Hello @atir, welcome to Connect. I'd like to invite @chadknudson, @mwear, and @juiceinjc to this discussion as they have all mentioned having polycythemia vera here on Connect. @atir, if you don't mind me asking, what sort of feedback are you looking for from other members? Were you recently diagnosed?
Hello @atir, welcome to Connect. I'd like to invite @chadknudson, @mwear, and @juiceinjc to this discussion as they have all mentioned having polycythemia vera here on Connect. @atir, if you don't mind me asking, what sort of feedback are you looking for from other members? Were you recently diagnosed?
I have been recently diagnosed and had a heart attack,partly the reason being of high red blood cell count.Wanted to know if anyone with this blood abnormalities, how often they went for phelebotomy and what were their count of haemoglobin.
I have been recently diagnosed and had a heart attack,partly the reason being of high red blood cell count.Wanted to know if anyone with this blood abnormalities, how often they went for phelebotomy and what were their count of haemoglobin.
I have been recently diagnosed and had a heart attack,partly the reason being of high red blood cell count.Wanted to know if anyone with this blood abnormalities, how often they went for phelebotomy and what were their count of haemoglobin.
I was diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera three years ago. I was experiencing symptoms akin to high blood pressure. Historically, I have never had any issues with high blood pressure. I was having occular migraines -- seeing "floaters" moving through my field of vision, something I was familiar with because of migraines but I was having them without getting an actual migraine. My blood pressure was elevated and when I checked it, I found it to be considerably higher than normal. I went to the doctor and they ran a complete panel and when the results came back they referred me to oncology which I thought was really strange but later on it all made sense. My blood pressure was elevated due to my body simply producing too many red blood cells and in addition to the excess red blood cells I also had elevated platelets. After running tests found JAK-2 mutations, the diagnosis was polycythemia vera. My oncologist has set a threshold of 45% for my hematocrit, so when routine blood labs show a hematocrit higher than that I have a plebotomy. I was on a six week schedule for those initially, and then it moved to about every four weeks. After I went on a diet that put me into nutritional ketosis, I noticed that the time between phlebotomies increased. I have been able to go 8 and 12 weeks between them while in nutritional ketosis. I can't say whether or not there is a direct correlation, but that is what I've observed myself. Others may experience different results.
Because of polycythemia had a heart attack,because of sluggish blood.but after an attack was diognised.I am a vegetarian so Keto diet might not be suitable.Did u have a weight problem?
Hi all. In December, I was diagnosed with a JAK2 mutation. Finally had my appointment with hematologist/oncologist today. They gave me a definitive diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera. I found this shocking, given that I am always slightly anemic (Hemoglobin is in 10-11 range, Hematocrit averages around 34-35. My white blood cell count is always a bit high- in the 15-25K range, platelets are typically in the high-end of normal range. Does this make sense to be diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera with anemic blood counts? I asked for the rationale, and was told (a) PV affects all blood cell types, not just RBCs, so that's why your white count is high (or those counts could be due to stress alone they said. (b) They kept emhasizing that the DIAGNOSTIC criteria for PV is "any hematocrit over 32" -- which just doesn't make sense to me, that an anemic hematocrit would indicate PV. Maybe this is just a diagnosis of exclusion? I'm very confused by this diagnosis. Thinking about needing a second opinion, in any case.
As a follow up to my question, I searched for diagnostic criteria for PV (since they kept emphasizing that DIAGNOSTIC criteria is a hematocrit over 32." They kept using "32" as some magical number. I know that internet resources aren't always accurate, but EVERY paper I have found in the peer-reviewed literature states that one of the major diagnostic criteria for PV is: "Hemoglobin >16.5 g/dL in men and >16 g/dL in women, or hematocrit >49% in men and >48% in women, or red cell mass >25% above mean normal predicted value" (reminder, my hemoglobin today was 10.7, and hematocrit 33, my red cell mass has never been studied." So, where did this magical number of 32 come from? And, does it make sense considering that value would make me anemic (not polycythemic)? Not sure if this is the case, but OLD criteria (from 1970 group), included as one of the major diagnostic criteria as "Category A criteria are as follows: Total red blood cell mass ≥36 mL/kg in males or ≥32 mL/kg in females" I'm wondering if I was literally just diagnosed with PV based on the WRONG measurement (as I have never had red cell mass measured), from an old set of criteria. This would explain the PV diagnosis, which is seemingly contradictory with my (albeit slightly) anemic hemoglobin/hematocrit. Any thoughts on this explanation, or, just in general about if/ow a definitive diagnosis of PV can be made based on just the JAK2 mutation and LOW RBCs?
