Rising PSA's after treatment - an answer

Posted by dpcarriere @dpcarriere, May 12, 2022

First let me reintroduce myself. I'm one of the grade 10's. An aggressive 10 at that so I have to be on top of things - the alternatives aren't attractive. I've had Proton Beam Therapy with Lupron. Lupron prior to Proton Beam to lower tumor activity and continuing post to prevent reoccurance - just in case.

Now then - I've seen a lot of queries regarding PSA values after treatments, whatever the treatment is. The questions have been - what's a good value, or what's a bad value, or what do any changes mean?

Here's the bottom line. No two of us are alike. Thank God for that!! So no two tumors are alike either. This whole cancer treatment protocol is pretty much individual with some common threads. So the answer to PSA values as I understand the big picture is not one of specific values. Your PSA of 0.9 may be of some value to you but meaningless to me. What IS of value is a trend line. Spot numbers are of little to no value. What your physician is looking for is a trend line. PSA values over time are the numbers of consideration. Bye and large this is a slow growing tumor - which is why I'm still here and able to report in every now and then. Again, the answer is a TREND LINE. You will be alarmed when your PSA's are continuously rising. Else enjoy a scotch with me. Happy day.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@consultant

That pretty much sums up the point I was making but I was referring to treatment strategies at much earlier stages. So the paper essentially contradicts what I'm advocating but I still question how solid the data is given very few patients probably did triplet when they were pre-(clinical) metastatic. Regarding certain cohorts of mHSPC patients it states:

"While early, aggressive treatment intensification with triplet regimens, with or without primary radiotherapy, may seem attractive in this cohort of patients to maximize survival outcomes, the reality is that such “maximal” treatment intensification is unnecessary in the majority of these patients."

Jump to this post

I posted to reinforce what you are saying.

Ours is not a homogenous disease. Every scrap of clinical data must be scrutinized when making treatment decision in concert with our medical team.

We also need to understand the significance of terms and their difference, radiographic vs progression free versus overall survival...

Nobody wants to over treat, neither do we want to miss the window of opportunity to impact the course of our cancer by under treating.

I always feel comfortable in my treatment decisions because I believe it is an informed decision, based on my clinical data and in concert with the training, education, experience and support of my medical team.

REPLY
@spino

Where do you find this stuff, Kevin? This is great. Of course, I hope it's irrelevant for a long time for me, but I know it isn't for you and might not be for me. Anyway, thanks.

Jump to this post

Early in my journey when I knew almost nothing...what is a prostate, where is it, what does it do...my literature searches would take me to sites such as Uro Today.

I would subscribe to their daily newsletters. Some days they are pertinent, some not so much.

You learn to scan, find the pertinent and interesting articles and read through them.

REPLY
@consultant

Sorry to hear about your sister. You make a good point and it's one I've told friends and family when they ask how I'm doing. I tell them so far so good but the worse thing about this disease so far is that for the rest of my life I'll never know if the cancer is truly gone and never coming back. The common 5-year remissions = cure is a bunch of BS in my mind with cancer in general. It's an odds game. A lot of people (without cancer) think, they cut it out and your tests are good a few years later so it's all gone right? Unfortunately maybe not and that's hard to live with in the back of your head. I have a new found respect for the mental fortitude anyone diagnosed with cancer has to have LONG TERM.

Because the progression with PCa can be so slow it's not like a life attitude altering, near death experience, type of thing. In general I think when we are young (like teenagers or in our 20's) disease and death are not even in our mind's picture. At middle age, being diagnosed with cancer, even one of the most treatable ones, the foreboding of potentially going through more aggressive therapies and having a chronic disease the rest of your life is quite depressing and anxiety causing, especially waiting for PSA test results. I am slowly with each passing month trying to reframe my perspective about having the diagnosis and mortality in general. So far, it has had a far greater negative effective on me psychologically than physically. The pee bag and couple of months of significant urinary incontinence weren't fun but that's just a drop in the bucket (no pun intended) of eventually being on some kind of treatment for the rest of your life.

This diagnosis has really put the fact that something is eventually going to get me right front and center in my mind at my middle age. A massive heart attack in my 80's would be a blessing in disguise for me and my family relative to all other other things that could take you. Especially the slowly progressive neurodegenerative diseases.

Sorry I've gone off track a bit but I'm finding the discussion in this thread both informative and comforting. It feels better to discuss your situation with others more or less in the your same shoes.

But I'll be darned if I don't give it the "college try" to nip the problem at the bud if there's still a chance of doing that.

Even though this forum is targeted at more advanced stage, I've found the participants here to be far more knowledgeable in general than other forums discussing any aspect of the disease at any stage.

