Can anyone share their experience with Pluvicto?

Posted by vcash @vcash, Apr 22 8:35pm

My 85 year old dad has prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones. Zytiga is no longer effective. He is considering Pluvicto. I would appreciate input from those who have used Pluvicto.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@redroadtraveler

Yes.

I have now completed my six rounds of Pluvicto. More Pluvicto treatments beyond six rounds puts us right back into unknown, experimental territory.

Pluvicto seems to be the current "final frontier" of treatments available from the allopathic world. As far as I know, once we have completed the initial six rounds that's the end of any FDA approved treatments. We are on our own at that point. My experience with Pluvicto has been very good. All the oncologist can offer at this point is simply continuing to monitor my condition.

If it begins to get significantly worse I will be lobbying for me to jump into the experimental world of additional Pluvicto treatments.

I wish you good luck with your additional Pluvicto treatments.

Jump to this post

Yes, I completely agree. Since I received the treatment initially as a clinical trial, no insurance was involved. This go around, Medicare and my supplemental insurer view it as their first time and are covering the costs. Good luck, it certainly prolonged my life.

REPLY
@williamsmichco

My dad - 80 yr old just started pluvicto. He has had one treatment, next one is in October.
You mention treatment gets rougher, may I ask what we can expect?
Also- did your psa go up anytime after treatment? His is up from 100 to 400.
Worried daughter - I appreciate anything information you are willing to share.

Jump to this post

Hi @williamsmichco, I'm tagging @lag so she can share her caregiving experiences as her husband had pluvicto treatment.

How is your dad doing? How are you doing?

REPLY
@williamsmichco

My dad - 80 yr old just started pluvicto. He has had one treatment, next one is in October.
You mention treatment gets rougher, may I ask what we can expect?
Also- did your psa go up anytime after treatment? His is up from 100 to 400.
Worried daughter - I appreciate anything information you are willing to share.

Jump to this post

I am sorry for my delayed reply--I didn't see this post by Colleen. Every man reacts differently to Pluvicto--please don't assume your dad will have as hard a time as the person whose post has concerned you. My husband has now had all six Pluvicto infusions, and I can say that his side effects were mild throughout the treatments. He did have some constipation initially, but it was easily dealt with using Miralax, and his mouth and eyes were dry for a few days after each infusion. The biggest problem is that his appetite changed--he wasn't interested in food, and things didn't taste great. But this was nothing like the effects of chemo on eating, and we have adjusted what foods we have on hand for him. Take care of yourself while you care for him, and don't assume the worst will happen. Also ask your nuclear medicine or oncology team for advice on dealing with any side effects that do bother him. Hang in there. I am sending a hug and good wishes to you both. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions as things progress.

REPLY
@redroadtraveler

I am 80 years old with stage IV prostate cancer which has metasasized throughout my bones. Been on various immunotherapy treatments for 3-4 years (most recent being Keytruda). All of them have run their course and are no longer effective.

I tried for several months to get the Pluvicto treatment but they didn't do it due to the FDA saying a person had to have had chemotherapy first. I elected to NOT have chemotherapy as it made no sense to me to kill off everything and hope that the good comes back faster than the bad.

Very recently, the manufacturer began to question the necessity for chemotherapy prior to Pluvicto and I am one of the first people to get Pluvicto without having had chemotherapy.

Pluvicto treatment protocol is an IV injection every six weeks for a total of six times. It is a heavy duty radiation treatment but it is NOT chemotherapy. It targets the cancer cells instead of the shotgun approach of chemotherapy.

I am halfway through my Pluvicto treatment. I have had three injections and will get number four in a week.

You will get detailed scans prior to the treatment, and the doctor will monitor your blood work closely and see how you are tolerating treatment before giving you the next injection.

After the injection, they turn you loose when your radiation level is three at a distance of three feet.

We joke that I "glow in the dark" after the injection but there is a certain amount of truth in that. I wanted this treatment for myself, but was concerned about "collateral damage" of radiation to anyone else around me. The official guidelines tell you to maintain a three foot distance from everyone for three days, and for seven days from pregnant women and small children (and by extension small animals like cats or dogs).

Every radioactive substance has a half-life and decays over time. I purchased a dosimeter (Geiger counter) from Amazon for about $100 to monitor my actual condition rather than simply going by their guidelines.

My personal experience is that, for me, the guidelines are not strict enough. I do not want to cause collateral radiation damage to anyone else, so monitor my radiation level daily at three feet, one and a half feet, and right next to my skin.

My personal protocol is to isolate myself for one week. I am alone in the bedroom, reading, binge watching Netflix, etc., leaving only briefly to get something to eat or go to the bathroom.

During week two I loosen up a bit, allowing brief contact such as a hug or a handshake, but no prolonged contact.

By the end of two weeks from my injection, my personal radiation level is down to zero at my skin, so I no longer have any danger of giving collateral radiation damage to anyone. At that point I resume sleeping in the same bed with my wife and have no issues with personal contact with others.

Everyone reacts differently to different treatments. I have tolerated it reasonably well. The worst side effect has been serious constipation. Also a moderate increase in fatigue.

