Orgasms after Aquablation
I had an aquablation procedure two weeks ago. I have had some urine flow issues but my doc says that all went well and I am recovering properly. There was one topic on which he was entirely unclear, however, and the internet thus far has failed to provide useful information. Similarly, my email to the aquablation developer has gone unanswered.
This seems like information that should be available readily but it is not, so I will ask here: how soon after aquablation is it safe to have an orgasm? I already am having erections, so I would like to know what I can do with them.
I previously had a laser prostate procedure. At its conclusion, the urologist was quite clear: no orgasms for 45-60 days or risk damaging my internal organs. I haven't had similar warnings this time, so I wonder if the risks are the same or less significant with the more modern procedure.
I appreciate any information you can provide.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Men's Health Support Group.
Connect

Recurring UTIs after aquablation?
Honestly, quite scary to read & I am sorry you went through so much. Your sharing, though, is very informative. It is giving me a new and different perspective to ponder....
So, in your case, it was recommended that you abstain from sexual activity for about a month - a little more? That is not so bad.....
I don't know if people also look at other prostate surgery threads, but theres to be a common issue with many of the procedures - the quality of orgasms definitely changes. I don't care at all about retrograde ejaculation (except for the first couple times, when it felt distinctly uncomfortable), but there's something up with the actual pleasure part of it. I asked my surgeon about that (I had a very successful HOLEP). He shrugged it off, but my urologist explained that it's commonly understood that there are pleasure centers in the area of the anatomy that actually releases semen, which makes some biological sense. When those are removed, there's a feeling of incompletion that interferes with the feeling of orgasm. I wish my surgeon had mentioned that, but he's very much "that's not my department" about it and I'm sure that guys might not run to get life-saving surgery that also messes with such a primal and important part of life.
Something that seems to be less understood is what neale360 says above - about the build up being more intense. Boy howdy. Yeah, same here. It feels more body-based than before and it's kind of interesting. My wife suggested that maybe it's closer to what women feel when orgasming, and I've always been a little curious about that difference, so I'll just keep exploring the feeling.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
6 Reactions@brucekn, thanks for the comment and guidance.
I have happy this post has continued to generate interest in the two years since I posted. If anything is clear from the thread, it is that I was quite correct when I pointed out that the providers of these surgeries, from the developers of the procedures through our trusted physicians, either can’t or won’t address this important topic prior to or after the procedures are performed.
Speaking out here, where Google can find links to real world experiences of men who’ve gone through prostate surgery, feels like helping to perform a community service.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@mike5450 , you’re welcome.
I started seeing a urologist after 40, and the only test was the PSA level- which was continually high, and triggered a biopsy procedure and one “atypical” sample.
Then a new urologist, and a previously unknown test- an ultrasound for urine retention, apparently more important than the PSA (and I get it that a UTI can be very painful and potentially dangerous).
In the process of pursuing minimal urine retention, I had two TURPs, the second one only 2 months after the first due to the first not working (where I got RE). In the second procedure, but only after it, I was told by the urologist that he wanted to make sure this second TURP didn’t fail, so he has ablated everything he could, short of a prostatectomy, and I would have ED from then onwards- and with a bunch of complementary viagra in my hand I left. Yep, since then I do need help with ED drugs. But the urine retention didn’t go away. Just the erections. And the orgasms.
Another new urologist, that I like and is much more up to discussing options. With the same goal of minimizing urine retention, some UroLift implants, and when that that didn’t work to minimize urine retention, the aquablation finally did. My biggest issue has been mild urological incontinence. It’s getting much better now.
The orgasms are not what they used to be, and are much more subtle- more like a relaxation of sexual urge. I take whatever I can from all of this. And the important point is to keep smiling- even when there’s nothing to smile about!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@brucekn, I have a fraction of the sexual function that I had before ablation - except during the middle of the night, when it interrupts my sleep - but at least I am sleeping through most nights without a bathroom visit. After what I endured with urination difficulty before I had the aquablation, it was a godsend but there definitely has been a tradeoff in sexual function.
That said, I didn't have to go through as many invasive procedures as you did. You have remarkable fortitude, sir. I salute you.
Too much fortitude for my own good, I think! My current urologist and I have come to an agreement- no more procedures on the prostate!
I think alcohol was involved when the prostate was designed for men!
Thank you for sharing your experience. Can you provide a link to the comment from neale360 that you mention? I cant find it. Thank you.
Sure, here you go (it's from p. 4 of this thread): https://connect.mayoclinic.org/comment/1391445/