Metabolic therapy for cancer
I have several posts here about my newly-diagnosed metastatic melanoma, but I wanted this to be a new thread.
I was looking for alternative therapies for cancer, and I was afraid that most of them would seem, well, a little kooky (sorry, but that's what I thought).
I found one, however, that seems to be both outside the mainstream standard-of-care, but yet very well represented in the scientific literature, including at least one Nobel Prize (Warburg), and that is the metabolic theory of cancer. It seems as though its primary promoter is Dr Thomas Seyfried of Boston College. He is a professor of biology, genetics, and biochemistry at Boston College.
He has many books, articles, and videos online, so it is easy to learn about this theory.
I cannot go into it in detail, but its premise is that cancer is a metabolic disease, and not a genetic one. Please take the time to look at the details before shooting me. š
My only question here is whether anyone else has looked into this, and what do you make of it? Did you ever ask your oncologist about it?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Cancer Support Group.
@mddrm, you've articulated your wife's journey concisely and clearly. I appreciate the backgrounder.
Diet, exercise, and healthy living have been proven to reduce the risk of cancer as well as reduce the risk of it returning elsewhere in the body (metastasis). But lifestyle choices or diet regimens are not a prevention guarantee. I wish they were. It is a gut punch when one does all the "right" things and cancer returns anyway. This gets into a dangerous mindset of blaming oneself or having others accuse the patient that they didn't do enough. It can also give birth to charletans who claim to have the curative diet or supplement, etc, making unfounded promises. Not that you or wife are doing that. Sometimes people do.
It's obvious that your and your wife's approach with low-carb, healthy fat and ketogenic diet along with intermittent fasting helped reverse her diabetes and no doubt improved her health. Perhaps it even delayed the return of cancer. Will we ever know? Like you, I choose to believe her dietary discipline gives her a leg up for the journey ahead.
Like your wife, my father choose not to have chemo when his colorectal cancer returned. Our family supported that choice. We were granted twice as long with him than was predicted. Towards the end, diet consisted of anything he wanted š
I strongly encourage you to look into palliative care as well as integrative oncology. I see that Virginia Oncology has recently added integrative cancer to there practice https://blog.virginiacancer.com/integrative-medicine-coming-to-virginia-oncology-associates
Is your wife currently a Mayo Clinic patient?
@bmb, there is a cancer education library at the Phoenix/Scottsdale campus too. All Mayo Clinic locations offer integrative practices:
- Integrative Medicine and Health at Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/departments-centers/integrative-medicine-health/sections/overview/ovc-20464567
In AZ https://www.mayoclinic.org/departments-centers/integrative-medicine-and-health-services-in-arizona/sections/overview/ovc-20529683
@colleenyoung : Thanks for the response and absolutely, we are charlatan-wary, understanding that any treatment is ultimately palliative. We're not looking for a cure. But, I have to say that charlatantry can be found just as much within the medical-industrial complex as without. While never saying "This treatment will cure you," (for fear of lawsuits!) the pitch is placed in either glossy terms or alternately in subtle scare-tactic fashion, such as, "If you *don't* do the chemo you won't live as long," all the while downplaying the side effects, quality-of-life issues, and the possibility that the treatment itself could be the thing which kills you! It's like all those drug commercials with happy people in soft focus, while the narrator rattles off the fine print.
āLife is pain, highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.ā William Goldman, The Princess Bride
I believe your father chose wisely!
No, my wife is not a Mayo patient, and Virginia Oncology has no nearby locations to us. Traveling great distances for treatment is not an option, as I indicated. I also note that the "integrative medicine" there is meant to deal with side effects only while still practicing the standard slash, burn, and poison approach. This seems to me to be wholly different from the research being pursued by folks such as Dr. Seyfried.
And one needs to be careful as well with painting someone as a charlatan if the *only* reason for doing so is because they consider the possibility that the medical-industrial complex might just have it all wrong. No, I am not at all suggesting *you* are doing this! I'm just pointing out that it's oftentimes the outside-the-box thinkers who make the greatest discoveries.
