Support For Those Quitting Prolia

Posted by formisc @formisc, Feb 13 10:14pm

I wanted to start this Discussion as a support thread for those who have already decided to quit Prolia and are in the process of transitioning out of Prolia to share our knowledge, thoughts, decisions and experiences as i had difficulty finding such posts from the various other Prolia threads. Those who have already completed their transition from Prolia are most welcome to contribute their experience.

It would help if you could include some basic info such as TScores, BTMs if available, number of Prolia injections taken, what med you transitioned to, length of time on relay drug and any feedback on effectiveness/reaction to the relay drug.

To prevent overlap with other Discussions already on this forum, the reasons for quitting Prolia need not be raised and it will be assumed that you have already done your research and made your decision. It is hoped that this Discussion will focus more on any feedback/advice that can assist in the transitioning process i.e. not on the 'Why' (quit Prolia) but more on the 'How' (to manage the transition).

Maybe i can start.

Background:
My TScores from my 1st DXA scan in May 2022 were:
Lumbar Spine -1.3
Femoral Neck -2.7
Total Hip -3.0
Unfortunately, my PCP did not order any BTMs so i do not have any baseline numbers.

My 1st Prolia shot was in July 2022, 2nd in Jan 2023 and my 3rd in July 2023.

In Dec 2023 after 18 months on Prolia, i did my 2nd DXA and the results were:
Lumbar Spine -1.1
Femoral Neck -2.6

I decided to quit Prolia before the 4th shot and started on weekly Alendronate in Jan 2024. To date, i have taken 7 Alendronate tablets.

Feedback on Alendronate:
The relay drugs most often cited are Reclast (most frequent) and Alendronate. Alendronate is not recommended for those with esophagus issues as it can irritate and damage the digestive tract.

I decided on Alendronate instead of Reclast as i was wary of taking in a full 1 year's dose of meds in one go and also because i read that the timing of the Reclast infusion can be tricky and the wrong timing may necessitate additional infusions. With Alendronate being a smaller weekly dose, the timing is not really an issue provided there is no delay in starting it at the time the Prolia shot is due.

The 2 days after the first Alendronate tablet and also after the 3rd tablet, i had a bit of stomach pain which went away after i took Veragel. From the 4th week to the 7th week, i have had an achy feeling at the side of my left knee. More surprisingly, i had 3 episodes of tinnitus after my 6th tablet, something which i have not experienced for a long time.

All the above side-effects have been bearable so i will continue with the Alendronate. I pray for the side-effects to cease as i do not want to go on Reclast and i read that Actonel is not potent enough to mitigate the rebound effect.

I plan to do a BTM test in Mar 2024 and quarterly thereafter for the 1st year and a DXA at the end of the 1st year. Depending on the results, i may stop the Alendronate or perhaps go on half-dosage for another 6 months instead of stopping cold turkey. Will also do a BTM at 18 months and a BTM cum DXA at 24 months of Alendronate as the rebound window supposedly stretches over 30 months from the last Prolia shot.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.

@rjd

Thank you for sharing your knowledge on this matter. I still struggle with understanding conceptually the osteoclast/osteoblast connection.

Especially good to know that the CTX may continue to decrease with further Fosomax use. But it would be nice to know what the CTX target might be.

I would like to stop the Fosamax ASAP. Ever since I learned that a problem with this medication is that it interferes with the removal of old bone so that new bone may be forming on a foundation of old bone rather than on a cleaned up base (or not even new bone forming at all) I have wanted to say good-by to Fosamax.

How long do you think you have to be off Fosamax in order to reset if future treatment with an anabolic is warranted????????

Best of luck with your own osteo progress and thank you. You certainly have helped many of us on Connect.