I would like to get another scan now, halfway through treatment, but insurance won't pay for it. I will get another scan when all treatments are done so I will at least have a before and after reading on how effective (or ineffective) it has been.

Jump to this post

Can you tell me where you were treated.

REPLY
@redroadtraveler

Hello Colleen,

I must have stirred up the hornets nest with the Mayo administration with my comments about my experience with Pluvicto, Let me say that I think everyone is entitled to make their own decisions regarding their heath care. If a person chooses to turn over all responsibility to the allopathic doctors and do everything and anything they tell you without question that is their right and prerogative.

I am not one of those people.

I have had Stage IV prostate cancer for several years which has metastasized throughout my bones. I have an excellent oncologist. It is a team effort, but I reserve the final right to accept or decline what he has to offer. So far I have accepted everything he said except one - chemotherapy. I declined chemotherapy because it made no sense to me to kill off the good and the bad and hope that the good comes back faster than the bad. I have been through many different treatments. Each of them worked for a while, then ran their course and became relatively ineffective, the last one being Keytruda.

Then along came a new cutting edge treatment called Pluvicto. When I found out about it I was totally in favor of it because, unlike chemotherapy, it targeted the cancer cells and didn't go after the non-cancerous cells. I lobbied my Oncologist for several months to get this treatment but treatment was denied because (at that time) the FDA was requiring a person to have had chemotherapy in order to qualify. That requirement was recently dropped so I finally got the treatment I was seeking.

I got a dosimeter to monitor my radiation levels because I was very concerned about my "glow in the dark" status possibly causing what I call "collateral damage" to caregivers, family, and friends. When I get my Pluvicto injection they keep me in the hospital fifteen to thirty minutes afterwards to monitor me to make sure I am not having any adverse effects and to check my radiation reading. I am turned loose when the radiation reading at three feet is around 3 millirems per hour.

Colleen, I certainly appreciate your obligation to reiterate the current protocol as all that is needed, but my personal experience has led me to a different conclusion.

Current protocol says to isolate yourself for three days and not allow anyone closer than three feet (seven days for small children and pregnant women), and advises you to sleep in a separate room for that three days. The object of course being to limit any collateral damage to others. But we are told that after this three day period we can begin to resume what passes for a "normal" life when you are fighting cancer. You can stop isolating yourself. You can sleep with your spouse. The time for collateral damage has passed.

My personal protocol is to isolate myself for one week, then allow limited contact for the second week - being with a few people is ok, brief hugs or handshakes are ok, but no extended contact and no sleeping with my wife yet.

Let me explain how I came to that conclusion.

I am now five days from my last Pluvicto infusion, not three. My current radiation readings at day five are 0.8 at arms length (about three feet), 2.0 at a one foot distance, and 3.8 at my body. The effect of radiation exposure is cumulative in the body to anyone exposed to my radiation. The radiation does not REMAIN in their body but the effects of the exposure lingers. Annual cumulative exposure that is supposedly safe is 100 millirems for a person in the general public.

The official protocol says to isolate yourself for three days, but you are good to go after that. You can resume sleeping with your spouse. You can sit on the couch and watch a Netflix movie together for two hours.

Let's examine that in detail.

If my spouse and I sit at opposite ends of the couch for two hours watching a Netflix movie five days after my Pluvicto treatment she receives 2 x .8 = 1.6 millirems of radiation exposure. That's OK. If we were to sit a foot apart, not touching, she would receive 2 x 2.0 = 4 millirems of radiation exposure. Not good, as we are advised to not let anyone get more than 3 millirems a day. If we were to sit next to each other, touching and snuggling and cuddling she would receive 2 x 3.5 = 7 millirems of radiation exposure. Not good at all.

And it gets much worse when we examine sleeping in the same bed together for, say, eight hours a night. If we each cling to our respective side of the bed to keep from falling out we are about three feet apart. In that case she would be exposed to 8 x .8 = 6.4 millirems of radiation. Not good. If we were a foot apart but not touching she would receive 8 x 2.0 = 16 millirems of radiation exposure. If we were actually touching it would be 8 x 3.8 = 30.4 millirems or almost one third of the safe annual accumulated radiation exposure. Not good at all.

We are told that distance and time are "our friends" in this adventure. The further away a person is from the Pluvicto patient the less exposure. That is our "distance" friend. Every day that goes by the half life process continues and the radiation levels decrease. That is our "time" friend.

Colleen, I very much look forward to your reply and if my analysis as above is in any way mistaken I want you to correct my errors, for my understanding and the understanding of all Pluvicto patients who are following this thread.

Robert

Jump to this post

Hi, I was just declined by Mayo of Scottsdale for Pluvicto without chemo. Where were you treated please ? and who was your oncologist?

REPLY

I am in Tennessee. I am treated through the Erlanger hospital and Tennessee Oncology, both in Chattanooga. My oncologist is Dr. Robert Graham.

I know I had to lobby for Pluvicto without chemotherapy for many months. I saw it and wanted it but everyone was under rubric it still being experimental, not generally available, still in clinical trials, etc. As I recall, the lighamb was broken by the manufacturer who apparently could wring no more out being at that stage and saw no reason to keep maintaining the clinical trials operating conditions and was ready to expand its use further. The usual cycle of something being brand new, unproven, experimental, etc gradually working its was into broader acceptance.

