Accuracy of DEXA Scans

Posted by njhornung @normahorn, Mar 9 7:07pm

I am guessing that I am not the only one facing a medication decision based on one DEXA scan with no fractures. That raises the question as to how much reliance we should put on that single measurement. I trust that sites calibrate the instruments according to the manufacturer's specifications. But we read about the importance of proper positioning. I was only asked to lie on a table with no special consideration of position. Does improper position make bones appear denser or less dense? Or is the effect minimal?

Remember the old weight charts that had ideal weight ranges by height and bone structure? Does DEXA factor in bone structure when calculating density. Obviously, there is less bone for the x-rays to penetrate for a fine-boned person than for a heavy-boned one. That could be interpreted has having less bone mineral density which may not be the case.

Any insight or other pertinent questions?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

May I ask how old you are? I'm 59 and had significant deterioration from my last scan. Am at -3 for femoral neck, -2.5 hip, and -2.7 L1-L4. Am healthy, exercise 3-5 times a week, lift weights, eat well. Am being referred to an endocrinologist, but can't get in until May. Trying to learn and understand. Feeling kinda bummed and confused on what I do until then.

Was first diagnosed when I was 40 and changed diet and got to osteopenia range. Then this surprise. Am on HRT. I declined taking boniva at the time because I didn't want to be on a med that didn't have trials for long periods of time.

Had couple of fractures when kid, but nothing since.

Open to all guidance any of you have on how to navigate and sort through all the info.

REPLY
@yogagirl57

Hello! Can someone tell me exactly is the FRAX score? I've seen it but not paid attention. Any info appreciated. Thank you!

Jump to this post

Thank you!!

REPLY
@awfultruth

I think we would all want the DXA test to be very accurate with no complicating factors, at least before we've had the test. Once we've had the test and if we have a bad score we want complicating factors to explain away that bad score so that we can have some hope that we really don't have that bone loss or that maybe it isn't as bad as it seems. At least it was that way for myself.
I paid to have Lani Simpson review my scans because I had lost so much bone between 2 of the scans. Unfortunately she said the scans were good and my bone density was dropping rapidly. At least I knew for sure or as close to sure as I was going to get that I was declining in bone density and that my efforts so far have not stopped that. Note: I have had 5 scans over the past 4 years and the last 4 were on the same machine and with the same technician so I've got a pretty clear view of how I'm doing DXA wise.

My bone density has declined to a worst of -4.1 t-score in the spine at my most recent scan. I have not fractured unless there are silent thoracic fractures. I wish DXA scans were better with no inconsistencies or worries about accuracy. I wish all the factors were known about how bone density and bone quality and bone strength and bone mass and yet unknown factors effected the risk of fracturing. BTW my TBS score is also bad. Not sure which TBS numbers are most relevant but I ranged from L1 0.984 to L4 at 1.305. My TBS scores did actually improve slightly. Still no fractures and plenty of opportunity for them. It is all frustratingly imperfect.
Still so glad I haven't fractured.

I think we have to be aware of the imperfections in all this and analyze the tests value and accuracy as best we can. And of course get the best help we can to help us sort this out. Despite the issues surrounding DXA scans I see them as very useful and not to be ignored. It's a test that provides useful information. Unfortunately many, maybe most docs do not know how to make best use of that information. It is up to each of us to try to do that. No matter what all the other factors are rapidly decreasing bone density or a very low steady state bone density are not good.

Despite doing the full set of blood tests that Lani recommended I/we could find no underlying explanation for my high rate of decline in density. A decline I could not stop despite dietary changes and following good resistance training and other exercise protocols. I chose to take Evenity and have had 5 shots so far. Fingers crossed. I'm still working on the dietary and exercise angles more than ever but I'm hoping this med makes a big difference.

Jump to this post

Sounds like you did your due diligence and came up with a reasonable treatment plan that gives you the best chances of building bone under your particular circumstances. That's the best any of us can hope for.

REPLY
@jcounts

May I ask how old you are? I'm 59 and had significant deterioration from my last scan. Am at -3 for femoral neck, -2.5 hip, and -2.7 L1-L4. Am healthy, exercise 3-5 times a week, lift weights, eat well. Am being referred to an endocrinologist, but can't get in until May. Trying to learn and understand. Feeling kinda bummed and confused on what I do until then.

Was first diagnosed when I was 40 and changed diet and got to osteopenia range. Then this surprise. Am on HRT. I declined taking boniva at the time because I didn't want to be on a med that didn't have trials for long periods of time.

Had couple of fractures when kid, but nothing since.

Open to all guidance any of you have on how to navigate and sort through all the info.

Jump to this post

How long and what type of hrt if you don’t mind me asking?

REPLY
@jcounts

May I ask how old you are? I'm 59 and had significant deterioration from my last scan. Am at -3 for femoral neck, -2.5 hip, and -2.7 L1-L4. Am healthy, exercise 3-5 times a week, lift weights, eat well. Am being referred to an endocrinologist, but can't get in until May. Trying to learn and understand. Feeling kinda bummed and confused on what I do until then.

Was first diagnosed when I was 40 and changed diet and got to osteopenia range. Then this surprise. Am on HRT. I declined taking boniva at the time because I didn't want to be on a med that didn't have trials for long periods of time.

Had couple of fractures when kid, but nothing since.

Open to all guidance any of you have on how to navigate and sort through all the info.

