How long will Lupron work before prostate cancer becomes resistant?

Posted by bruningk @bruningk, Apr 30 7:19am

After radiation my PC is considered incurable and I’m on Lupron for the rest of my life. I realize it will become less effective over time and just want some ideas about how long will the Lupron work. It is able to send my PSA back to .05. I get an injection in the belly every 3 months and after the third injection, Oncologist gave me a short break off the treatment. After three months off psa still .05. After six months off still .05. I just checked again after 9 months off and I’m now .39, a substantial increase from three months prior. I’m back on the Lupron and hoping it sends me back to where I was before the break. I guess since my Oncologist is hesitant to give any timing on all this, I would like to know how long before I have to add some other type of treatment to extend my life. No metastasis yet thankfully.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@wellness100

Seems to depend on whether you get to PSA < 0.1 and how long it takes you get there. The best is within 6 months. It means that 99%, possibly more of the cancer cell is 'suppressed'. If it takes longer, you are still ok but it might indicate some of the cancers are a little harder to suppress. Suppressed means either killed or hybernates. Mostly killed. Above PSA 0.2 you got work to do. If under that, you are still ok.
Johns defines desease free as PSA 0.5. That is the cut off these studies use.

Jump to this post

Great info and thanks. That helps me to see my case is very aggressive. I haven’t been under .94 in the 9months I’ve used the Lupron

REPLY
@bruningk

Yeah there’s no way to put a number on it but our oncologist can make an educated guess based on past experience. It bothers me that they don’t try!

Jump to this post

Two and a half years ago, when I was first diagnosed, my oncologist did make a guess on how long ADT would keep my cancer castrate-sensitive based on his past experience, but the landscape has changed so fast that experience more than a couple of years old might no longer be valid. My onco team has since revised the number up a fair bit (I'm already past the original estimate and my PSA is still < 0.01 on the sensitive test).

REPLY
@bruningk

Great info and thanks. That helps me to see my case is very aggressive. I haven’t been under .94 in the 9months I’ve used the Lupron

Jump to this post

Edit. My psa got as low as .04 not .94 like I said. Fat thumbs I guess

REPLY

I am de novo stage 4 prostate cancer in bone only. I am getting a shot in my belly every 3 months with Eligard and I am taking 600mg Darolutamide (Nubeqa). In the ARSENS trial (triplet therapy) Darolutamide time to castrate resistance has not been reached. It has been over 5 years now.

REPLY
@bruningk

Great info and thanks. That helps me to see my case is very aggressive. I haven’t been under .94 in the 9months I’ve used the Lupron

Jump to this post

Not to panic. It does take longer for the PSA to 'float' down with radiotherapy. The reason is that radio disrupts the cancer cell enzymes etc so it does not reproduce. It does not kill the cancer per se. It can as long as two years, apparently.
Dont mind me. I am just another layman trying to make some sense of the whole thing. Best consult your medical team, and if necessary second.

REPLY
@bruningk

Edit. My psa got as low as .04 not .94 like I said. Fat thumbs I guess

Jump to this post

I see. Ignore my reply to your first.

REPLY
@northoftheborder

Two and a half years ago, when I was first diagnosed, my oncologist did make a guess on how long ADT would keep my cancer castrate-sensitive based on his past experience, but the landscape has changed so fast that experience more than a couple of years old might no longer be valid. My onco team has since revised the number up a fair bit (I'm already past the original estimate and my PSA is still < 0.01 on the sensitive test).

Jump to this post

The good news is the docs are not right. The down side is we are now in the grey area. They dont know, what they dont know.
Dont mind me. I am just another layman trying to make some sense of the whole thing.

REPLY

Thank you all for the great info. One last question, my doc said incurable now since radiation failed. Do you all agree with that and things like salvage prostectomy, cryoblation, and Brachytherapy are off the table?

REPLY
@bruningk

Thank you all for the great info. One last question, my doc said incurable now since radiation failed. Do you all agree with that and things like salvage prostectomy, cryoblation, and Brachytherapy are off the table?

Jump to this post

Remember that AIDS is also incurable, but people who are HIV-positive live to old age now because of drugs like AZT.

A recent Scientific American article suggested that stage 4 prostate cancer may soon be similar (if it's not there already): a chronic condition we manage, rather than a terminal illness. Current studies like IRONMAN are collecting the longevity data that will tell us

REPLY

I understand your anxiety bruningk and empathize with you. Unless I missed it I didn't see anything about your staging. Where was the cancer located when you were scanned prior to going on ADT? I presume not confined to prostate? And what was the radiation field?

I've tried to understand the answer to this question and have come across several interesting facts, anecdotal evidence and opinions. Most of this is from memory from things I've read in studies or seen/heard oncos say at conferences or in youtube vids.

1. Disease burden matters. The more extensive the mets, the more mutated the cancer cells and less like the "mothership" they become. Thus they become less susceptible to drugs designed to starve cancer cells of the fuel, DHT or testosterone. I've spoken with guys who've had mets and have been battling PCa for many years, 25+ in one case. I think they had a relatively low, though advanced, disease burden when diagnosed.

2. PSA doubling time is a strong predictor of eventual metastasis and the subsequent transition to CRPC 2-3 years later (though you can become CR without metastatic disease). There is a point of inflection in the curve showing probability of developing distant mets versus PSADT. That occurs around a PSADT of 7 months and increases as PSA decreases further. My PSADT when my PSA took off after RP was around 8 months, so it was aggressive but possibly controllable over the long term. You should ask your onco what your calculated PSADT is based upon it shooting up from 0.05 to .39. There may be some nuances in the calculation I'm not aware of but on the surface it appears you have a pretty short PSADT. Of course this particular graph is probably not directly applicable to your question, but its a morsel of data.

3. Dr Mark Scholz made a very puzzling statement on one of his videos a couple of months ago regarding how long ADT treatments work. He didn't explain the exact context, but his comment was that these days with newer treatments the time to CR has been estimated to be around 17 years. I rewound the tape and relistened to it several times, but that was basically what he said. I'm not even sure how that is possible when the latest ARSIs have only been on the market about 5-7 years, though it is certainly possible to estimate parameters like that given data collected over a shorter period of time. I even called their (PCRI) support staff and asked about it but they had no answer.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.