Interesting response. First comes the claim based on the swine flu vaccine (48 years ago) that "you think every modern vaccine is safe and effective". I never said any such thing about modern vaccines being safe and effective. And then I am told what I should read. I assume this is to enlighten me. I suggest maybe quoting from the book itself and also include the authors perspective rather than just telling me to read it.
Then comes discussion that in the future the shingles vaccine may be using mRNA technology. I do not know why that was included. Maybe proof that I was wrong when I said mRNA is not used is almost all vaccines.
Additionally and I quote "Nowhere have I posted that the COVID vaccine causes AFIB."
I never said that you posted anything about Covid vaccines causing Afib". So my response to that is "HUH?"
Finally I am accused of "being an angry man" and telling me to "chill".
The claims presented about me are both materially false and then get personal telling me what to read (that book), claiming that I am angry man and I need to chill.
I find this most inappropriate. This distracts and distorts my original response re: mRNA technology is not found in most vaccines. That it maybe used in future vaccines is immaterial.
I would appreciate it that you stop making misleading statements about me, calling me angry and telling me to chill.
This is gone beyond the pale.