Everyone is different so you need a good oncologist that you are confident in to advise you. My theory is it's my body, my health, therefore my call. I will take all the professional advice I can, but the final decision is mine I came through the six six week rounds of Pluvicto treatments with flying colors. Not everyone does so. It's up to you to treat your illness as aggressively or conservatively as you are comfortable with.

I don't know why you were declined Pluvicto treatments. Perhaps the state of advancement of the cancer may have something to do with it. Mine started out at Stage IV prostate cancer and rapidly metastasized through my bones. If you are looking for a second oncology diagnosis and read on the details of your personal situation, from my own personal experience I highly recommend Dr Robert Graham at Tennessee Oncology in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

REPLY

What was your response to Pluvicto? What was your PSA at the start of treatment? Did you get back to undetectable? Did the bone metastases shrink or resolve? Anything you are willing to share would be most helpful.

REPLY
@wooldridgec

What was your response to Pluvicto? What was your PSA at the start of treatment? Did you get back to undetectable? Did the bone metastases shrink or resolve? Anything you are willing to share would be most helpful.

Jump to this post

I know you asked redroadtraveler, but I thought I would answer your questions by saying what my husband's recent experience with Pluvicto was. As he said, every man's experience is different, so keep that in mind as different people answer you. My husband had Pluvicto treatment at Mayo Rochester from January 2024 through August 2024. In September 2024 he had a Choline C-11 PET scan and lab work to determine how successful the treatment had been. (Dr. Kwon's protocol is to get a PSMA PET scan near the end of Pluvicto treatment and then a C-11 PET scan after treatment has concluded, because the scans look for different types of cancer cells.) The September C-11 PET showed the targeted metastases to be faded and likely destroyed by the Pluvicto, and also showed no new Choline-avid metastases. This was good news. However, my husband was disappointed that his PSA did not become undetectable as a result of the Pluvicto infusions. The nuclear medicine and urology teams both said he nonetheless had a very positive result of the treatment. The Kwon team has scheduled him for a PSMA PET and abdominal/pelvic MRI on January 6 to see if any new metastases have appeared by then as a result of cancer hiding in his body. As they always say, "we can't treat what we can't see." Keep in mind that other men who post here about their Pluvicto experiences may have had better or less good outcomes. There are no guarantees, but it is now standard of care for some men who are Stage 4 and have progressed on other treatments.

REPLY

My experience was fairly similar to Lags husband.

Went through all six treatments, then got a psma pet scan to check on results.

A couple of years ago I had a five session targeted radiation treatment. The psma pet scan showed one new cancerous spot coming just off the edge of one of the previous targeted radiation treatment spots (not related to the Pluvicto treatment).

Other then that, the psma pet scan showed the larger cancerous areas diminished by about half, the smaller areas of cancer gone, and no other new growth areas.

I am currently undergoing another series of five targeted radiation treatments for the one area which has appeared just off the old area that was previously treated with targeted radiation.

As far as PSA is concerned I have had eligard shots to keep my testosterone low. The theory is low testosterone results in low cancer growth, but I not found that to be true. All the eligard seems to do for me is keep my testosterone down. I see no effect one way or the other on my cancer. My testosterone is currently high, in the seventies, but I don't take that as a reliable market of imminent cancer doom.

I will have to see how I am in a few weeks after my current series of five targeted radiation treatments have run their course and settled in to determine what comes next. I know others who have successfully handled the Pluvicto treatment have now started on a second set of six rounds of Pluvicto. I am very open to going that route, but also want to see what, if anything else, allopathic medicine may have to offer.

REPLY
@redroadtraveler

My experience was fairly similar to Lags husband.

Went through all six treatments, then got a psma pet scan to check on results.

A couple of years ago I had a five session targeted radiation treatment. The psma pet scan showed one new cancerous spot coming just off the edge of one of the previous targeted radiation treatment spots (not related to the Pluvicto treatment).

Other then that, the psma pet scan showed the larger cancerous areas diminished by about half, the smaller areas of cancer gone, and no other new growth areas.

I am currently undergoing another series of five targeted radiation treatments for the one area which has appeared just off the old area that was previously treated with targeted radiation.

As far as PSA is concerned I have had eligard shots to keep my testosterone low. The theory is low testosterone results in low cancer growth, but I not found that to be true. All the eligard seems to do for me is keep my testosterone down. I see no effect one way or the other on my cancer. My testosterone is currently high, in the seventies, but I don't take that as a reliable market of imminent cancer doom.

I will have to see how I am in a few weeks after my current series of five targeted radiation treatments have run their course and settled in to determine what comes next. I know others who have successfully handled the Pluvicto treatment have now started on a second set of six rounds of Pluvicto. I am very open to going that route, but also want to see what, if anything else, allopathic medicine may have to offer.

Jump to this post

Ii is my understanding that Medicare covers only 6 rounds of Pluvicto. I am just curious..is there private insurance that covers more?

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.