Would you recommend proton therapy vs surgical removal of prostate?

Looking for positive feedback. I am 59yr AA male, diagnosed with prostate cancer. My PSA has been 4.86 to 5.46 over the last 6 mths. My Gleason score was 3+3=6, 3+3=6 group 1, with one score reading of 3+4=7. I recently spoke with my urologist and we meet on 22 Dec 2025. I have been working with 2 separate Urologist to confirm diagnosis. Now that I have the confirmation I need I am really not in favor of the invasive robotic removal. I have done my research into other less invasive treatments of which were not initially brought up by the doctors. One is Cybernife radiation treatment and the most recent is Proton therapy treatment. I would like to if anyone has heard of any good results for men just under 60 to have proton therapy or cyberknife and what type of feedback was recieved. What were some side effects if any at all? Why aren't the doctors recommending these options outside of the cost. I have been told by some doctors if you do radiation first that they will not do a removal if the cancer returns. Why is that. My final thought is if PSA is not the sole determining factor for someone to have cancer why is it looked at that way. Finally what is the possibility that cancer has been present for ones entire life and has only become a discussion due to a biopsy.. Why cant it continue under surveillance? Help me unravel my thoughts. However I am leaning more towards trying the the Proton therapy. Please share feedback thank you for listening and I apologize for any confusion.