Why would my doctors recommend surgery over radiation?
How come most doctors I talk to recommend RP removal instead of radiation? I ve seen good and bad about radiation. I m low risk 3+3 Gleason,PSA was 9. Age 64,thinking of removal but radiation surgery and urologist all we’re saying I can do AS active surveillance but probably need removal in 1.5-3.0 yrs. Does radiation carry a higher risk of long term after effects?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
My Gleason was 4+3=7 so Intermediate risk, my Decipher score was only 0.38 so low risk of metastasis, my PSMA Pet scan showed no thing outside the prostate, so far I have opted for no treatment, just wait and see, my PSA went down from 6.44 to 5.12 since I cut out all sugar from my diet, my plan is to starve the cancer cells of sugar