Jump to this post

The comments on this thread all resonate with me.

1 - Tx: Having had BCR at 1st postop PSA of .19, I was "spared" some of the wait & worry because I was directed to the Rad Onc and salvage radiation together with 4 mos ADT.
Post salvage tx PSA in Nov undetectable at < .02.
Now, I wait and worry for the 2d post salvage PSA in Feb. And wait, and wait (as in Casablanca).

2 - emotional: If PSA remains undetectable for a period of years (as predicted by the optimistic Rad Onc), I will be very, very happy; but will continue to live with the dread of the "knock on the door" of recurrence.
And people do not understand the foreboding. I am a positive person, but when almost certain recurrence is in your future with G 9 and EPE, that knowledge or expectation is always present.
And yes, friends and family think removal/treatment = cure. And if I have "the big one, Alice", before recurrence, then effectively they would be correct. If not...

3 - protocols: Clearly unclear.
SPPORT trial suggests salvage radiation to the whole prostate area and pelvic lymph nodes together with ADT has good outcomes (Kevin, you were correct and ahead of the curve).
Salvage tx sweet spot of .2 to .4/.5 has been trending lower.
The belief (aah, that word again) that PCa remains in the prostate bed/lymph nodes in the absence of PSMA PET identification at low levels of PSA was the basis of salvage tx for me. Hopes and prayers 🙏 for all of us is all that I can conclude. And may treatment breakthroughs be on the horizon.

4 - PSA monitoring post salvage tx: Regular PSA testing with a < .1 sensitivity may make some practical sense. I am receiving uPSA testing, however 2 of my tx buddies, each with a different Rad Onc, are testing with regular PSA tests.
And when my PSA rises above .02 and is detectable, but less than .1, what will that accomplish other than worry me? Because unless we are going to treat below .1 ...?
A 3rd RP friend (no BCR in over 3 yrs) is freaking out because his PSA went from .00something to still .00something higher (you get the point).

And yes, it does feel comforting to communicate these thoughts, concerns and fears with brothers in arms in this battle.

Best to all.

REPLY
@kujhawk1978

Early in my journey when I knew almost nothing...what is a prostate, where is it, what does it do...my literature searches would take me to sites such as Uro Today.

I would subscribe to their daily newsletters. Some days they are pertinent, some not so much.

You learn to scan, find the pertinent and interesting articles and read through them.

Jump to this post

Thanks. I had been using practiceupdate.com, but they dropped their urology coverage. I just signed up on Uro Today.

REPLY
@michaelcharles

The comments on this thread all resonate with me.

1 - Tx: Having had BCR at 1st postop PSA of .19, I was "spared" some of the wait & worry because I was directed to the Rad Onc and salvage radiation together with 4 mos ADT.
Post salvage tx PSA in Nov undetectable at < .02.
Now, I wait and worry for the 2d post salvage PSA in Feb. And wait, and wait (as in Casablanca).

2 - emotional: If PSA remains undetectable for a period of years (as predicted by the optimistic Rad Onc), I will be very, very happy; but will continue to live with the dread of the "knock on the door" of recurrence.
And people do not understand the foreboding. I am a positive person, but when almost certain recurrence is in your future with G 9 and EPE, that knowledge or expectation is always present.
And yes, friends and family think removal/treatment = cure. And if I have "the big one, Alice", before recurrence, then effectively they would be correct. If not...

3 - protocols: Clearly unclear.
SPPORT trial suggests salvage radiation to the whole prostate area and pelvic lymph nodes together with ADT has good outcomes (Kevin, you were correct and ahead of the curve).
Salvage tx sweet spot of .2 to .4/.5 has been trending lower.
The belief (aah, that word again) that PCa remains in the prostate bed/lymph nodes in the absence of PSMA PET identification at low levels of PSA was the basis of salvage tx for me. Hopes and prayers 🙏 for all of us is all that I can conclude. And may treatment breakthroughs be on the horizon.

4 - PSA monitoring post salvage tx: Regular PSA testing with a < .1 sensitivity may make some practical sense. I am receiving uPSA testing, however 2 of my tx buddies, each with a different Rad Onc, are testing with regular PSA tests.
And when my PSA rises above .02 and is detectable, but less than .1, what will that accomplish other than worry me? Because unless we are going to treat below .1 ...?
A 3rd RP friend (no BCR in over 3 yrs) is freaking out because his PSA went from .00something to still .00something higher (you get the point).

And yes, it does feel comforting to communicate these thoughts, concerns and fears with brothers in arms in this battle.