So, all of that to say, yes, we deem the approach we are taking as palliative in nature, and because of my wife's character, discipline, and diet, she may very well be one of those statistical dots down in the far lower right of the survival curve. Or, she may not, but she's good with that.
Why do I need a Doc to monitor me on a low carb diet? Carbs nor fiber are necessary for human health.
Why do you feel that way? Is it because people can't manage to go into ketosis for 2 weeks to save their life? That is all Seyfried's protocol requires.
I have been eating less than 10 carbs/day for almost a year now and have beaten 2 cancers, 1 was a melanoma, and lost 72lbs.
I am convinced cancer is 90% metabolic and food and environmental factors are responsible for almost all cancer.
What have you got to lose? We have been "at war" with cancer since Nixon in 1971 and have made almost no progress in 53 years of being "At war" with it. The only significant drop in cancer rates have been from smoking cessation.
What Seyfried says makes complete sense. What the rest of the establishment says makes none.
If you read why medicine actually started using radiation as a treatment it will horrify you. Plus oncologists make 65% of their revenue from prescribing chemo. Chew on that for a minute.
I agree with you, especially about the "cancer industry", e.g. see Mark Sloan's book of the same title.
Thomas Seyfried and his colleague's are writing the treatment protocols for Press-Pulse now. I'm sure the big Pharma own USDA will drag their feet as long as possible on approval.
this is it. this guy has put his finger on it, syphoned it down to understandable language. it's the glucose and glutamine that kill you. the cancer thrives on both so take them out of the equation. 1) no sugar or carbs, ketosis. 2) break down the glutamine either with berberine, or remove the precursors cysteine and methionine, and voila, you win. I think there is a class action suit in all of this. doctors take an oath "first not to do harm" and yet they are doing it every day with radiation and chemo. they know how to cure you but they don't tell you how. they are literally killing hundreds of thousands of people. 4 months ago I was diagnosed with stage IIb cervical and sent to die. it took awhile to figure it out but now I am working with a Gerson practitioner and following Seyfried's protocol. I'll get back to you in 10 years. it takes discipline and a positive attitude but it's all right there in front of us.
I am sold on limiting carbs as an approach to warding off cancer if you are healthy or in remission. I have yet to be fully convinced of it as a means of treating or managing cancer. . However, it would be an enormous breakthrough if the latter is shown to be possible.
What absolutely needs to happen is for every person in the cancer survivor follow up period to receive much better advice on diet, weight management and exercise to remain healthy. My family member asked about this after her first occurrence and was told she could eat anything. The second time was given diet advice and encouraged to lose weight but still only as a recommendation, with no emphasis on how important this would be. Only, due to our personal interest and the availability of excellent research have we as a family focused on our diet as diligently as we do now.
I would not wish to advise anyone dealing with cancer as to which treatment direction they should take. But, I would actively encourage everyone on this site to examine their diets and as quickly as possible move away from the Standard American Diet towards healthier eating habits.
Best health to all.
Since Iām on my 3rd round of cancer and have developed chemo resistanceā¦..I was in a desperate position to find any complimentary therapies that may help in combating chemo resistance by weakening the cancer cells through metabolic means. Iāve looked into a lot of Dr. Thomas Seyfrieds work. Iāve also read an interesting book by Jane McLeland, and looked up some related videos on YouTube. I am using the info I gathered in conjunction with the standard chemotherapy regimens. I mentioned to my oncologist what Iām doing and he neither approved nor disapproved. I think our oncologists may be limited by the standards of practice. I joke to my loved ones that I am currently the most poorly designed science experiment ever, with so many of the things Iām doing (variables). Medical Science likes double blind studies. They are the gold standard. For some of usā¦. These types of studies are near impossible. With this, I feel that much of the research is retrospective or longitudinal and often gets discredited by the medical community. So ultimatelyā¦. It is those of us that are at a point where we have nothing to lose that dive full heartedly into alternative therapies.