Jump to this post

Thank you, rjd but i think you may have given me too much credit! I don't have any medical background and whatever i know comes from articles that i have read, most of which i have linked to in my earlier posts. Hence, whatever i write here should be treated as merely my opinion

Like you, i wish to ease off Prolia the earliest possible and am relying on BTM tests to guide me. It is interesting that you asked about the length of time needed for "reset" because, if you go to my profile you will find that my very first post and the first discussion i started was titled "How Long For Body To Reset?" ! You may want to read the responses in that thread, in particular from gently, although i think there was no definitive answer

All the best

REPLY

I have received the results of my BTM blood test done on 25 May 2024 after 22 weeks of Alendronate following cessation of Prolia:

CTX < 50 pg/mL (no figure given)(previous 51)(range 171-970)
iPTH 3.2 pmol/L (prev 3.5)(range 1.6-6.9)
Calcium (corrected) 8.7 mg/dL (prev 8.3)(range 8.8-10.2)
Albumin 4.1 g/dL (prev 4.1)(range 3.5-5.0)
Vit D 43.3 ng/mL (prev 42)(range 30.0-99.9

Just to recap - I did 3 half-yearly Prolia injections in Jul 2022, Jan 2023 and July 2023 and started on Alendronate at end-Dec 2023. My first BTM was in early Mar 2024 after 10 weeks of Alendronate. I do not have any baseline BTM numbers. Am sharing my BTM results in case it proves useful to anyone else monitoring their own exit from Prolia

Apart from rjd who has shared his BTM numbers in his post above, it would be great if anyone else quitting Prolia can also share their numbers so that we can have some comparison although I am not sure how relevant/useful that would be

Regarding my own results, I am a bit surprised that my CTX has continued to drop although, without an actual number (not sure why), I don't know the extent of the drop. Not sure if the very low CTX is any cause for concern but at the very least it should indicate that the rebound effect is currently under control. I guess it would have been more concerning if CTX had shot up to a high number like 600-800 which would indicate a rebound effect happening - thankfully, that didn't happen

Calcium has improved because I increased my daily intake from 500-600mg to 800-900mg. Vit D increased only slightly eventhough I increased my daily dose from 1,000 IU to 2,000 IU

Would appreciate any comments on my latest BTM results - in particular, the low/lower CTX.

Does the continued low CTX mean that the Alendronate is effective and I should start considering reducing the dosage/frequency?

REPLY

You asked a question about whether there should be concern about your low CTX scores. The only responses to your initial query that I saw were: 1) low CTX is good and 2) others posting CTX results similar to yours.

I am going to play devil's advocate here. It seems to me that it is possible that CTX can be too low. First, I note several posts indicating that dental work is not recommended with CTX lower than 150. Second, I considered the established reference range of about 171-970...seems to me there ought to be a reason why the reference range low is about 170. Perhaps, we are just perplexed about what that reason might be (in addition to the dental issue.)

Third, I reviewed relevant sections of McCormick's Great Bones....and that produced a bonanza of info. McCormick prefers a different CTX relevant range for post-menopausal women (his suggested range is 100-375). He does not want to see anything below 100 because....

"....bone needs to have osteoclastic bone resorption. If resorption activity gets too low, it can lead to adynamic, or low-turnover, fragile bone, which will increase fracture risk and predisposed a patient to osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures." (P. 148.)

McCormick's take on a too low CTX score comports with my new conceptual understanding of the dynamics of bone remodeling (see below.)

He further strongly urges a testing protocol for CTX of having blood drawn a) as early in the day as possible;b) after a night of strict fasting (he says CTX can go down 20% without fasting) and c) to stop taking any biotin and collagen supps for 48 hours.

I assume you followed this protocol?

I have admittedly had trouble conceptually with what is often described as a 'dynamic process' of bone breakdown and bone creation. This process is often referenced as 'bone remodeling.' But I still search for better info about what the balance or the relationship between these 2 processes might be.

I recently viewed a video posted in one of the Connect threads. https://youtu.be/Cd0YT-OV97c?si=FHXCpupgt1A5AaQP. It really helped me understand some things.

As a result, I now see bone remodeling as similar to painting. (Chuckling is allowed.)

Everyone knows that when something needs to be painted, you just do not slap a coat of paint on top of the old paint and call it a day. Rather, you want to prepare the surface for a new coat of paint. For example, removing peeling paint and certainly doing some sanding. Proper prep work makes the difference for the application of a new coat of paint that will last.