Best to all.

Jump to this post

Haha, I'm just trying not to be that 3rd RP friend in #4 who is freaking out--and get ready for each day as it comes.

REPLY
@michaelcharles

The comments on this thread all resonate with me.

1 - Tx: Having had BCR at 1st postop PSA of .19, I was "spared" some of the wait & worry because I was directed to the Rad Onc and salvage radiation together with 4 mos ADT.
Post salvage tx PSA in Nov undetectable at < .02.
Now, I wait and worry for the 2d post salvage PSA in Feb. And wait, and wait (as in Casablanca).

2 - emotional: If PSA remains undetectable for a period of years (as predicted by the optimistic Rad Onc), I will be very, very happy; but will continue to live with the dread of the "knock on the door" of recurrence.
And people do not understand the foreboding. I am a positive person, but when almost certain recurrence is in your future with G 9 and EPE, that knowledge or expectation is always present.
And yes, friends and family think removal/treatment = cure. And if I have "the big one, Alice", before recurrence, then effectively they would be correct. If not...

3 - protocols: Clearly unclear.
SPPORT trial suggests salvage radiation to the whole prostate area and pelvic lymph nodes together with ADT has good outcomes (Kevin, you were correct and ahead of the curve).
Salvage tx sweet spot of .2 to .4/.5 has been trending lower.
The belief (aah, that word again) that PCa remains in the prostate bed/lymph nodes in the absence of PSMA PET identification at low levels of PSA was the basis of salvage tx for me. Hopes and prayers 🙏 for all of us is all that I can conclude. And may treatment breakthroughs be on the horizon.

4 - PSA monitoring post salvage tx: Regular PSA testing with a < .1 sensitivity may make some practical sense. I am receiving uPSA testing, however 2 of my tx buddies, each with a different Rad Onc, are testing with regular PSA tests.
And when my PSA rises above .02 and is detectable, but less than .1, what will that accomplish other than worry me? Because unless we are going to treat below .1 ...?
A 3rd RP friend (no BCR in over 3 yrs) is freaking out because his PSA went from .00something to still .00something higher (you get the point).

And yes, it does feel comforting to communicate these thoughts, concerns and fears with brothers in arms in this battle.

Best to all.

Jump to this post

"A 3rd RP friend (no BCR in over 3 yrs) is freaking out because his PSA went from .00something to still .00something higher (you get the point)."

It still baffles me any clinic would give patients their results to three decimals in any scenario. It's useless based on all the data to date and only creates unnecessary anxiety. There are some studies that show 0.01 and 0.015 were predictive but even 0.02 was not more than 75% accurate at best. Even if say two readings at or above 0.015 was confirmation of BCR, I doubt there's a single Urologist, Radiologist or Oncologist in the world that would recommend any treatment at that PSA level unless the doubling time was say, 4 months or less. Seems no one these days believe there's any advantage to doing SRT prior to 0.05. So there's no point of it no matter how you look at it. It's only detrimental to the patient psychologically.

When my result went from < 0.02 to 0.02 and I reached out to local small city Urology clinic about it, they were like that's a GREAT PSA you have nothing to worry about. Ya maybe relative to your patients about to go on Lupron with a PSA of 5. And even a gal at UCSF said, some labs don't use the < sign. Well if my lab changed their practice, they should have told me. Both naive responses in my opinion. Yes, I know it's no confirmation of BCR at this point but should I be testing in 2 month instead of 3 month intervals now? They both said "just keep monitoring" with no other information. (For uPSA, I doubt it since it didn't jump to 0.03 or 0.04)

REPLY
@consultant

"A 3rd RP friend (no BCR in over 3 yrs) is freaking out because his PSA went from .00something to still .00something higher (you get the point)."

It still baffles me any clinic would give patients their results to three decimals in any scenario. It's useless based on all the data to date and only creates unnecessary anxiety. There are some studies that show 0.01 and 0.015 were predictive but even 0.02 was not more than 75% accurate at best. Even if say two readings at or above 0.015 was confirmation of BCR, I doubt there's a single Urologist, Radiologist or Oncologist in the world that would recommend any treatment at that PSA level unless the doubling time was say, 4 months or less. Seems no one these days believe there's any advantage to doing SRT prior to 0.05. So there's no point of it no matter how you look at it. It's only detrimental to the patient psychologically.

