Usage of Immunotherapy , HIFU , Cryoabalation , NanoKnife , TULSA PRO.
Apparently, these treatments really only work properly with somebody who has a Gleason of 3+4 or less. I have been recommending looking into them for people that have higher Gleason scores, It appears I was wrong about that and they should not need to investigate those techniques because they aren’t going to work well with those higher Gleason cases.
A 3+4 with intraductal or cribriform would also not be looking for those treatments.
I would love to hear from somebody in here that has had one of those treatments with a high Gleason score, and how successful it was.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Various links
Tulsa
https://tulsaprocedure.com/find-a-tulsa-pro-center/
https://tulsaprocedure.com/
If wondering about Tulsa Pro from a science point of view, here is a basic Tulsa science overview article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9231661/
----
Vanquish
Trials
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05683691
a story on it
https://www.mnphy.com/1023-story-one--christopher-dixon
More info
https://www.francismedical.com/tag/vanquish/