Super Bowl Ad: Relax Your Tight End

Posted by smoore4 @smoore4, Feb 9 8:02am

One of the best ads of the Super Bowl was the PSA screening ad by Novartis. It's great to see this kind of exposure, particularly for the exact demographic that needs to see it.

Ad:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/novartis-relax-your-tight-end-super-bowl-2026-rob-gronkowski/84196fbde7fbeead950a13fb

Steve

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

I don't, however, understand why Gronk is in a Bucs jersey!? I know he played for them, but he is famously a NE Patriot. That's a head-scratcher.

REPLY

Good commercial, game not so good.

Serious question though. Even though many PCPs no longer do PSA/DRE for men in their 70s, do we all agree that is a bad practice? Even an older man should know if he potentially has PCa, correct? How he chooses to treat it, that's a different topic, but even goes 70++ should get PSAs regularly?

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff1963 @jeff1963

Good commercial, game not so good.

Serious question though. Even though many PCPs no longer do PSA/DRE for men in their 70s, do we all agree that is a bad practice? Even an older man should know if he potentially has PCa, correct? How he chooses to treat it, that's a different topic, but even goes 70++ should get PSAs regularly?

Jump to this post

@jeff1963 ABSOLUTELY!!!

REPLY

Wow. That was perfect. Thankyou for highlighting that.
I have zero interest in American football & couldn't name one team, so would never have seen that.
Very well done.

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff1963 @jeff1963

Good commercial, game not so good.

Serious question though. Even though many PCPs no longer do PSA/DRE for men in their 70s, do we all agree that is a bad practice? Even an older man should know if he potentially has PCa, correct? How he chooses to treat it, that's a different topic, but even goes 70++ should get PSAs regularly?

Jump to this post

@jeff1963 It depends. If during my 40s, 50s, to late-60s, my normal PSA stayed very low, then it’s a different situation than if my PSA is 6, 7, or 8+ at those ages per the Mayo age-related PSA chart. (See attached.)

(Even when I was younger, whether to get a PSA test was my call, not my PCPs.)

As I get older and my time horizon gets shorter and shorter, the decision whether to continue PSA testing has to be made. Now understanding how slow-growing PCa is, at 80+ I’d only get a PSA test if I was already getting other bloodwork done. (I’m 70-1/2 now, so that date is not too far away.)

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff1963 @jeff1963

Good commercial, game not so good.

Serious question though. Even though many PCPs no longer do PSA/DRE for men in their 70s, do we all agree that is a bad practice? Even an older man should know if he potentially has PCa, correct? How he chooses to treat it, that's a different topic, but even goes 70++ should get PSAs regularly?

Jump to this post

@jeff1963
Yes! Get PSA tested into the 70's.
I was 75 but the PC turned out to be aggressive and escaped the capsule. Glad I had the RALP and PSA staying negligible.

REPLY
Profile picture for grandpun @grandpun

@jeff1963
Yes! Get PSA tested into the 70's.
I was 75 but the PC turned out to be aggressive and escaped the capsule. Glad I had the RALP and PSA staying negligible.

Jump to this post

@grandpun When you were diagnosed with PCa at 75y, had you already been getting annual PSA tests throughout your 40s, 50s, and 60s?

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@grandpun When you were diagnosed with PCa at 75y, had you already been getting annual PSA tests throughout your 40s, 50s, and 60s?

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis
Not regularly till I had a bout of BPH at age ~72. Then regularly every 6-months at urologist's direction. My 2-ish values then shot up to 5. In the next 3-months (before RALP) I had two biopsies. First was negative, second found the PC with some aggressive cells. That's when decision made for prostatectomy

REPLY
Profile picture for grandpun @grandpun

@brianjarvis
Not regularly till I had a bout of BPH at age ~72. Then regularly every 6-months at urologist's direction. My 2-ish values then shot up to 5. In the next 3-months (before RALP) I had two biopsies. First was negative, second found the PC with some aggressive cells. That's when decision made for prostatectomy

Jump to this post

@grandpun That’s a lesson-learned for all guys - start testing early and annually. Waiting until late-60s or early-70s results in a possibly badly-stacked deck, with possibly fewer options.

When I was 45y, I told my family doctor that I wanted to start having annual PSA tests. That was waaaaay back in 2000. Tested every year…..then, we found low-grade, localized PCa in 2012; went on active surveillance for about 9 years (buying me time to evaluate treatments); then had proton beam radiation in 2021.

These days, just PSA tests every 6 months….just another day.

REPLY

Yes indeed!
My dad had PC, my older bro had PC, then me. So I ordered!! my two boys (in their 40's) to get annual tests.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.