold from intermediate risk to high risk, meaning radiation would include six months of hormone therapy.
Since I was deciding between RP radical prostatectomy vs. radiation, it seems to me that I definitely need to get the cancer out via surgery vs. doing radiation first. I can't imagine starting with radiation as first course for treatment for me at age 63 in otherwise good health, with 3+4=7 contained Pc.
It sounds like it is rare for most to have Decipher test information prior to a RP since it is a tool for accessing radiation options. . But, my guess is that means the surgeons will be more aggressive in surgery with that knowledge of high risk cells.
Big question: Do you know what I can expect from surgery if they are more vigilant with removal since they would know in advance that the cells are more aggressive?
Guessing nerve sparing is less likely. Not sure if that extends to the bladder neck and stuff like that?
Side note: A big factor I look at in my decision making for surgery vs. radiation is if there is recurrence, what are the salvage treatment options. If I have surgery, than I retain the option for salvage radiation (which looks like it would include hormone therapy). If I do radiation first and there is recurrence, than it's lifelong hormone therapy, which sounds like it doesn't blast the cancer, it just delays it. So, that tells me that surgery is my best first option.
Thanks for your help!
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@jeffmarc
Your post is so incredibly helpful! The sharing of all of this information is what makes this community such a powerful force for helping us all.
If I do radiation, it will be in combination with hormone therapy. Having all of this first person advice is beyond words. Thanks so much for sharing!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@larrypt3b
First, thank you for all of this really helpful information. It confirms my thought process that starting with surgery leaves more recurrence treatment options later. That is huge for me-so thank you!
Second, so sorry you're going through all of this. But, amazing the doctors are using the language of potential cure. I don't think they say those things casually. And wow, no major incontinence issues. One of big concerns for sure. Figure ED is a done deal.
Question for you, you mentioned that your first PET scan was not PSMA, which uses an isotope designed to target prostate cancer cells. Have the doctors indicated if that not having a PSMA PET scan is why some of the outside involvement wasn't detected? Your post prompted me to do some homework on the PSMA scan, and I see that it can miss cells in certain situations.
@jonathanack
Thank you so much-but I don't feel like I got this at this point. Still a struggle, but I'm trying to get as much information in my head as possible to guide my choice.
I can totally see going the radiation route just because of improved QOL vs. 100 percent surgical side effects.
Leaning toward surgery, but as you say, it has to be your own decision and then you live on the highway you choose to drive on. Thanks for your supportive words-it really does help.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@fritzo
The surgical QOL factors (incontinence/ED particulary) are often temporary. If not temporary, there are treatment options to consider. The side effects from radiation are, from my doctors' advice and most of what I have researched, delayed. Appearing a year or 2 later in many cases (not all). Cribriform was my primary concern combined with a decipher score of .72. That concern remains. I am on ADT (orgovyx) - before and after my SBRT. In my consultations the doctors (6 in total - as noted) said one treatment was the same as the other - it was very clear. Neither treatment statistically was better when treating cribriform - physicians from MSK, Smilo, and HHC (Hartford Health). Cribriform, Intraductal, and BRCA (among others) are concerning for patients. I opted for radiation and believe that beneficial research and treatment is evolving pretty quickly for all of us for whatever for the upcoming years hold. Frankly, I consider myself lucky to have good doctors, good resources, and am often reminded of others in this world who face far more challenging cancers in childhood or in more dire situations. Our situations are not ideal, but treatable for the vast majority. Best of luck. Better days ahead and Go Easy.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
5 Reactions@jonathanack
Wishing you calm waters as well. During the pandemic, I was not one of these people who did workouts, baked sourdough bread or transformed myself somehow. My wife has a serious lung disease and my entire focus was on not bringing Covid home to her. It was a very stressful time, like now. During that time, I didn't punish myself for not doing something amazing. We got through.
I think we have to give ourselves grace and just do what is necessary to get through the day. So, yes, Go Easy. Kindness extends to ourselves as well. Safe travels to you!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
5 ReactionsIf considering External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT {5x, 20x, 30x/ SBRT, MFRT, and CFRT}) you should get the ProsTox (Miradx) test. It separates those with a LOW or HIGH risk of DELAYED genitourinary symptoms (GU sxs) of from months to years. Acute immediate symptoms are for the most part self limiting and about the same for any of the three types of EBRT.
