Why is surgery preferable to targeted radiation?
I have stage 1 cancer, "until proven otherwise". It's a 12 x6-8 mm nodule in a location that might be inaccessible. I still have to meet with a surgeon. It showed up on a follow up CT for my Bronchiectasis. It glowed on the PET scan I got next. The trouble is, it's next to the descending aorta and high in the lower left lobe. The pulmonologist told me that if the surgeon says can't cut it out safely by wedge or lobectomy, they would do targeted, concentrated radiation. My question is, why don't they start with that? Does anyone know? I forgot to ask, or didn't think to. This surgery sounds dreadful. Thanks.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Lung Cancer Support Group.
Hi @muffyy , I'm glad that your consult with the surgeon went well. It's helpful to have that type of trust and confidence.
Now, more waiting! Oh the waiting..., but it gives you some time to prepare too.
Hi
I live in Oregon and was diagnosed with stage 3a in 2022. After much advice i understood that the only sure “cure” was with surgery that cut it all out. Because of the location of the tumor which was the size of a lime and butting up against my aorta the local surgeons said it would be “tricky.”
I was not as confident with them as i wanted. Then i reviewed major cancer centers and decided to go to Dana Farber in Boston ( my daughter lives there). I met with a top surgeon, Dr. Swanson, from Mass General who assured me he’d done this many times before but i needed the complete removal of my left lung, a pneumonectomy. It was scary but i went ahead. Now it’s 2 1/2 years later. I had my latest scan yesterday and there is no evidence of cancer disease. I enjoy playing 9 holes of golf 3 or 4 times a week and I’m doing much better than anyone expected. I walked4 1/2 miles today. If you need or want surgery go to the best you can find. Good luck ❤️