urologist and radiation oncologist aren't on the same page

Posted by bluegill @bluegill, Jan 23 4:25pm

Urologist: There's a bit of cancer still there in the prostate, but all I need to do is to stay on ADT for the rest of my life, and I'll be fine. Maybe even for 20 years!

Radiation oncologist: (based on same PSMA results) my cancer is back, and we need to deal with it aggressively and soon! I need an MRI and then seed implants. For people like me, ADT would work for only a year or two, then the cancer would come roaring back.

(1st diagnosed 4 years ago, Gleason 9, PSA of 28. Radiation + 3 years ADT. Went off ADT last year and PSA shot up. Now back on Eligard.)

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for nikolai57 @nikolai57

Definitely get a third opinion. My particulars were different to yours, but my situation was similar in that my urosurgeon disagreed with my RO and MO. I got a third opinion at MSKCC, and felt confident going with the recommendation I got there, which was a tweak of the MO’s recommendation. I recently finished my therapy, and so far so good. Although my treatments have been local, my doc at MSKCC has also been following me, and I feel better knowing that if there is a recurrence, I already have a doc there who knows the whole history.

Jump to this post

If you can find one, get a third opinion from a prostate oncologist (hard to find) who is agnostic to treatment options.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.