Can anyone share their experience with Pluvicto?
My 85 year old dad has prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones. Zytiga is no longer effective. He is considering Pluvicto. I would appreciate input from those who have used Pluvicto.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Yes, I completely agree. Since I received the treatment initially as a clinical trial, no insurance was involved. This go around, Medicare and my supplemental insurer view it as their first time and are covering the costs. Good luck, it certainly prolonged my life.
Hi @williamsmichco, I'm tagging @lag so she can share her caregiving experiences as her husband had pluvicto treatment.
How is your dad doing? How are you doing?
I am sorry for my delayed reply--I didn't see this post by Colleen. Every man reacts differently to Pluvicto--please don't assume your dad will have as hard a time as the person whose post has concerned you. My husband has now had all six Pluvicto infusions, and I can say that his side effects were mild throughout the treatments. He did have some constipation initially, but it was easily dealt with using Miralax, and his mouth and eyes were dry for a few days after each infusion. The biggest problem is that his appetite changed--he wasn't interested in food, and things didn't taste great. But this was nothing like the effects of chemo on eating, and we have adjusted what foods we have on hand for him. Take care of yourself while you care for him, and don't assume the worst will happen. Also ask your nuclear medicine or oncology team for advice on dealing with any side effects that do bother him. Hang in there. I am sending a hug and good wishes to you both. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions as things progress.
Can you tell me where you were treated.
Hi, I was just declined by Mayo of Scottsdale for Pluvicto without chemo. Where were you treated please ? and who was your oncologist?
I am in Tennessee. I am treated through the Erlanger hospital and Tennessee Oncology, both in Chattanooga. My oncologist is Dr. Robert Graham.
I know I had to lobby for Pluvicto without chemotherapy for many months. I saw it and wanted it but everyone was under rubric it still being experimental, not generally available, still in clinical trials, etc. As I recall, the lighamb was broken by the manufacturer who apparently could wring no more out being at that stage and saw no reason to keep maintaining the clinical trials operating conditions and was ready to expand its use further. The usual cycle of something being brand new, unproven, experimental, etc gradually working its was into broader acceptance.
Everyone is different so you need a good oncologist that you are confident in to advise you. My theory is it's my body, my health, therefore my call. I will take all the professional advice I can, but the final decision is mine I came through the six six week rounds of Pluvicto treatments with flying colors. Not everyone does so. It's up to you to treat your illness as aggressively or conservatively as you are comfortable with.
I don't know why you were declined Pluvicto treatments. Perhaps the state of advancement of the cancer may have something to do with it. Mine started out at Stage IV prostate cancer and rapidly metastasized through my bones. If you are looking for a second oncology diagnosis and read on the details of your personal situation, from my own personal experience I highly recommend Dr Robert Graham at Tennessee Oncology in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
What was your response to Pluvicto? What was your PSA at the start of treatment? Did you get back to undetectable? Did the bone metastases shrink or resolve? Anything you are willing to share would be most helpful.
I know you asked redroadtraveler, but I thought I would answer your questions by saying what my husband's recent experience with Pluvicto was. As he said, every man's experience is different, so keep that in mind as different people answer you. My husband had Pluvicto treatment at Mayo Rochester from January 2024 through August 2024. In September 2024 he had a Choline C-11 PET scan and lab work to determine how successful the treatment had been. (Dr. Kwon's protocol is to get a PSMA PET scan near the end of Pluvicto treatment and then a C-11 PET scan after treatment has concluded, because the scans look for different types of cancer cells.) The September C-11 PET showed the targeted metastases to be faded and likely destroyed by the Pluvicto, and also showed no new Choline-avid metastases. This was good news. However, my husband was disappointed that his PSA did not become undetectable as a result of the Pluvicto infusions. The nuclear medicine and urology teams both said he nonetheless had a very positive result of the treatment. The Kwon team has scheduled him for a PSMA PET and abdominal/pelvic MRI on January 6 to see if any new metastases have appeared by then as a result of cancer hiding in his body. As they always say, "we can't treat what we can't see." Keep in mind that other men who post here about their Pluvicto experiences may have had better or less good outcomes. There are no guarantees, but it is now standard of care for some men who are Stage 4 and have progressed on other treatments.
My experience was fairly similar to Lags husband.
Went through all six treatments, then got a psma pet scan to check on results.
A couple of years ago I had a five session targeted radiation treatment. The psma pet scan showed one new cancerous spot coming just off the edge of one of the previous targeted radiation treatment spots (not related to the Pluvicto treatment).
Other then that, the psma pet scan showed the larger cancerous areas diminished by about half, the smaller areas of cancer gone, and no other new growth areas.
I am currently undergoing another series of five targeted radiation treatments for the one area which has appeared just off the old area that was previously treated with targeted radiation.
As far as PSA is concerned I have had eligard shots to keep my testosterone low. The theory is low testosterone results in low cancer growth, but I not found that to be true. All the eligard seems to do for me is keep my testosterone down. I see no effect one way or the other on my cancer. My testosterone is currently high, in the seventies, but I don't take that as a reliable market of imminent cancer doom.
I will have to see how I am in a few weeks after my current series of five targeted radiation treatments have run their course and settled in to determine what comes next. I know others who have successfully handled the Pluvicto treatment have now started on a second set of six rounds of Pluvicto. I am very open to going that route, but also want to see what, if anything else, allopathic medicine may have to offer.
Ii is my understanding that Medicare covers only 6 rounds of Pluvicto. I am just curious..is there private insurance that covers more?