PSA at 6 months after salvage RT—not so good

Posted by melvinw @melvinw, May 9 10:32am

I underwent salvage RT last year (38 sessions of IMRT, Sept-Nov). My usPSA going into RT was 0.094 but I had a palpable nodule in my prostatic fossa that was intensely active on a PSMA PET scan (max SUV of 13.3). Initial alarm bells for a recurrence went off in June of last when a normal PSA test came back at 0.11. That was the first time my PSA was detectable (0.1 or higher) since a RARP in 2015.

At 3 months after salvage RT, my usPSA was 0.086. Both my RO and urologist considered that a good start.

Just had my 6-month usPSA test, which can back at 0.113. Not the right direction.

To make matters more concerning, routine bloodwork last week showed that my alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is high (150). Labcorp considers 47-123 to be normal. My Vitamin D (also tested) is normal and I have no markers for liver disease. So, those are not likely the reason for the high ALP.

Best case scenario: high ALP could be nothing (1 in 20 people have it without any disease). Bump in PSA could be ephemeral.

Worst case scenario: high ALP is an early indicator of bone mets, along with the bump in my PSA.

Am scheduled to see my RO next Thursday.

Not drawing any conclusions quite yet, but these are concerning results.

I expect that at minimum, I will be facing more testing this year.

Any thoughts, similar results/experience?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for melvinw @melvinw

Yet another update on this confounding PSA journey.

Just got yesterday’s (May 20) PSA test result back—0.100.

If you calculate the average of my two previous post-salvage RT values (0.086 and 0.113), it comes to 0.100.

From the three post-RT values to date, it seems that my PSA really isn’t budging one way other the other. Recall that going into RT my PSA was 0.094, and 3 months before that, at the first suspicion of a relapse, my PSA was 0.11 (standard Quest test, not Labcorp ultra sensitive test). My PSA seems to be stuck at 0.1 with a variance of 0.013.

Will be discussing the new result with my RO soon.

The question in my mind is, why has my PSA not dropped following RT and seems to be “stuck”? I have three hypotheses regarding that.

1 - the tumor in my prostate bed consists of indolent cancer. If the cancer is non-aggressive, then the cells are not dividing rapidly. If they are not dividing all that much, then they are not dying from the radiation induced damage to the cellular DNA. This is consistent with the fact that my relapse didn’t occur until ten years after my RARP. In this scenario, I might see a gradual decline in my PSA over a few years. A PSMA PET scan probably would look similar to my initial scan from last summer.

2 - the tumor in my prostate bed was whacked by the radiation but I have a distant met or mets that are producing some PSA. At this point, they may well be micro-mets, and with my relatively low PSA, they would not be likely to show up on a PSMA PET scan. But, if the original tumor is dying off, then there might be scan evidence for that (either smaller spot or lower maximum SUV). PSA should rise over time if this is the case. This hypothesis is also consistent with my elevated ALP (discussed in original post).

3 - radiation has damaged the cancer cells in the tumor but they are able to repair the DNA before dividing. Again, sort of a steady-state condition like hypothesis 1, but over time the cancer may overcome the radiation damage and grow and spread. In this scenario, I might expect to see a rising PSA over time after a period of stasis. A PSMA PET scan now probably would show little change since last summer's scan.

So, at this point, I am not sure another PSMA PET scan would reveal anything telling. Given that there is an insurance co-pay of some $200, I am less than eager to proceed with a scan at present, unless my RO can convince me that we might learn something useful.

However, frequent PSA testing (i.e., monthly) still seems like an intelligent, and no cost, way forward for now. More data are needed over time to see if my PSA is trending up, down, or just holding steady around 0.1.

All a bit puzzling, but the good news is that I am not really looking at rising PSA…yet. And I’ve heard of several cases where it took years for PSA to bottom out following salvage radiation. Not the norm, but then my case certainly qualifies for being outside the norm.

As always, I welcome your thoughts, experiences and insights.

Mel

Jump to this post

@melvinw
What you’re seeing is not unusual after having radiation. I know some people that have waited three years before their PSA hit the rock bottom point. You are doing just fine and .1 may be your bottom. After radiation, they do not consider doing anything until it hits two points above the bottom, which would be 2.1.

I know many other people whose PSA never became undetectable after having radiation. It does reach a low point and stays there.

REPLY
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@melvinw
What you’re seeing is not unusual after having radiation. I know some people that have waited three years before their PSA hit the rock bottom point. You are doing just fine and .1 may be your bottom. After radiation, they do not consider doing anything until it hits two points above the bottom, which would be 2.1.

I know many other people whose PSA never became undetectable after having radiation. It does reach a low point and stays there.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc Thanks Jeff. With this most recent value of 0.100, I am certainly leaning toward what you have suggested.

I guess the odd thing to me is that my PSA is essentially the same before and after radiation. Not what I expected to happen, but then dealing with all things cancer is a constant learning curve. My expectations are constantly being educated.

One thing I’ve learned in the past year is that eradication of prostate cancer once it is outside the prostate is a difficult goal, but keeping it in check is often achievable. You learn to live with it, and aim to stay one step ahead of it. You work to accept it as part of your life, without making it your entire life—yet another moving target.

If my PSA just wiggles around 0.1 forever, then I am fine with that.

Thanks for all your insights!

REPLY
Profile picture for melvinw @melvinw

@jeffmarc Thanks Jeff. With this most recent value of 0.100, I am certainly leaning toward what you have suggested.

I guess the odd thing to me is that my PSA is essentially the same before and after radiation. Not what I expected to happen, but then dealing with all things cancer is a constant learning curve. My expectations are constantly being educated.

One thing I’ve learned in the past year is that eradication of prostate cancer once it is outside the prostate is a difficult goal, but keeping it in check is often achievable. You learn to live with it, and aim to stay one step ahead of it. You work to accept it as part of your life, without making it your entire life—yet another moving target.

If my PSA just wiggles around 0.1 forever, then I am fine with that.

Thanks for all your insights!

Jump to this post

@melvinw Test, retest, and test again. It’s all you can do until you either see a definite change in PSA value or a velocity upward which would be a real indicator of cancerous cells dividing. Other than that, patience is your best bet!
Phil

REPLY
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@melvinw Test, retest, and test again. It’s all you can do until you either see a definite change in PSA value or a velocity upward which would be a real indicator of cancerous cells dividing. Other than that, patience is your best bet!
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil Yup, and I’m going to push for testing ALP along with PSA as well given that it has been rising over the the past couple of years and is well out of range.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.