Likewise bone formation needs proper prep of the existing bone via the resorption activity of osteoclastic cells.

Now that you are finished chuckling about my painting analogy, would appreciate any thoughts about anyone seeing flaws in my new and improved understanding of bone remodeling.

So the bottom line? If you are confident about your CTX results, it appears your bones are likely not being properly prepared for the osteoblastic production of new bone.

If it was me, I would be looking for a medical consult about what can be done to increase the CTX score. I would be reluctant to play doctor on myself even though it might be tempting to simply stop taking/reducing the post-Prolia alendronate. Perhaps some other medical condition is depressing the CTX score?

REPLY
@rjd

You asked a question about whether there should be concern about your low CTX scores. The only responses to your initial query that I saw were: 1) low CTX is good and 2) others posting CTX results similar to yours.

I am going to play devil's advocate here. It seems to me that it is possible that CTX can be too low. First, I note several posts indicating that dental work is not recommended with CTX lower than 150. Second, I considered the established reference range of about 171-970...seems to me there ought to be a reason why the reference range low is about 170. Perhaps, we are just perplexed about what that reason might be (in addition to the dental issue.)

Third, I reviewed relevant sections of McCormick's Great Bones....and that produced a bonanza of info. McCormick prefers a different CTX relevant range for post-menopausal women (his suggested range is 100-375). He does not want to see anything below 100 because....

"....bone needs to have osteoclastic bone resorption. If resorption activity gets too low, it can lead to adynamic, or low-turnover, fragile bone, which will increase fracture risk and predisposed a patient to osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures." (P. 148.)

McCormick's take on a too low CTX score comports with my new conceptual understanding of the dynamics of bone remodeling (see below.)

He further strongly urges a testing protocol for CTX of having blood drawn a) as early in the day as possible;b) after a night of strict fasting (he says CTX can go down 20% without fasting) and c) to stop taking any biotin and collagen supps for 48 hours.

I assume you followed this protocol?

I have admittedly had trouble conceptually with what is often described as a 'dynamic process' of bone breakdown and bone creation. This process is often referenced as 'bone remodeling.' But I still search for better info about what the balance or the relationship between these 2 processes might be.

I recently viewed a video posted in one of the Connect threads. https://youtu.be/Cd0YT-OV97c?si=FHXCpupgt1A5AaQP. It really helped me understand some things.

As a result, I now see bone remodeling as similar to painting. (Chuckling is allowed.)

Everyone knows that when something needs to be painted, you just do not slap a coat of paint on top of the old paint and call it a day. Rather, you want to prepare the surface for a new coat of paint. For example, removing peeling paint and certainly doing some sanding. Proper prep work makes the difference for the application of a new coat of paint that will last.

Likewise bone formation needs proper prep of the existing bone via the resorption activity of osteoclastic cells.

Now that you are finished chuckling about my painting analogy, would appreciate any thoughts about anyone seeing flaws in my new and improved understanding of bone remodeling.

So the bottom line? If you are confident about your CTX results, it appears your bones are likely not being properly prepared for the osteoblastic production of new bone.

If it was me, I would be looking for a medical consult about what can be done to increase the CTX score. I would be reluctant to play doctor on myself even though it might be tempting to simply stop taking/reducing the post-Prolia alendronate. Perhaps some other medical condition is depressing the CTX score?

Jump to this post

Thank you, rjd, for your thoughts and feedback, and i do think your "painting" analogy is appropriate!

I have read about the risks of doing any invasive dental work while on bisphosphonates so will be keeping this in mind on my dental visits

I believe the reference CTX range of 171-970 is not actually a target or ideal range but merely the observed CTX values of healthy people in the relevant age group. On the other hand, Dr McCormick was suggesting a target range of 100-375

For now, i plan to carry on with my weekly Alendronate and schedule another BTM test in 3-4 months

Many thanks and all the best!

REPLY
@formisc

Thank you, rjd, for your thoughts and feedback, and i do think your "painting" analogy is appropriate!

