ADT or no ADT? What should I ask my Oncolgist?
After a Biopsy a couple years ago, I was in active surveillance. (PSA of 6.69 on Aug of 2025 and PSA of 7.74 in March 2026). I had a biopsy in April. It showed Gleason score of 3+3 and a 3+4, low and intermediate risk, Group 2.
I am leaning towards radiation(SBRT-Cyberknife) instead of surgery. I am in the process of scheduling a consultation with the oncologist. My urologist says that this route will be with a six-month shot of Lupron(this has me worried because I am seeing a lot of bad side effects and no data about its benefit). Is the lupron shot standard for SBRT treatment regardless of the Gleason scores etc? ? What should I ask the oncologist?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

I don't envy anyone trying to decide what to accept in the way of treatment. Dr. Claire de la Calle goes over the factors she considers as she decides treatment in cases similar to yours in this podcast:
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@jeffmarc
You are right, USPSTF, dropped the ball and caused prostate cancer deaths to double. The decision to stop PSA testing after age 69 kept my cancer from being dwetected until it was aggressive. None of the USPSTF committee members were urologists or had cancer experience so they should have not made the decision as they were not trained in the area of prostate cancer.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 ReactionsHonestly, in my non-medical opinion, it seems you are on the line of AS or treatment. I would need a strong justification for ADT. As Jeff said, O would want to know if there are adverse features that warrant it.
Well, there's this...
The NCCN guidelines may indicate active surveillance is a feasible course of action...!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionIn my case (treated with SBRT) the doctor did not require or advise ADT.
With IMRT, ADT seems to be standard practice.
ADT side effects: Not only bone loss, but the calcium from the bones gets deposited in the blood vessels (coronary; carotid; intracranial)). The resulting calcification is very hard to get rid of. The hope is that with the right weight-bearing exercises, you can reduce the bone loss and the consequential calcification.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@sushilkbirla
Rob Newton, in the article: "Prostate cancer treatment with exercise medicine" https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tre.884
" ...we have reported that the combination of aerobic and resistance training has little to no benefit in preventing bone loss in men on ADT and it is only the addition of impact loading (eg hopping, bounding, jumping) that was effective. We have also reported that the combination of aerobic with resistance exercise may compromise growth of skeletal muscle in patients on ADT. This interference effect is particularly evident in these patients due to their catabolic environment, so if the priority is to induce muscle hypertrophy, aerobic exercise should be avoided or limited with a focus on higher volumes of resistance exercise....”
He cites an earlier paper of his where he reported this: "Exercise Mode Specificity for Preserving Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density in Prostate Cancer Patients" http://iapem.gr/article_files/files/19-4-2019%20Exercise_Mode_Specificity_for_Preserving_Spine_and_1.pdf
My Orgovyx prescription apparently costs the US gov't funded Medicare drug program for geezers $40,000 a year. Newton estimates if patients were referred to exercise oncologists for individual exercise prescriptions during their prostate cancer treatments the cost might be in the neighborhood of $4,000, declining as the years go by.
The impact loading prescription in that paper above is:
2 times a week "The impact-loading component consisted of a series of bounding, skipping, drop jumping, hopping, and leaping activities that produced ground reaction forces of 3–5 times body weight, and was progressive in nature. For the first 12 wk, two rotations were performed of skipping (30 s), bounding over soft hurdles (10 times, 13–16 cm), and drop jumping (10 times, 10–15 cm). In the second 12 wk, hopping on one leg (10 times) was added, and three rotations of all activities were performed. In the third 12-wk period, leaping (10 times) replaced skipping, and for the remainder of the program, four rotations were performed of bounding (19–25 cm), drop jumping (20–25 cm), hopping, and leaping".
It sounds weird, but precise. It works he says. My medical oncologist appears to know nothing about exercise to ameliorate the side effects of ADT.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
7 Reactions@climateguy
Rob Newton has spoken at more than one large prostate cancer conference.
A lot of doctors are aware of him.
I think it might be a little bit deceptive to say most people could stop taking ADT if they just did the exercises Newton recommends. The combination of the drugs with exercise can stop or delay reoccurrence. I wouldn’t want to risk my life just on exercise.
@jeffmarc Newton isn't saying exercise replaces all other therapies.
I found a quote from him: "“Exercise will never cure cancer by the way. It's an adjuvant treatment to support chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, and immunotherapy. And improve your quality of life. Unfortunately a lot of the other treatments make your quality of life worse for a while, until you recover. But exercise always makes your quality of life better”
@climateguy
Thanks so much for the "summery" of exercise 👍 !
Do you know by any chance when will his new app. be available with all of those exercises ?
@climateguy
I never implied Newton felt that way.
You are the one that said your Orgovyx cost $40,000 whereas Newton’s treatment was $4000, Sounds like you were saying one was better than the other because it was less expensive, Not that both were necessary. Obviously, you didn’t mean to say that, it just looked like it.