MAC contagious question

Posted by jkarson003 @jkarson003, 2 days ago

I have been told and read that MAC is not contagious person to person. This is adverse to my logical thinking. If you could spit live bacteria into samples to go to culture and if it's in your sputum, how can it not be contagious person to person if someone sneezes on you or somehow spreads through touching of areas where coughing or human vapors occur?
How could bacteria get into dirt, then subject inhale dust and contract when direct vapors will not cause infection?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the MAC & Bronchiectasis Support Group.

I have been told that it is not contagious, though could be if you're coughing into someone's face with Bronchiectasis or lung damage. I'm certainly not an expert on this subject but how I understand it, is if you have BE lung damage, you don't have the ability to clear your lungs like those without lung damage. You have more mucus that accumulates, that weighs down and damages your cilia. Cilia are also used to clear your lungs. So, your lungs are the perfect place for NTMs to live and fester. This is why nebulizing with 7% saline is recommended by doctors who are NTM experts. The saline nebulizing/airway clearance helps clear the lungs. People with healthy lungs do not have pockets or enlarged areas with damaged cilia and can clear bacteria by coughing. We cannot. I hope this helps a bit. Bacteria are everywhere.

REPLY

I waited to answer because it's been a long time since I took microbiology and what I learned is mostly ancient history by now- keep that in mind. The infectionness of organisms depends on size, ability to survive outside host and ability to replicate in new one.

To me, seems easiest to understand by looking at hospitals' use of different isolation precautions for different types of infections. Airborne precautions are used for diseases whose organisms are so tiny, they can remain suspended in air for some time after a patient coughs and another person across the room person can breath in the particles and become infected. It's used for highly contagious airborne organisms. Patients with measles, chicken pox and TB (mycobacterium tuberculosis) get these precautions.

Droplet precautions is another category. The organisms are larger and heavier and soon fall to surfaces close to patient when patient coughs. It's used for influenza, diphtheria, and others. It's important to mask if in close contact and to clean the surfaces near patient. It's recommended patients be masked when they can tolerate it.
Both TB and MAC are both mycobacteria, but are different in size and spread.

REPLY
Profile picture for pacathy @pacathy

I waited to answer because it's been a long time since I took microbiology and what I learned is mostly ancient history by now- keep that in mind. The infectionness of organisms depends on size, ability to survive outside host and ability to replicate in new one.

To me, seems easiest to understand by looking at hospitals' use of different isolation precautions for different types of infections. Airborne precautions are used for diseases whose organisms are so tiny, they can remain suspended in air for some time after a patient coughs and another person across the room person can breath in the particles and become infected. It's used for highly contagious airborne organisms. Patients with measles, chicken pox and TB (mycobacterium tuberculosis) get these precautions.

Droplet precautions is another category. The organisms are larger and heavier and soon fall to surfaces close to patient when patient coughs. It's used for influenza, diphtheria, and others. It's important to mask if in close contact and to clean the surfaces near patient. It's recommended patients be masked when they can tolerate it.
Both TB and MAC are both mycobacteria, but are different in size and spread.

Jump to this post

I understand that. But why can vapor droplets go from subject to soil to subject, But not subject to subject. Your reply gave me 2 thoughts. Mycobacterium from subject must incubate for some time, as in a culture or in soil, before it can affect humans. That's one idea. Or maybe it is the size. From human to human the bacteria may not be viable in the new subject. Must undergo some change. But then I think.... If it's not viable in new subject as is, then why viable in initial subject? Again just trying to figure the logic

REPLY
Profile picture for jkarson003 @jkarson003

I understand that. But why can vapor droplets go from subject to soil to subject, But not subject to subject. Your reply gave me 2 thoughts. Mycobacterium from subject must incubate for some time, as in a culture or in soil, before it can affect humans. That's one idea. Or maybe it is the size. From human to human the bacteria may not be viable in the new subject. Must undergo some change. But then I think.... If it's not viable in new subject as is, then why viable in initial subject? Again just trying to figure the logic

Jump to this post

It might be a matter of load. Often we read here “I love to garden and have for years” or “I love hot steamy showers, which I take every day”. It is not one instance exposure that becomes a contagion but repeated exposures day in and day out. A constant assault on compromised lungs.

REPLY

Maybe it’s as simple as NTM don’t infect healthy individuals, who have the ability to clear their lungs normally. Perhaps there is not sufficient time for them to take hold because they are cleared out. So while we can cough in someone’s face, that individual is exposed to NTM regularly in water and soil, so the person-to-person exposure is insignificant?

REPLY
Profile picture for scoop @scoop

It might be a matter of load. Often we read here “I love to garden and have for years” or “I love hot steamy showers, which I take every day”. It is not one instance exposure that becomes a contagion but repeated exposures day in and day out. A constant assault on compromised lungs.

Jump to this post

My take on many things that does go along with what you said and what I believed brought on my BE and then MAC......'never just one thing'. Living life for instance. !
Barbara

REPLY
Profile picture for jill6063 @jill6063

Maybe it’s as simple as NTM don’t infect healthy individuals, who have the ability to clear their lungs normally. Perhaps there is not sufficient time for them to take hold because they are cleared out. So while we can cough in someone’s face, that individual is exposed to NTM regularly in water and soil, so the person-to-person exposure is insignificant?

Jump to this post

I'm talking about coughing on anybody, not just healthy people. My wife got MAC after sitting next to a hacking cougher on a plane, but they say not communicable.

REPLY
Profile picture for scoop @scoop

It might be a matter of load. Often we read here “I love to garden and have for years” or “I love hot steamy showers, which I take every day”. It is not one instance exposure that becomes a contagion but repeated exposures day in and day out. A constant assault on compromised lungs.

Jump to this post

Maybe but one day you're fine and next day positive. ????

REPLY
Profile picture for jkarson003 @jkarson003

I'm talking about coughing on anybody, not just healthy people. My wife got MAC after sitting next to a hacking cougher on a plane, but they say not communicable.

Jump to this post

Tell me a little bit more about this "...My wife got MAC after sitting next to a hacking cougher on a plane..."
What other issues does your wife have that would make her vulnerable to a MAC infection? How long between her exposure on the plane and her diagnosis with MAC?

REPLY
Profile picture for jkarson003 @jkarson003

I'm talking about coughing on anybody, not just healthy people. My wife got MAC after sitting next to a hacking cougher on a plane, but they say not communicable.

Jump to this post

How do you know the cougher had NTM? There can be many reasons for a cough that do not have anything to do with NTM.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.