I was diagnosed very recently that my aorta was enlaged

Posted by concern @concern, May 14 10:22am

Just by chance l had CT scan done for another issue. But when the results came back it showed l had a borderline descended aorta size 4.5 cc. Not sure what that means. I'm scheduled to see a cardiologist. I'm 63 never really had any serious heart trouble. But I'm concerned about this. Can someone please explain this to me.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Aortic Aneurysms Support Group.

@houston13

Were both measurements done by the same method? Depending how they do it they can get different results, when surgery is recommended depends on a lot of factors, usually when it gets to >5.0, but it depends on your body size, family history, growth rate and other factors, that is why it is important to have a cardiologist that specializes in aortic issues, at 4.5 you should also consult with a thoracic surgeon, someone in a major medical center who has done the operation many, many times. Unfortunately for ascending aneurysms, it would be open heart but don’t get ahead of yourself, consult with the specialists, they will give you all the details and follow their advice.

All the best to you and feel free to continue asking questions, a lot of people in this forum have gone through what you are going through

Jump to this post

I have read that endoscopic repair of ascending aneurysms is being tested in clinical trials and has been successful. I pray that if my aneurysm grows to a critical size this form of repair will be being done. They are trying to make it less invasive .

REPLY

I want to clarify l had an echocardiogram in July 2024. At that time my aorta was 4 cm.
According to the doctor the normal ranges were (2.2 - 3.8). I was told not worry unless it enlarged. Well February 2025 went to the ER because of COVID issues. A battery of tests were done. A CT scan said borderline dialation of mascending aorta 4.5 cm. But the ER doctor never mentioned anything about it. I was told all my tests were good. I posted yesterday but if the tests results are accurate my aorta had enlarged.5 cm to 4.5cm in just 7 months. Can someone please tell me if I'm in immediate danger. I'm so stressed out. Please let me know

REPLY
@concern

I want to clarify l had an echocardiogram in July 2024. At that time my aorta was 4 cm.
According to the doctor the normal ranges were (2.2 - 3.8). I was told not worry unless it enlarged. Well February 2025 went to the ER because of COVID issues. A battery of tests were done. A CT scan said borderline dialation of mascending aorta 4.5 cm. But the ER doctor never mentioned anything about it. I was told all my tests were good. I posted yesterday but if the tests results are accurate my aorta had enlarged.5 cm to 4.5cm in just 7 months. Can someone please tell me if I'm in immediate danger. I'm so stressed out. Please let me know

Jump to this post

Meant to say ascending

REPLY

Keep in mind that the measurements of the dilation are not the same every time if taken by a different radiologist of doctor. My Thoracic specialist at a University Hospital in Houston reviews my annual scan himself and does his own measurements that tend to be a bit different than the radiologists. He shows that I am around 4.5 cm but the radiologists show 4.2 cm.

REPLY
@concern

I want to clarify l had an echocardiogram in July 2024. At that time my aorta was 4 cm.
According to the doctor the normal ranges were (2.2 - 3.8). I was told not worry unless it enlarged. Well February 2025 went to the ER because of COVID issues. A battery of tests were done. A CT scan said borderline dialation of mascending aorta 4.5 cm. But the ER doctor never mentioned anything about it. I was told all my tests were good. I posted yesterday but if the tests results are accurate my aorta had enlarged.5 cm to 4.5cm in just 7 months. Can someone please tell me if I'm in immediate danger. I'm so stressed out. Please let me know

Jump to this post

As has been said, different methods Echo vs CT and different People taking the measurements would yield different results, you need to find a specialist who does the same measurement periodically to properly assess the growth rate and a baseline size. Again a cardiologist who is an aortic disease expert would be your best bet.

REPLY
@msturcken

I have read that endoscopic repair of ascending aneurysms is being tested in clinical trials and has been successful. I pray that if my aneurysm grows to a critical size this form of repair will be being done. They are trying to make it less invasive .

Jump to this post

I’m really hoping that happens, I have heard the same. I’m sure in a few years there will be much less invasive alternatives, medicine advances very rapidly. It will take a little time for those techniques to be adopted by others and they becoming proficient though

I had a brain aneurysm repaired endoscopically and it amazes me they can get all the way to the exact spot in a tiny artery in the brain.

REPLY
@23997929

Keep in mind that the measurements of the dilation are not the same every time if taken by a different radiologist of doctor. My Thoracic specialist at a University Hospital in Houston reviews my annual scan himself and does his own measurements that tend to be a bit different than the radiologists. He shows that I am around 4.5 cm but the radiologists show 4.2 cm.

Jump to this post

Thanks for your input. I just concerned of the uncertainty. I'm hoping l can at least get some piece of mind. What's your doctor's opinion of what he feels is to high of a number before it's a serious situation. The Internet can scare you to death. I appreciate getting information from someone who is going through it.

REPLY
@houston13

As has been said, different methods Echo vs CT and different People taking the measurements would yield different results, you need to find a specialist who does the same measurement periodically to properly assess the growth rate and a baseline size. Again a cardiologist who is an aortic disease expert would be your best bet.

Jump to this post

That definitely makes good sense.

REPLY
@concern

Thanks for your input. I just concerned of the uncertainty. I'm hoping l can at least get some piece of mind. What's your doctor's opinion of what he feels is to high of a number before it's a serious situation. The Internet can scare you to death. I appreciate getting information from someone who is going through it.

Jump to this post

My doctor told me surgery is normally scheduled at 5.0 cm. At that point he schedules the surgery. They normally have a 2 month wait but of course if urgent they will do earlier. As others have mentioned it is important to do it a major hospital that has full staff and is very experienced in doing this kind of cardio thoracic surgery. My local hospital and cardiology department does not have that.

REPLY

I'm seeing a cardiologist tomorrow. Hopefully l can get some difitive answers. Just know where I stand as far how much time before l would have to have a procedure. I live in relatively small town. I wish l lived near a hospital that specializes in this type of surgery. But unfortunately l would need to go somewhere else. Thanks for your reply

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.