I have read about the risks of doing any invasive dental work while on bisphosphonates so will be keeping this in mind on my dental visits

I believe the reference CTX range of 171-970 is not actually a target or ideal range but merely the observed CTX values of healthy people in the relevant age group. On the other hand, Dr McCormick was suggesting a target range of 100-375

For now, i plan to carry on with my weekly Alendronate and schedule another BTM test in 3-4 months

Many thanks and all the best!

Jump to this post

You are quite correct about the typical CTX reference range. I had forgotten it simply reflects what was observed among healthy folks in various age groups.

Not very helpful therefore in trying to understand what might or might not be happening with a very low CTX score and whether/why it should be concerning.

Now that I have a bit better grasp of the concept of bone remodeling, I would be concerned about a low CTX score for the reasons given by McCormick.

Bone density and bone strength might be related but are likely not the same. While osteopenic, I took 2 very bad falls, each on a hard surface. One should have resulted in a broken wrist; the other in a broken bone in the hip area. They were both painful and took forever to get better....but no bone breaks.

Those 2 incidents began my personal questioning about bone density as the test for determining treatment. And about bone density increasing with bisphosphonate treatment, when the mechanism of that increase may be more like slapping on a coat of paint without proper prep work.

Surely this area of medical research and practice can do better. Best of luck with your bones.

REPLY
@rjd

You are quite correct about the typical CTX reference range. I had forgotten it simply reflects what was observed among healthy folks in various age groups.

Not very helpful therefore in trying to understand what might or might not be happening with a very low CTX score and whether/why it should be concerning.

Now that I have a bit better grasp of the concept of bone remodeling, I would be concerned about a low CTX score for the reasons given by McCormick.

Bone density and bone strength might be related but are likely not the same. While osteopenic, I took 2 very bad falls, each on a hard surface. One should have resulted in a broken wrist; the other in a broken bone in the hip area. They were both painful and took forever to get better....but no bone breaks.

Those 2 incidents began my personal questioning about bone density as the test for determining treatment. And about bone density increasing with bisphosphonate treatment, when the mechanism of that increase may be more like slapping on a coat of paint without proper prep work.

Surely this area of medical research and practice can do better. Best of luck with your bones.

Jump to this post

From what i have read, for those who quit Prolia "cold turkey", CTX reverts back to normal after around 30 months from the last Prolia injection

As i do not have any baseline number to compare with, i have to assume that my current low CTX is not my normal baseline (as it was only approx 11 months from my last injection) but the result of the Prolia and subsequent Alendronate and that it will rise once i stop my Alendronate

The main issue then, i guess, is knowing when to start easing off on Alendronate and most of the literature suggest a minimum transition period of 1 year

REPLY

Just read this article on fracture risk when Prolia is discontinued. It covers risk when oral and IV bisphosphonates are discontinued as well. IV Reclast is the safest in this regard.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/can-we-withdraw-treatment-in-post-menopausal-osteoporosis/ar-BB1o6Tav?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ACTS&cvid=583f1aee88974a24886a1443198639fa&ei=7
REPLY
@rjd

You asked a question about whether there should be concern about your low CTX scores. The only responses to your initial query that I saw were: 1) low CTX is good and 2) others posting CTX results similar to yours.

I am going to play devil's advocate here. It seems to me that it is possible that CTX can be too low. First, I note several posts indicating that dental work is not recommended with CTX lower than 150. Second, I considered the established reference range of about 171-970...seems to me there ought to be a reason why the reference range low is about 170. Perhaps, we are just perplexed about what that reason might be (in addition to the dental issue.)

Third, I reviewed relevant sections of McCormick's Great Bones....and that produced a bonanza of info. McCormick prefers a different CTX relevant range for post-menopausal women (his suggested range is 100-375). He does not want to see anything below 100 because....

"....bone needs to have osteoclastic bone resorption. If resorption activity gets too low, it can lead to adynamic, or low-turnover, fragile bone, which will increase fracture risk and predisposed a patient to osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures." (P. 148.)

McCormick's take on a too low CTX score comports with my new conceptual understanding of the dynamics of bone remodeling (see below.)

He further strongly urges a testing protocol for CTX of having blood drawn a) as early in the day as possible;b) after a night of strict fasting (he says CTX can go down 20% without fasting) and c) to stop taking any biotin and collagen supps for 48 hours.

I assume you followed this protocol?

I have admittedly had trouble conceptually with what is often described as a 'dynamic process' of bone breakdown and bone creation. This process is often referenced as 'bone remodeling.' But I still search for better info about what the balance or the relationship between these 2 processes might be.

I recently viewed a video posted in one of the Connect threads. https://youtu.be/Cd0YT-OV97c?si=FHXCpupgt1A5AaQP. It really helped me understand some things.

As a result, I now see bone remodeling as similar to painting. (Chuckling is allowed.)

Everyone knows that when something needs to be painted, you just do not slap a coat of paint on top of the old paint and call it a day. Rather, you want to prepare the surface for a new coat of paint. For example, removing peeling paint and certainly doing some sanding. Proper prep work makes the difference for the application of a new coat of paint that will last.

Likewise bone formation needs proper prep of the existing bone via the resorption activity of osteoclastic cells.

Now that you are finished chuckling about my painting analogy, would appreciate any thoughts about anyone seeing flaws in my new and improved understanding of bone remodeling.

So the bottom line? If you are confident about your CTX results, it appears your bones are likely not being properly prepared for the osteoblastic production of new bone.

If it was me, I would be looking for a medical consult about what can be done to increase the CTX score. I would be reluctant to play doctor on myself even though it might be tempting to simply stop taking/reducing the post-Prolia alendronate. Perhaps some other medical condition is depressing the CTX score?

Jump to this post

My CTX is below 50 obtained less than a month before my next scheduled Prolia shot. I had to find my own way to get that done by the way. I just had a consult with Dr. McCormick. He suggested I delay the June 17 shot which I am. I appreciate your comment about too low. I was unaware of that. I read it now also in Great Bones. In fact, I may still be having compression fractures. Dr. M is trying to help me determine this. It is scary and confusing. I feel I am operating in " no man's land"

REPLY
@awesomemomx2

My CTX is below 50 obtained less than a month before my next scheduled Prolia shot. I had to find my own way to get that done by the way. I just had a consult with Dr. McCormick. He suggested I delay the June 17 shot which I am. I appreciate your comment about too low. I was unaware of that. I read it now also in Great Bones. In fact, I may still be having compression fractures. Dr. M is trying to help me determine this. It is scary and confusing. I feel I am operating in " no man's land"

Jump to this post

I can understand how scary and confusing this must feel. The entire osteo landscape often seems like 'no man's land' to me.

I just reviewed all your postings because I wanted more info about your statement that you 'may still be having compression fractures.' Still?????? Could you please expand on that as I see no previous reference to any fractures?

Perhaps also Gently might weigh in as she concurred with your previous effort to obtain a CTX test.

I am sorry but today is completely filled with pre-existing commitments. But I will try to give this some thought and check in again some time tonight.

Meanwhile, I think I would have done exactly as you did in response to such a low CTX number....get a consult with Dr. M for consideration.

REPLY
@rjd

I can understand how scary and confusing this must feel. The entire osteo landscape often seems like 'no man's land' to me.

I just reviewed all your postings because I wanted more info about your statement that you 'may still be having compression fractures.' Still?????? Could you please expand on that as I see no previous reference to any fractures?

Perhaps also Gently might weigh in as she concurred with your previous effort to obtain a CTX test.

I am sorry but today is completely filled with pre-existing commitments. But I will try to give this some thought and check in again some time tonight.

Meanwhile, I think I would have done exactly as you did in response to such a low CTX number....get a consult with Dr. M for consideration.

Jump to this post

I don't have my notes I'm front of me now, because I am on the road. I had a compression fracture on T12 that I was aware and just found out that I evidently had them in L1- L4 after having a scan for another unrelated problem which no one in 2021 related to me until I went to another doctor
From Mayo in her report in the portal in 2024. Dr. McCormick wanted to see xrays to determine if I am still fracturing while on Prolia. My GP did order for me so I could send off to him. We need to know that in regards to knowing next step. Thanks for your help and support.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.