Hi all. In December, I was diagnosed with a JAK2 mutation. Finally had my appointment with hematologist/oncologist today. They gave me a definitive diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera. I found this shocking, given that I am always slightly anemic (Hemoglobin is in 10-11 range, Hematocrit averages around 34-35. My white blood cell count is always a bit high- in the 15-25K range, platelets are typically in the high-end of normal range. Does this make sense to be diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera with anemic blood counts? I asked for the rationale, and was told (a) PV affects all blood cell types, not just RBCs, so that's why your white count is high (or those counts could be due to stress alone they said. (b) They kept emhasizing that the DIAGNOSTIC criteria for PV is "any hematocrit over 32" -- which just doesn't make sense to me, that an anemic hematocrit would indicate PV. Maybe this is just a diagnosis of exclusion? I'm very confused by this diagnosis. Thinking about needing a second opinion, in any case.
Hi all. In December, I was diagnosed with a JAK2 mutation. Finally had my appointment with hematologist/oncologist today. They gave me a definitive diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera. I found this shocking, given that I am always slightly anemic (Hemoglobin is in 10-11 range, Hematocrit averages around 34-35. My white blood cell count is always a bit high- in the 15-25K range, platelets are typically in the high-end of normal range. Does this make sense to be diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera with anemic blood counts? I asked for the rationale, and was told (a) PV affects all blood cell types, not just RBCs, so that's why your white count is high (or those counts could be due to stress alone they said. (b) They kept emhasizing that the DIAGNOSTIC criteria for PV is "any hematocrit over 32" -- which just doesn't make sense to me, that an anemic hematocrit would indicate PV. Maybe this is just a diagnosis of exclusion? I'm very confused by this diagnosis. Thinking about needing a second opinion, in any case.
Hello @apr931, you may noticed I merged you discussion with an existing discussion on Polycythemia Vera. I did this so your message would be seen by members like @chadknudson, @atir, and @juiceinjc who have all talked about being diagnosed with PV.
@apr931, asking for a seeking a second opinion in your situation seems reasonable if you are curious about the complex numbers that either confirm or rule out your diagnosis of polycythemia vera. Is this something you would ask your current provider for, or seek on your own?
Hello to all, I am new to this and trying to get a better understanding of PV and the wait and watch scenario vs the let treat and move forward. In late 2017 I had a venous sinous thrombosis on the left side of my brain. After 5 days in ICU it was resolved. During my stay the Drs had decided that I had PV. Thats fine, lets treat it and move forward, Im fine with that, after all I have already kicked the crap out of Oliogostrocytoma a few times. My Hemat was at 62 My Hemo was at 18 RBC elevated WBC elevated etc. I had a few Phlebotomies while I was in the hospital, no big deal. I've done all of my many follow up visits with both primary and hematologist, extensive testing with bone marrow biopsy, special testing that only Mayo can do for genetic testing and everything comes up JAK2 Negative, but yet my number continue to climb every 10-14 days. Within the last 16 months I have had 28 Phlebotomies, which I think is a lot. I have done some research on my own and found were you can be PV Positive with a JAK2 Negative test result. I am lookin for a little guidance on next steps, any help is greatly appreciated. Jeff
Hello to all, I am new to this and trying to get a better understanding of PV and the wait and watch scenario vs the let treat and move forward. In late 2017 I had a venous sinous thrombosis on the left side of my brain. After 5 days in ICU it was resolved. During my stay the Drs had decided that I had PV. Thats fine, lets treat it and move forward, Im fine with that, after all I have already kicked the crap out of Oliogostrocytoma a few times. My Hemat was at 62 My Hemo was at 18 RBC elevated WBC elevated etc. I had a few Phlebotomies while I was in the hospital, no big deal. I've done all of my many follow up visits with both primary and hematologist, extensive testing with bone marrow biopsy, special testing that only Mayo can do for genetic testing and everything comes up JAK2 Negative, but yet my number continue to climb every 10-14 days. Within the last 16 months I have had 28 Phlebotomies, which I think is a lot. I have done some research on my own and found were you can be PV Positive with a JAK2 Negative test result. I am lookin for a little guidance on next steps, any help is greatly appreciated. Jeff
I've had PV for three years and do phlebotomies generally about once a month. In discussion with my oncologist/hematologist we talked about what I might do to slow the production of blood down. One of the areas we talked about was the potential influence of one's diet. My doctor said that I should maintain my overall health to the best of my abilities and we also talked about the possibility of a reduced iron intake, since that is one of the fundamental building blocks of blood. I needed to drop some weight so I started a diet that put me into nutritional ketosis. That worked wonders for shedding pounds but one thing that I noticed was that the duration between my phlebotomies increased -- I was getting a phlebotomy once every three months instead of once per month while I was in nutritional ketosis. There hasn't been any studies on this to my knowledge, but it was a connection that I made based on my own personal experience. Your mileage may very. I would encourage you to talk to your doctor and explore what options are available to you. I didn't feel very well when my hematocrit got too high -- my doctor has set the threshold at 45% for me (greater than 45% = time to get a phlebotomy). Maintaining at 45% has kept me feeling pretty good and I'm still able to be very active (I work as a soccer referee).
Hello @atir, welcome to Connect. I'd like to invite @chadknudson, @mwear, and @juiceinjc to this discussion as they have all mentioned having polycythemia vera here on Connect. @atir, if you don't mind me asking, what sort of feedback are you looking for from other members? Were you recently diagnosed?
I have been recently diagnosed and had a heart attack,partly the reason being of high red blood cell count.Wanted to know if anyone with this blood abnormalities, how often they went for phelebotomy and what were their count of haemoglobin.
@atir, while we wait for some members to join us, you may find @chadknudson's post on polycythemia vera and nutritional ketosis https://connect.mayoclinic.org/discussion/polycythemia-vera-and-nutritional-ketosis/ interesting as he talks about regular phlebotomies as well.
I was diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera three years ago. I was experiencing symptoms akin to high blood pressure. Historically, I have never had any issues with high blood pressure. I was having occular migraines -- seeing "floaters" moving through my field of vision, something I was familiar with because of migraines but I was having them without getting an actual migraine. My blood pressure was elevated and when I checked it, I found it to be considerably higher than normal. I went to the doctor and they ran a complete panel and when the results came back they referred me to oncology which I thought was really strange but later on it all made sense. My blood pressure was elevated due to my body simply producing too many red blood cells and in addition to the excess red blood cells I also had elevated platelets. After running tests found JAK-2 mutations, the diagnosis was polycythemia vera. My oncologist has set a threshold of 45% for my hematocrit, so when routine blood labs show a hematocrit higher than that I have a plebotomy. I was on a six week schedule for those initially, and then it moved to about every four weeks. After I went on a diet that put me into nutritional ketosis, I noticed that the time between phlebotomies increased. I have been able to go 8 and 12 weeks between them while in nutritional ketosis. I can't say whether or not there is a direct correlation, but that is what I've observed myself. Others may experience different results.
Because of polycythemia had a heart attack,because of sluggish blood.but after an attack was diognised.I am a vegetarian so Keto diet might not be suitable.Did u have a weight problem?
As a follow up to my question, I searched for diagnostic criteria for PV (since they kept emphasizing that DIAGNOSTIC criteria is a hematocrit over 32." They kept using "32" as some magical number. I know that internet resources aren't always accurate, but EVERY paper I have found in the peer-reviewed literature states that one of the major diagnostic criteria for PV is: "Hemoglobin >16.5 g/dL in men and >16 g/dL in women, or hematocrit >49% in men and >48% in women, or red cell mass >25% above mean normal predicted value" (reminder, my hemoglobin today was 10.7, and hematocrit 33, my red cell mass has never been studied." So, where did this magical number of 32 come from? And, does it make sense considering that value would make me anemic (not polycythemic)? Not sure if this is the case, but OLD criteria (from 1970 group), included as one of the major diagnostic criteria as "Category A criteria are as follows: Total red blood cell mass ≥36 mL/kg in males or ≥32 mL/kg in females" I'm wondering if I was literally just diagnosed with PV based on the WRONG measurement (as I have never had red cell mass measured), from an old set of criteria. This would explain the PV diagnosis, which is seemingly contradictory with my (albeit slightly) anemic hemoglobin/hematocrit. Any thoughts on this explanation, or, just in general about if/ow a definitive diagnosis of PV can be made based on just the JAK2 mutation and LOW RBCs?
Hi all. In December, I was diagnosed with a JAK2 mutation. Finally had my appointment with hematologist/oncologist today. They gave me a definitive diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera. I found this shocking, given that I am always slightly anemic (Hemoglobin is in 10-11 range, Hematocrit averages around 34-35. My white blood cell count is always a bit high- in the 15-25K range, platelets are typically in the high-end of normal range. Does this make sense to be diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera with anemic blood counts? I asked for the rationale, and was told (a) PV affects all blood cell types, not just RBCs, so that's why your white count is high (or those counts could be due to stress alone they said. (b) They kept emhasizing that the DIAGNOSTIC criteria for PV is "any hematocrit over 32" -- which just doesn't make sense to me, that an anemic hematocrit would indicate PV. Maybe this is just a diagnosis of exclusion? I'm very confused by this diagnosis. Thinking about needing a second opinion, in any case.
Hello @apr931, you may noticed I merged you discussion with an existing discussion on Polycythemia Vera. I did this so your message would be seen by members like @chadknudson, @atir, and @juiceinjc who have all talked about being diagnosed with PV.
@apr931, asking for a seeking a second opinion in your situation seems reasonable if you are curious about the complex numbers that either confirm or rule out your diagnosis of polycythemia vera. Is this something you would ask your current provider for, or seek on your own?
Hello to all, I am new to this and trying to get a better understanding of PV and the wait and watch scenario vs the let treat and move forward. In late 2017 I had a venous sinous thrombosis on the left side of my brain. After 5 days in ICU it was resolved. During my stay the Drs had decided that I had PV. Thats fine, lets treat it and move forward, Im fine with that, after all I have already kicked the crap out of Oliogostrocytoma a few times. My Hemat was at 62 My Hemo was at 18 RBC elevated WBC elevated etc. I had a few Phlebotomies while I was in the hospital, no big deal. I've done all of my many follow up visits with both primary and hematologist, extensive testing with bone marrow biopsy, special testing that only Mayo can do for genetic testing and everything comes up JAK2 Negative, but yet my number continue to climb every 10-14 days. Within the last 16 months I have had 28 Phlebotomies, which I think is a lot. I have done some research on my own and found were you can be PV Positive with a JAK2 Negative test result. I am lookin for a little guidance on next steps, any help is greatly appreciated. Jeff
I've had PV for three years and do phlebotomies generally about once a month. In discussion with my oncologist/hematologist we talked about what I might do to slow the production of blood down. One of the areas we talked about was the potential influence of one's diet. My doctor said that I should maintain my overall health to the best of my abilities and we also talked about the possibility of a reduced iron intake, since that is one of the fundamental building blocks of blood. I needed to drop some weight so I started a diet that put me into nutritional ketosis. That worked wonders for shedding pounds but one thing that I noticed was that the duration between my phlebotomies increased -- I was getting a phlebotomy once every three months instead of once per month while I was in nutritional ketosis. There hasn't been any studies on this to my knowledge, but it was a connection that I made based on my own personal experience. Your mileage may very. I would encourage you to talk to your doctor and explore what options are available to you. I didn't feel very well when my hematocrit got too high -- my doctor has set the threshold at 45% for me (greater than 45% = time to get a phlebotomy). Maintaining at 45% has kept me feeling pretty good and I'm still able to be very active (I work as a soccer referee).