Statin Intolerance: What did you do?
I've developed statin intolerance over the 6 months I've been taking daily 40 mg atorvastatin. I'd like to hear from those of you who also have statin intolerance about what your next steps were. Did you lower the dose of the same statin? Switch to another statin? Stop statins altogether? Other approaches?
In my case, I developed muscle weakness, energy loss, shortness of breath and noticeable brain fog. I've stopped the statin until I am able to discuss the issue with my PCP. I started to feel better after the statin had washed out of my system. Risk factors that indicate that I should be on a statin are low HDL and a high coronary artery calcium score.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart & Blood Health Support Group.
I certainly wasn’t challenging your diet regime. At the time my. Brother had that learning, it was also news to me that of all the lipids, triglycerides are the ones that will go haywire based on something you ate last night or this morning. That’s all.
Sounds like you’ve been doing great with your exercise and making adjustments to your diet.
My dad was in a similar situation—his cholesterol was normal but triglycerides were high. We learned that the “guidance” is if your numbers hit a certain amount, they’re medically supposed to recommend a statin to lower risk. He didn’t fare well on statins either, yet doctors keep saying, “statins, statins, statins,” just because of the formal “guidance.” I think it has to do with Medicare or federal guidelines.
He does a fiber supplement daily and we tried plant sterols (Cholesto-pure by Pure Encapsulations).
Actually, emo, statins are prescribed because of a lot of research - nothing to do with Medicare or federal guidelines, but they are supported by hundreds of thousands of medical professionals.
Here's a quick Mayo summary. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-cholesterol/in-depth/statins/art-20045772
Yes, I understand. I’m not disputing the research. It’s the research that informs the “guidance” from the Preventative Services Task Force that’s mention in the link you provided.
“ The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends low- to moderate-dose statins in adults ages 40 to 75 who have one or more risk factors for heart and blood vessel disease and at least a 10% chance of having a cardiovascular disease event in the next 10 years.”
I meant that because of the guidance from the task force (prompted by the research) many physicians will recommend a statin for any patient who meets those criteria, without necessarily considering the totality of the patient (any other co-occurring conditions other than those listed, response to previous statins, religious beliefs, anything really).
My family has personally experienced this because time and time again, physicians, especially new providers and when my father was in the hospital would default recommend a statin, without considering why he isn’t taking a statin—because the first statin he took triggered an autoimmune response (a rare, but nonetheless real risk of statins) and the second causes acute liver damage within 2 weeks (which was confirmed during his hospital stay).
I am really glad statins exist because they help so many, but what frustrates me about the guidance from the Federal Services Task Force is when it’s used as a blanket instruction. My family has felt pressured, especially by those in the hospital, or even guilt-tripped about statins when while they’re the correct solution and lifesaving for many people, but they aren’t or weren’t for my father. Everyone’s different though; the recommendation to him from the specific specialists who know his history and case differ from the “guidance,” and could be for other people. I don’t want anyone to feel belittled the way we did, and I felt less so when I understood where the guidance they kept referring to, came from.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-cholesterol/in-depth/statins/art-20045772#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Preventive%20Services%20Task%20Force%20recommends%20low%2D%20to%20moderate,in%20the%20next%2010%20years.
How much fruit were you eating? Do you eat refined carbs?
Fish has a lot of toxins and heavy metals.
All oils damage the lining of the arteries as well as all the animal products you are eating— thats why your cholesterol is high. The more plant based u eat the better your numbers the evidence based science shows. The foods you are eating are causing inflammation in your body
rochelle369,
While there is some truth in what you say, I don't agree with your binary summation.
In reply to @emo, @hopeful33250, @rochelle369, and @mayoconnectuser1.
I do eat lots of fruits and vegies daily via salads and green vegs with lunch and dinner, snacking on celery in between. I don't eat refined carbs regularly, but break over to having a few crackers now and the, usually gluten free made with almond flour. I've been on a special diet protocol since Jan 2023 to reduce inflammation in my body and lose weight, which was successful, and I've continued to follow the diet but am adding raw nuts, whole grains, and fruits like red and green apples, bananas, berries, melons, citrus, avocados, etc. into my diet along with more wild-caught fish.
I have not taken any statins since the three I tried caused a multitude of side effects making it impossible to function at all. I am checking with my heart doctor about the Cholesto-pure. That may be a possibility to investigate.
Dr. Esselstyn who was one of the first ones (along with Dr. Dean Ornish ) to show you can reverse or halt heart disease to eat no more than three fruit a day. I belong to a support group who follows Dr. Esselstyn's way and folks that eat more fruit their triglycerides go up with additional fruit. Also be careful of dried fruit.