There is no risk guidance on internal radiation therapy ['IRT']: a/k/a Brachytherapy. There are 2 types: Temporary (HDR/High dose[short term]) or Permanent seeds Interstitial Radiotherapy (IRT/LDR 'Low' dose/long term. In my humble (lay) opinion (IM[L]HO) I suspect seeds' would be a LOW risk of delayed GU sxs provided skilled clinicians and matched facilities are hired. My surgeon laughed when I asked about 'seeds' and said find one. Go to the Prostate Cancer Research Institute, org [PCRI.org] for at arms length information on the subject, e.g. ,B a video on Brachytherapy 101. (I am not implying you are necessarily a good candidate)
Hi fritzo @fritzo,
re: you writing "It sounds like it is rare for most to have Decipher test information prior to a RP since it is a tool for accessing radiation options."
Sorry but Decipher is not a tool for accessing radiation options. It tells you how aggressive a particular cancer is. And yes, at a certain aggressive point, Decipher can help your doctor decide whether to add ADT atop the radiation.
The only test that I know of for assessing radiation options is PROSTOX. PROSTOX helps identify your risk levels "for developing Grade ≥2 or higher late genitourinary TOXICITY after prostate directed treatment."
PROSTOX Ultra tells you whether you are Low or High Risk for SBRT. And PROSTOX Standard reports Low or High Risk for CFRT (IMRT). The ideal is to score Low on both tests bc you are free to choose either SBRT or IMRT. If you score High on one of the tests and Low on the other, you still have a radiation path.
But! About 1-2% score HIGH RISK on both PROSTOX tests! We did! And the radiation door was slammed shut! I asked my husband whether he regretted getting the test. He responded immediately with "Absolutely not!"
He has an existing "weak stream" score on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) test of "5". That kind of "weak stream" plus a Double HIGH RISK for radiation!? ...yeahNO.
That said, prostatectomy is out too....
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 Reactions@kjholz They say information is power, but I guess it doesn't make life any easier.
I actually randomly found the Prostox test online and mentioned it my radiaiton oncologist, who wasn't aware of it, but said he was open to it and would evaluate if he should offer it to others.
In the process, things got flipped and the nurse had me initiate the paperwork, which meant I was paying up front. However, based on income and debt, the Prostox financial form reduced my out-of-pocket payment for the CFRT (IMRT) to only $100 instead of $500. So very appreciative. I didn't do both tests because I wasn't looking at SBRT at that point. I was fortunate that my Prostox test result was very low risk....but with the Decipher score being high risk, meaning radiation plus hormone therapy, I'm locking in on surgery. Still not a sure thing. Good luck to both of you finding a path.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionJust to report back; I had my consultation with my Northwestern surgeon last week. In regards to my Decipher score, he said that my score would have no impact at all on his decision making of how much to take.
As far as the procedure, Dr. Perry takes the anterior fascia sparing approach with a conserved bladder neck. Meaning, that the bladder neck is spared and conserved rather than being removed or cut open. The approach preserves more of the structures around the prostate, which sounds like it helps immensely with continence recovery (and much lower occurence of inguinal hernias). However, the stats for ED look to be unchanged.
In Dr. Patrick Walsh's book (kinda considered a bible) "Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer," co-author Dr. Schaeffer (who oversees the program at Northwestern) wrote the chapter on RP and describes the steps he takes in surgery on page. 205.
Started this technique in summer of 2021: Instead of removing fascia (connective tissue) surrounding the prostate (laterally and distantly, just past the apex). Then, release the prostate from the bladder. Then, nerve tissue sparing decision-which is based on what they find, plus MRI findings. If cancer is pushing out, then the nerves are more likely to be harder to peel off (like white veins on an orange) is nerve sparing is not as likely on that side. After that, the prostate is released from the surrounding fascia (connective tissue), this step helps to bolster the urethral sphincter…helping continence recovery. Next steps, cut urethra and reconnect…robotic approach allows preserving of the bladder neck rather than reconstructing.
Dr. Schaeffer even has videos of the surgery on Youtube, which I am absolutely not going to watch!
Thanks for all the helpful responses. Lots of things to worry about still, but Decipher and surgery isn't one of them.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@fritzo I watched four full surgeries before mine. Better than watching the news.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions