Anyone considered bilateral orchiectomy: Why or why not?

Posted by rxharleydude @rxharleydude, Sep 21, 2022

Been treated for metastatic prostate cancer for the past 11 years. 82 yo & had a total prostatectomy. Have been successfully treated with Lupron for the past 10 yrs and Zytiga added about a year ago. Considering a bilateral orchiectomy to be able to hopefully get off the Lupron/Ellegard (very painful option compared to Lupron)
Has anyone considered this option & if not, why?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@sbd
It is not mandatory to have an ARSI but if your PSA starts rising, it is the main solution right now for you to keep your PSA down.

Many people who have prostate cancer and are on ADT, which keeps their testosterone almost undetectable, still become castrate resistant And require an ARSI or their PSA will start rising. That happened to me, First, I went on Zytiga Which kept my PSA down, but not undetectable for 2 1/2 years. I moved on to Nubeqa Which is kept me undetectable for two years. I know many people that have moderate testosterone levels and are on Nubeqa Alone, and it keeps their PSA undetectable.

An ARSI like Nubeqa Has very few side effects and doesn’t pass the blood brain barrier so it doesn’t cause brain fog and keeps the PSA down quite reliably.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc
Thank you Jeff, that's helpful. I was also trying to find a post where you had commented, that adding ARSI or APRI at the initial treatment (ADT + RT), helps in better control or probably in OS. I could be wrong...

REPLY
Profile picture for sbd @sbd

@jeffmarc
Thank you Jeff, that's helpful. I was also trying to find a post where you had commented, that adding ARSI or APRI at the initial treatment (ADT + RT), helps in better control or probably in OS. I could be wrong...

Jump to this post

@sbd
Adding an ARSI (ARPI is the same thing) when you are on ADT has been shown to greatly extend the amount of time it takes to become castrate resistant.

Median survival after becoming castrate resistant is two years. Happened to me six years ago.

REPLY

My first cancer (2001) took my left testicle. Now it's aggressive early prostate cancer. Given the side effects of suggested medication, I am considering having the other testicle removed. I read that the survival rate is about the same, but I think my quality of life might be better this way.
Anyone with comments about the down side of orchiectomy? Some places I read of simple removal by a cut in the scrotum, which seems a lot simpler than the radical orchiectomy I had in 2001. That entailed cutting through the abdomen, and took some time to heal.

REPLY

We are in dillema. My father 76 years old with high blood, glucose and chollesteral, just diagnose with Prostate cancer at one side of prostate, Gleason score 8, localised no spread out. We had seen Oncology, and Urologly. The Oncology suggest to do Radiology 20 times (MRIT) and follow by hormon. Urology suggest Surgery. Both doctors give contradicting opinion. These group of doctor from both side, i am not sure are they really independant ?

REPLY

Urologist mentioned if do radio now, if cancer coming back we cant do surgery anymore.
While Oncology mention, with his age, high blood and glucose, it is challenging to do surgery.
They claim radio had radio both side and upper part of prostate. Should not come back to this area again. Seek doctor member opinion

REPLY
Profile picture for dale1618 @dale1618

My first cancer (2001) took my left testicle. Now it's aggressive early prostate cancer. Given the side effects of suggested medication, I am considering having the other testicle removed. I read that the survival rate is about the same, but I think my quality of life might be better this way.
Anyone with comments about the down side of orchiectomy? Some places I read of simple removal by a cut in the scrotum, which seems a lot simpler than the radical orchiectomy I had in 2001. That entailed cutting through the abdomen, and took some time to heal.

Jump to this post

@dale1618
Well, it does sound like a good answer. There are issues with doing that. Removing both testicles will eliminate testosterone for life. Many prostate cancer patients only need to eliminate their testosterone for a year or two, They can then get it back and restore their energy and any other side effects they’ve had from low testosterone. Are you sure that you never need to have your testosterone back that your cancer is so aggressive that you will be on ADT for life? That did happen in my case because I have a genetic problem, but most people can get off ADT and get their testosterone back.

When you have no testosterone, it doesn’t matter whether you are on ADT or have no testicles, You will have the side effects that people have with very low testosterone. Those include

Hot flashes
Fatigue
Muscle deterioration
Bone weakening
Brain fog
Depression
Weight gain
Joint pain
Difficulty in breathing

Not all of these side effects occur to everyone on the drugs. Most of them are just things you have to be aware of and circumvent. I run on the track twice a day, 1 mile at least, to help prevent bone weakening, fatigue and muscle deterioration. I also go to the gym three days a week (usually) and spend an hour with all different types of weight exercises. One thing that happens is people get a beer belly from the muscle deterioration, I do a lot of sit-ups to try andoffset that.

In my experience, they do not cut the scrotum to remove a testicle they go into the stomach next to the penis and remove it that way. I suppose they could remove it directly through the scrotum, but for some reason that isn’t the technique I’ve seen done.

REPLY
Profile picture for kingsiang @kingsiang

We are in dillema. My father 76 years old with high blood, glucose and chollesteral, just diagnose with Prostate cancer at one side of prostate, Gleason score 8, localised no spread out. We had seen Oncology, and Urologly. The Oncology suggest to do Radiology 20 times (MRIT) and follow by hormon. Urology suggest Surgery. Both doctors give contradicting opinion. These group of doctor from both side, i am not sure are they really independant ?

Jump to this post

@kingsiang
I got prostate cancer at 62 and had surgery, That was followed by radiation 3 1/2 years later. I have a genetic problem that causes my cancer to keep coming back, so that was probably the best choice.

My brother got prostate cancer at 77, He was on active surveillance for six years before. He had a Gleason 4+3 and had 5 sessions of SBRT radiation. Three years later, his PSA has stayed stable. There is Usually no need at that age to do IMRT radiation. SBRT is just as effective and actually kills the cancer cells more aggressively. They usually don’t like to do surgery on somebody that’s 76, The long-term results are just as good with radiation.

You may need to find another center of excellence so that you can Have the option of SBRT radiation. You should talk to your radiation oncologist about this.

Yes, they do usually want you on hormone therapy (ADT) after radiation, for a Gleason eight they recommend 18 months. In some cases that may not work well. It can affect your blood sugar And cholesterol. The drugs I have taken for prostate cancer gave me high blood pressure, but I take three pills twice a day and they keep my blood pressure quite under control. You can control these problems by eating carefully, Watching how much sugar and cholesterol are in food you eat. I have very low cholesterol and a very normal blood sugar But I’m very careful about what I eat.

I am 78 and run 1 mile twice a day every day. I also go to the gym three days a week to do weight training. If you go on hormone therapy, you really need to exercise and do weight training or your muscles will deteriorate and you will frequently have fatigue. I’ve been on hormone therapy for eight years because my cancer keeps coming back due to genetic issues. While it seems counter productive to do exercises when you are fatigued by the hormone therapy. It actually works just the opposite and gives you more energy.

Just some things to think about and talk to your doctor about.

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@kingsiang
I got prostate cancer at 62 and had surgery, That was followed by radiation 3 1/2 years later. I have a genetic problem that causes my cancer to keep coming back, so that was probably the best choice.

My brother got prostate cancer at 77, He was on active surveillance for six years before. He had a Gleason 4+3 and had 5 sessions of SBRT radiation. Three years later, his PSA has stayed stable. There is Usually no need at that age to do IMRT radiation. SBRT is just as effective and actually kills the cancer cells more aggressively. They usually don’t like to do surgery on somebody that’s 76, The long-term results are just as good with radiation.

You may need to find another center of excellence so that you can Have the option of SBRT radiation. You should talk to your radiation oncologist about this.

Yes, they do usually want you on hormone therapy (ADT) after radiation, for a Gleason eight they recommend 18 months. In some cases that may not work well. It can affect your blood sugar And cholesterol. The drugs I have taken for prostate cancer gave me high blood pressure, but I take three pills twice a day and they keep my blood pressure quite under control. You can control these problems by eating carefully, Watching how much sugar and cholesterol are in food you eat. I have very low cholesterol and a very normal blood sugar But I’m very careful about what I eat.

I am 78 and run 1 mile twice a day every day. I also go to the gym three days a week to do weight training. If you go on hormone therapy, you really need to exercise and do weight training or your muscles will deteriorate and you will frequently have fatigue. I’ve been on hormone therapy for eight years because my cancer keeps coming back due to genetic issues. While it seems counter productive to do exercises when you are fatigued by the hormone therapy. It actually works just the opposite and gives you more energy.

Just some things to think about and talk to your doctor about.

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc thank you for sharing. Did any of your urology doctor advised to do Surgery to remove the prostate ? From your story, you just doing hormone therapy, without doing any radio ?

REPLY
Profile picture for kingsiang @kingsiang

@jeffmarc thank you for sharing. Did any of your urology doctor advised to do Surgery to remove the prostate ? From your story, you just doing hormone therapy, without doing any radio ?

Jump to this post

@kingsiang
It was quite specific in the message I wrote. I had a prostatectomy 16 years ago and 3 1/2 years later my PSA started rising so I had salvage radiation. 2..5 years after that, my PSA started rising again, and I went on Casodex for a little over a year and then Lupron for six years.

That was in the first sentence I wrote above.

I was given the choice of surgery or radiation. My father died of prostate cancer and he had radiation so I decided to have surgery Because if it came back, I could have radiation.

REPLY

I had a prostatectomy in 2018. Went on radiation 35 treatments and testosterone blocker for one year. PSA low until this year when it rose to 5.1 from 2.9 over 7months. Now back on eligart for 6months. If this does not work is orchi the best answer. I am 79 and very physically active - core exercises, resistance training and sprinting.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.