Jump to this post

@jcounts, you have to use the, @plusname, to direct your question to an individual post. See how I used your account name? This way, hopefully, your email will show there was a response.🤎

REPLY
@triciaot

I agree with your inference - I can’t quite make out how they came to their conclusion that one score fits all. Did you read the NIH link? - I’m not positive I caught all the info. It seemed they put more focus on whether the standard deviation, based on a 30 yo white female, could be applied to men (with larger bone mass). It also seemed that they recognized that the individual bone mass was different - I can’t help but feel it was implied that the physician would make a clinical decision on what “normal” was and adjust their treatment plan accordingly. Normal meaning an average sized white female - and if the patient is larger, smaller, different race, the score would be expected to be different. But I’m afraid that is not what is happening in a typical PCP or endocrinologist office.

The FRAX score is usually used as part of decision making for BMD treatment.
https://frax.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.aspx?country=9
I find this a rather simple tool. It is also dependent on knowing whether there has been a previous fracture. My mother had undiagnosed spinal compression fractures that did not get diagnosed until the pain increased. Perhaps the tool is meant to capture clinically relevant fractures only.

My FRAX score barely met criteria for treatment. And based on my thinner bone, I may have had only osteopenia not osteoporosis. But, for me, the breast cancer metastasis issue is now a factor. And it pushes me over into taking Reclast infusions- at least until the risk of invasive cancer is lower.

Jump to this post

Did your doctor recommend Reclast? And why not Zometa? Are you taking it for bone mets or to prevent it? Thank you.

REPLY
@brighterdays

Did your doctor recommend Reclast? And why not Zometa? Are you taking it for bone mets or to prevent it? Thank you.

Jump to this post

My MD Anderson rheumatologist and local Baylor Scott & White endocrinologist both recommended Reclast. I do not have bone mets. My spine and one hip was at -2.9, I’ve been at osteopenia for probably 15 years, so I need something. Since DCIS is known to recur, even if my percentage has been lowered by radiation and tamoxifen, I was okay with taking Reclast as it hardens the bone against mets. Those percentages are statistical numbers, not 100% accurate. It just seemed to make sense to take the med.

REPLY

I posted in the Evenity side effects thread about my talk with McCormick today. Basically, the last 6 months of Evenity as an anti-resorptive are much more potent than those 6 months on Reclast, he said, especially for the femur neck which is cortical. I am going to check with my doctor.

McCormick said he has 55 patients on Evenity. He previously said 40% have some joint pain and today said only one had pain after stopping.

My P1NP is low which could mean it isn't working well and also reflect the half dose. McCormick suggests, despite my considerable side effects, that I try a full dose again, or possibly talk to doc about 1/2 dose every two weeks, wait two months and do a P1NP then.

REPLY

I trust that McCormick is using the term "clients' rather than "patients" when it comes to osteoporosis. Otherwise he might be crossing the line into practicing medicine without a license. When it comes to chiropractic, the term "patients' would be appropriate.

REPLY

njhornung @normahorn. There is a lot of discussion by MDs about positioning and other factors leading to improper DEXA scans. I had a bad DEXA scan, but my PCP and gyno just went by the bottom DX from the radiologist that I had severe OP. They both wanted me on drugs ASAP. I hesitated, after figuring I had OP because of a drug previously prescribed (omeprazole for GERD). While hesitating, I fell about half a dozen times, no fracture. I read McCormick's book on OP, which said if there was a standard deviation between high and low values on the scan, throw out the low value. There was such a deviation. Between the book and my experience, I gambled with not taking drugs. After two years I saw Dr. Bush for a REMS scan. Before the scan he looked at the DEXA and said toss out the TWO lowest scores because of deviations between high and low, and I had osteopenia. The REMS scan also came up osteopenia. There was something wrong with the DEXA scan. If you can find a knowledgeable health care provider who can read scans properly, you may want to do a second reading for peace of mind. McCormick does that if you don't know anyone locally. I wouldn't recommend home-based OP tests of falling, like I did! I hadn't fallen in years until I got that severe OP DX. Talk about your subconscious taking over! I don't know how common the wrong DEXA is, but a second opinion by someone versed in reading them may be worth it. In my case, Dr. Bush said my two lower vertebrae were rotated and that may have caused the problems. He also noted that I am small person, and that may have an effect too.

Here is an excerpt from the NHI: Precision error is inherent in the BMD measurement itself and is largely dependent on the skill of the technologist in placing the patient in the same position for different scans. Precision represents the reproducibility of the BMD measurement and is typically calculated by measuring BMD in 15 patients three times or 30 patients twice on the same day, repositioning the patient after each scan. The LSC, a value that is derived from the precision calculation, is the smallest BMD change that is statistically significant with a 95% level of confidence. Unfortunately, many DXA facilities have not done precision assessment, and quantitative comparison of BMD measurements cannot, therefore, be performed. Furthermore, there is often a lack of adherence to manufacturers’ recommendations for device maintenance and quality control, and the education and training of bone densitometry technologists and interpreters varies widely. For all these reasons, mistakes in BMD testing are commonly seen (Table 1), sometimes with adverse effects on patient care. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3891842/

I got lucky that my DEXA scan was wrong and I followed a hunch and had access to someone who could read the scan properly. Not all the scans are bad, so I wouldn't say that they should be ignored. But if you have doubts, find a way to confirm or not.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.