When my result went from < 0.02 to 0.02 and I reached out to local small city Urology clinic about it, they were like that's a GREAT PSA you have nothing to worry about. Ya maybe relative to your patients about to go on Lupron with a PSA of 5. And even a gal at UCSF said, some labs don't use the < sign. Well if my lab changed their practice, they should have told me. Both naive responses in my opinion. Yes, I know it's no confirmation of BCR at this point but should I be testing in 2 month instead of 3 month intervals now? They both said "just keep monitoring" with no other information. (For uPSA, I doubt it since it didn't jump to 0.03 or 0.04)

Jump to this post

My mind says to initiate salvage treatment as soon as possible.
I feel relatively fortunate (?) that with a PSA of .19 after RP, I had immediate radiation treatment to the whole pelvic region (WPRT) and the pelvic lymph nodes, together with 4 months of ADT.
The time for treatment, to paraphrase Kevin, is when you individually and under your circumstances believe that you have evidence of BCR or a definitive trend toward BCR.
Without regard to the actual PSA.
If a PSMA PET scan is negative; all the better.
If not, that's probably a fork in the road, or a European roundabout.
And, do not fear the course of salvage treatment.
Yes, the ADT sucks. I had a relatively mild case of side effects, and they still sucked.
And yes, the radiation can be a problem. I had a particularly severe case of radiation proctitis (probably related to the necessity of a balloon insertion), but it all cleared up about 4 weeks after radiation ended.
So God and good fortune willing, you will never require additional post RP treatment. I know 2 men who had RP over 10 years ago and have not had a recurrence.
Just my thoughts; wishing all well and thanks for your comments and input.

REPLY
@michaelcharles

My mind says to initiate salvage treatment as soon as possible.
I feel relatively fortunate (?) that with a PSA of .19 after RP, I had immediate radiation treatment to the whole pelvic region (WPRT) and the pelvic lymph nodes, together with 4 months of ADT.
The time for treatment, to paraphrase Kevin, is when you individually and under your circumstances believe that you have evidence of BCR or a definitive trend toward BCR.
Without regard to the actual PSA.
If a PSMA PET scan is negative; all the better.
If not, that's probably a fork in the road, or a European roundabout.
And, do not fear the course of salvage treatment.
Yes, the ADT sucks. I had a relatively mild case of side effects, and they still sucked.
And yes, the radiation can be a problem. I had a particularly severe case of radiation proctitis (probably related to the necessity of a balloon insertion), but it all cleared up about 4 weeks after radiation ended.
So God and good fortune willing, you will never require additional post RP treatment. I know 2 men who had RP over 10 years ago and have not had a recurrence.
Just my thoughts; wishing all well and thanks for your comments and input.

Jump to this post

Well I talked to Dr. Kishan (the radiation oncology expert) at UCLA today. He was pretty confident a 0.02 was an early sign of BCR. One recent study I read said only 25% of cases did not see a PSA progression after reaching 0.02, so that's why 0.03 is the new 0.2 in a sense as basically no cases escaped BCR once you reached 0.03. So I was surprised he was pretty confident 0.02 is the start of BCR. I can't remember the figure, think it was like 99% confidence. He said many people mainly delay to 0.1 or later just to delay having to experience the potential side effects, or they have a very long doubling time, or they are very old. A lot of people are very scared of radiation treatment. He of course agreed it would not be wise to wait to 0.3 when something may show on a PSMA scan since my tumor, from the pathology report, was fully contained and cancer was not found in any of my 14 lymph nodes and had not escaped the capsule. Obviously if I'm starting BCR there are cancer cells circulating outside where my prostate was but in tiny amounts. I have read that there can be small amounts of tissue left behind that are non-cancerous that produce PSA but he didn't pose that as a potential cause of the 0.02 PSA so maybe that is very rare

His opinion has been that there isn't any data to show a significant reduction in chance of cure waiting to do SRT up to 0.1. My logical argument to him was, but sooner can only be better if you're sure of BCR and his response was then we should schedule SRT now! I said "hold on" lol, I think my personal choice based on both your opinion and the studies I've read is I'll wait until two successive increasing results => 0.03, or, I get a result => 0.05. If I went from a 0.02 to 0.05 in 3 months I wouldn't wait for another confirming result. Like many have said here, it's a personal choice based on your analysis of the available data and input from your oncologist/radiologist.

REPLY

Solid reasoning. Clearly you are not comfortable moving forward with salvage tx at this time. And the best is that you are thinking and researching now at a very low PSA.
Best wishes.

REPLY
@kujhawk1978

Yep, a single data point not a reason to hit the panic button. If that were the case I would have gone back on treatment several years ago.

I did not hit the panic button, neither did my urologist. Good decision.

Jump to this post

Kujhawk1978. I receive epic inspiration each time I read your graph. It gives me a sense of logic to this this journey we are on.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.