Newly diagnosed stage 2. Trying to decide on a treatment plan.

Posted by 172sar @172sar, Mar 31 10:15am

Hello, I was diagnosed last month with stage 2 prostate cancer. My doctor said I had 3 options, radiation, removal or observation. He seemed to be a proponent of removal since I'm 53 years old and in decent health. I'm trying to get some feedback from people with experience. Thank You

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for 172sar @172sar

@jeffmarc
I've requested the biopsy results, thanks for the feedback.

Jump to this post

@172sar
If your medical services use MyChart, it might be listed under test results.

The fact that you are a 3+4 and have such a low decipher means that Treatment should be very effective for you. Leaving radiation should be all you need. Speak to a radiation oncologist, and a urologist that does surgery to get their opinions.

The number of 3+4 and 3+3 in your biopsy are important things. There are other issues as well that could be important so that that’s why it’s good to post it.

REPLY
Profile picture for mpersonne @mpersonne

Your report sounds a lot like mine, and I was diagnosed In January. Im 57yrs old, and im having my prostate removed in 13 days. When all this started, and when I still didnt know if it was cancer or not, I already had it in my mind i was going to do radiation treatments if positive, but after hearing if the cancer comes back years later, then surgery is mostly out of the question. Im still young, and since my cancer is isolated to just the prostate, i chose to to just get it out of my body as fast as i can. I also had the choice to go on active surveillance, but i didnt want it to have a chance to grow and spread, even at a slow pace. You have come to the right place, for these people on this forum have really set my mind at ease, and helped making my decision easier for me. good luck my friend.

Jump to this post

@mpersonne They say when younger and good health surgery is often the best treatment. But I've read around 50% of men that have RP end up needing radiation anyway. I'm older but after much research seeing HDR brachytherapy, 23-25 IMRT radiation sessions and maybe ADT gives localized prostate cancer patients a 90%+ "proven" 10 yr success "cure" rate that took surgery off the table for me. Wishing you the best.

REPLY
Profile picture for copyman @copyman

@mpersonne They say when younger and good health surgery is often the best treatment. But I've read around 50% of men that have RP end up needing radiation anyway. I'm older but after much research seeing HDR brachytherapy, 23-25 IMRT radiation sessions and maybe ADT gives localized prostate cancer patients a 90%+ "proven" 10 yr success "cure" rate that took surgery off the table for me. Wishing you the best.

Jump to this post

@copyman
If your cancer is isolated to the prostate, and you are older then five sessions of SBRT radiation can give you many years undetectable, frequently good for 10 years. IMRT plus brachytherapy Is also a good solution, but may be more than you need.

You don’t mention your Gleason score, That is pretty important when it comes to making decisions. Getting a decipher score is also a good way to find out what your chance of a reoccurrence is. If you have a high Gleason score than ADT is sort of essential if you have radiation.

Were any of these things found in the biopsy intraductal, ductal, large cribriform, Seminal vesicle invasion, EPE or ECE. (Extraprostatic extensions extra capsular extensions). They can make the cancer much more aggressive.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.