New type of test for PSA: Prostate Screening EpiSwitch (PSE) test
First of all I want to thank all of those that responded. I has helped me in my fear and anxiety of what route to take.
Have any of you heard of the following new test called the Prostate Screening EpiSwitch (PSE) test that is showing promise as a more accurate alternative.
As reported the PSE test demonstrated 94% accuracy, significantly reducing false positives and unnecessary biopsies compared to PSA testing alone.
The PSE test aims to be minimally invasive and cost-effective, making it suitable for both diagnostic and screening purposes.
I value your opinion.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

Thanks for the quick response Jeff, and clarifying your thoughts on transperineal. If other folks have experience with ISOpsa versus Episwitch, whether medicare covers Episwitch, and thoughts on when a visit to Mayo would be appropriate, that information would be much appreciated.
@skimore, Episwitch epigenetics tells you likely or unlikely, which would be more reassuring if they'd give you the grid of testing results.
Medicare pays for the test, but not for the draw, unless the draw is done in the doctor's office.
https://cancerworld.net/new-prostate-cancer-blood-test-psa-epigenetic/
ISO/PSA looks at structural changes in the PSA and is said to have 80% accuracy.
It sounds like you've a biopsy scheduled and plan on going to Mayo after. I'd read Jeff's post carefully and have a second opinion on whether you need the biopsy at all. That would be worth contacting Mayo for.
I hope you are negative
Thanks, this is very helpful additional insight @gently
I agree with your view that getting a range(grid) over just a positive/negative would be helpful.
I have a number of positive indicators like PSA, PSA trend and density and ISOpsa pointing to additional investigation, versus a negative MRI which based on this forum is not sufficient to avoid biopsy. I am scheduled for a second MRI and I am considering EPIswitch to potentially delay/eliminate the biopsy per your and Jeff's guidance.
I am very interested to connect with Mayo, but unfortunately they have eliminated virtual consults as a first contact. So cost would be a flight + hotel + consult to consult on my numbers and whether the biopsy is needed. Based on my reading of the research and forums it would be unlikely to avoid the biopsy without a more conclusive negative indicator like Episwitch.
Thanks for your thoughts, I hope I am negative too!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@jeffmarc
Unfortunately, the spellchecker corrected this incorrectly.
It should’ve read
If the PSE tests comes back negative, you don’t need to take a biopsy. That’s really the purpose of having it. They will tell you whether there is prostate cancer in your body. With a Gleason six there may not be.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@skimore If no PIRADs identified in MRI either bad MRI / MRI reading or no significant cancer. A PIRADs of 2 is non-cancerous over 85% of the time; PIRADs 3 over 75%. Did not mention how much over 6 the ISOpsa was, but that is the breakpoint so if 6.x still fuzzy. If concerned get the Episwitch PSE since they will give you a yes or no for biopsy. It would be better if there was a gradient, but most genetic tests are "black boxes" so not unusual. A negative biopsy even random is considered definitive and eliminates the "medical necessity" of the PSE.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactionsskimore, you could get a second opinion closer to home. You have a better grip on this than I
had/have. Episwitch is easy.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction