Beta blocker after successful ablation?

Posted by otiswinston @otiswinston, Dec 7, 2025

I had a successful Pulse Field Ablation in Montreal 6 months ago. The painless procedure only took 90 minutes and I now have my life back! It’s on a par with a knee or hip replacement (have had both). I’ve had no AFib episodes since (touch wood) and my energy levels and outlook on life have improved significantly.
At the 6 month followup consult with the electrophysiologist I stopped taking Flecainide but am still on Eliquis and a beta blocker (Bisoprolol) - the later because as I explained to the doctor it has had a significant helpful effect on my blood pressure. It was around 140/80 before the beta blocker and around 112/65 since being on it. It’s apparently well understood that beta blockers help blood pressure. The electrophysiologist suggested I stay on it for now and discuss with my regular cardiologist who could perhaps swap the beta blocker for something else to help with blood pressure control. I’ve been told by non professionals my energy will increase significantly if I go off the beta blocker.
I am 72 years old and quite active - playing non contact hockey where my heart rate can average 125 for an hour with a max of 154. And no AFib afterwards! I feel great so wondering if I should stay on a beta blocker or switch to something else for BP control with hopefully no adverse side effects. I will of course talk to my cardiologist before making a decision but am wondering if anyone else faced this decision and have experience to share?
I should also mention my electrophysiologist was involved in a recent study showing no increased risk from going off blood thinners post ablation if symptom free for 12 months following an ablation. I’ll be asking about that at my 12 month anniversary.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Heart Rhythm Conditions Support Group.

Beta blockers are sometimes prescribed for 'incipient' hypertension. But, no drug is always free from side-effects in all users, including me. Metoprolol definitely cramped my mojo a bit, enough for me to notice on my daily runs. It also may lead to bradycardia (HR lower than 60 BPM) in some users, but it can also go much lower, enough to endanger some users. I had to go off it when my HR tanked taking 150 mg of metoprolol daily.

A successful ablation (12 months free of detected arrhythmia) would often allow the patient to desist from taking Eliquis or Xarelto. But it's never that simple. Although there may be essentially no risk of a stroke from the left atrial appendage if an ablation is successful, the patient may have other things going on unrelated to heart rhythm that makes continuing a DOAC (direct-acting anti-coagulant) a wise choice...and a wise prescription. So this desire, expressed clearly to a qualified cardiologist or other specialist with whom you might be dealing semi-regularly, is best run past that person. If you understand the risks, and still decide to forego a DOAC, it's always going to be strictly your choice.

REPLY

Thanks for posting that link, otiswinston. Very helpful. Over at afibbers.org, we have steadfastly informed newcomers to that forum site that the very best EPs offer to either cut in half the recommended daily dose, or to eliminate a DOAC altogether if the person has no recurrence or if they have had a Watchman implanted and the six-month TEE shows no leakage. No mention of the Watchman in that article. Going forward, we might find that an anatomically 'normal' heart, no malformation or unusual geometry in the left atrial appendage, can forego both the Watchman and the DOAC after, say, a full year free of the treated arrhythmia (one full year free of AF is deemed to be 'successfully treated via ablation'). It would be a marvelous revelation because it would free up funds for people, reduce bother in renewing prescriptions two/three times each year, and eliminate the risks for uncontrolled bleeding for those currently taking a DOAC.

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

Thanks for posting that link, otiswinston. Very helpful. Over at afibbers.org, we have steadfastly informed newcomers to that forum site that the very best EPs offer to either cut in half the recommended daily dose, or to eliminate a DOAC altogether if the person has no recurrence or if they have had a Watchman implanted and the six-month TEE shows no leakage. No mention of the Watchman in that article. Going forward, we might find that an anatomically 'normal' heart, no malformation or unusual geometry in the left atrial appendage, can forego both the Watchman and the DOAC after, say, a full year free of the treated arrhythmia (one full year free of AF is deemed to be 'successfully treated via ablation'). It would be a marvelous revelation because it would free up funds for people, reduce bother in renewing prescriptions two/three times each year, and eliminate the risks for uncontrolled bleeding for those currently taking a DOAC.

Jump to this post

@gloaming I’m glad you found the article helpful. My original question was related to going off my beta blocker (Bisoprolol 1.25 mg/day). It’s a very low dose and as mentioned it has helped control my blood pressure very well. So I’m wondering if substituting a blood pressure med for the beta blocker would have a noticeable effect on my heart rate and energy levels. Even at this low dose the beta blocker certainly reduces my heart rate (resting averages 50). I will of course ask that question to my cardiologist but I’m wondering if others have made this switch in meds and what they experienced asa result.

REPLY

Highly recommend Nebivilol 5mg is what I am takingb

REPLY

Update: It’s now 14 months since my pulse field ablation in Montreal in May 2025. I am thrilled to report I have not experienced any Afib episodes (to my knowledge) since! My regular cardiologist took me off my beta blocker and said I likely would not need anything for blood pressure management. And he seems to be right: my blood pressure is well within normal range. My energy level has increased significantly since stopping the beta blocker. My heart rate has reached 170 when exercising vigorously and I feel great. My cardiologist said to see him again in April 2027 and if no Afib recurrence will likely take me off Eliquis. I am of two minds about that: I love the protection the blood thinner provides against stroke, but I play hockey, do backcountry canoe trips, x-country ski, cycle etc and cuts and falls while on Eliquis can be pretty risky. I’ll talk with him about the pros and cons next April.

REPLY
Profile picture for otiswinston @otiswinston

Update: It’s now 14 months since my pulse field ablation in Montreal in May 2025. I am thrilled to report I have not experienced any Afib episodes (to my knowledge) since! My regular cardiologist took me off my beta blocker and said I likely would not need anything for blood pressure management. And he seems to be right: my blood pressure is well within normal range. My energy level has increased significantly since stopping the beta blocker. My heart rate has reached 170 when exercising vigorously and I feel great. My cardiologist said to see him again in April 2027 and if no Afib recurrence will likely take me off Eliquis. I am of two minds about that: I love the protection the blood thinner provides against stroke, but I play hockey, do backcountry canoe trips, x-country ski, cycle etc and cuts and falls while on Eliquis can be pretty risky. I’ll talk with him about the pros and cons next April.

Jump to this post

@otiswinston I am ssoooooooo pleased to see this reality for you, Otis. I couldn't be happier. Fortunately, I'm still 'there' as well, now three-and-a-half years out from my second ablation.

I continue to learn as I go, and I'm beginning, with the help of other patient people, to understand that most ablations are successful. I don't know what the percentage is, although I continue to cite the industrial and empirical figures found on reputable sites that say it's running near 75%. I think as we go, and with PFA showing increasing benefits, that the number is going to reach a cited 85% before long, maybe five years only. The health fora, such as this one, is a place where troubled patients come for help or for tips. So, we see more of those unhappy and desperate please for affirmation, for help, for hand-holding, for advice....and we can only do some of that legitimately. It's a problem of 'self-selection bias' where only people who need guidance are likely to find this site and post of their experience. The rest are at the beach, shopping, on a cruise, or munching popcorn at the movies. Life goes on.

REPLY

I just had an ablation and I will be excited to see if any of my meds can be stopped in the future. Beta Blockers always put me in the bed for a nap (I hate this) but its like someone removed my battery and I just quit. Would like to see Eliquis go too since it is causing awful bruising with the slightest poke.

REPLY
Profile picture for deniseheart @deniseheart

I just had an ablation and I will be excited to see if any of my meds can be stopped in the future. Beta Blockers always put me in the bed for a nap (I hate this) but its like someone removed my battery and I just quit. Would like to see Eliquis go too since it is causing awful bruising with the slightest poke.

Jump to this post

@deniseheart This is not my counsel, and I'm far from qualified to give you any advice, but you might run a reasoned calculus past your EP when your Holter result in a few weeks shows your heart in steady NSR: Once you have gone a full year from your ablation and have no obvious/detectable arrhythmia, AND IF....all other factors are in your favour (no other risks for thromboembolic events due to other comorbidities, for example, and you're not already north of about 70), you could/might/wanna forego the DOAC for at least a few years until or unless it makes sense to start taking it again. At some point, almost all of us are going to start falling. It's dreadful, but you do NOT want a brain bleed or other rupture to cause internal hemorrhaging helped by a DOAC, and it might mean a few years of safety/insurance to be on the DOAC, and then you might as well stop taking it once you reach, say, 80/85 because there's not much point any more. Something along those lines.

And, most EPs will agree to stop the DOAC if you've had a Watchman installed and it shows to be leak-free at the one year TEE. (As time passes, the Watchman is beginning to slip in the esteem of the EP field. It's not quite the wonder appliance we had hoped it would be, and more of them DO leak than we'd like, so you can try to keep abreast of the latest findings through your EP).

REPLY
Profile picture for gloaming @gloaming

@deniseheart This is not my counsel, and I'm far from qualified to give you any advice, but you might run a reasoned calculus past your EP when your Holter result in a few weeks shows your heart in steady NSR: Once you have gone a full year from your ablation and have no obvious/detectable arrhythmia, AND IF....all other factors are in your favour (no other risks for thromboembolic events due to other comorbidities, for example, and you're not already north of about 70), you could/might/wanna forego the DOAC for at least a few years until or unless it makes sense to start taking it again. At some point, almost all of us are going to start falling. It's dreadful, but you do NOT want a brain bleed or other rupture to cause internal hemorrhaging helped by a DOAC, and it might mean a few years of safety/insurance to be on the DOAC, and then you might as well stop taking it once you reach, say, 80/85 because there's not much point any more. Something along those lines.

And, most EPs will agree to stop the DOAC if you've had a Watchman installed and it shows to be leak-free at the one year TEE. (As time passes, the Watchman is beginning to slip in the esteem of the EP field. It's not quite the wonder appliance we had hoped it would be, and more of them DO leak than we'd like, so you can try to keep abreast of the latest findings through your EP).

Jump to this post

@gloaming thank you for your reply.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.