Rectal Cancer - Hospital Recommendation

Posted by mrt2024 @mrt2024, Mar 10 4:11pm

Hi everyone.

Unfortunately, my father has recently been diagnosed with stage 3 colorectal cancer, and we are seeking recommendations for hospitals and oncologists in the Virginia area.

We are currently considering options such as the University of Virginia (UVA), VHC Health (a member of the Mayo Clinic Care Network), and other institutions. If you have experience with hospitals or oncologists in Virginia, particularly regarding their treatment approaches for stage 3 colorectal cancer, we would greatly appreciate your insights and recommendations.

Our priority is to ensure that my father receives the best possible care and support during this challenging time. Your advice and personal experiences will be invaluable to us as we explore our options and make informed decisions.

Thank you for your assistance.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Colorectal Cancer Support Group.

@verol65

I had a transanal resection when we thought the polyp I had was pre-cancerous. The post op biopsy revealed positive margins (rectal cancer). My surgeon at the time and the oncologist said no new surgery because of closeness to the sphincter and because at eyesight there is nothing left to see. So I had radiotherapy.
8 months after the RT, when looking for a second opinion on how to fix the rectovaginal fistula it had provoked, my current surgeon was a different opinion. He said they should have operated again and taken a wait and see attitude in relation to radiotherapy. A third oncologist who is also a surgeon was of the same opinion.
So, @mrt2024 , if you can take a second opinion, do so before taking a final decision about your treatment.

Jump to this post

Today, we finally had the opportunity to meet with the oncologist. We addressed all the questions lingering in our minds. Unfortunately, there is also a tumor detected on my father's right kidney. The report indicates it as "suspicious," raising concerns about a second primary cancer. It is not related to colorectal cancer. It is kidney renal cancer. I asked whether it was definitive, and if not, how we would determine it. The response was that a biopsy isn't conducted for that; there's a 90% chance that it is cancer. Therefore, we proceed with treatment as if it were cancer, but it's also necessary to consult a urologist. The cancer is classified as stage 1.

Despite the situation, I'm trying to stay optimistic, considering the 93% treatability rate I found online.

Regarding the rectal cancer, it's classified as stage 3. The oncologist mentioned a treatment success rate of over 70% if we opt for chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There's no invasion of the anal sphincter, and due to the tumor's location, a temporary colostomy will be required, no permanent one, which is another bright side for us. He added, without chemotherapy and surgery, the success rate drops to 50%. My father is inclined towards pursuing all treatment options.

Once we've consulted the urologist and radiation oncologist, a treatment plan will be determined—whether to begin with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and then surgery, or to initiate radiotherapy with low-dose chemotherapy followed by surgery.

We were contemplating seeking a second opinion. The oncologist assured us that we have time; the rectal cancer's current stage won't suddenly progress to stage 4. However, we're hesitant to delay appointments with another set of specialists—urologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist—to make a decision. It's a challenging decision to make. Additionally, I'm uncertain whether we need to consult all four doctors for a second opinion or just one. If only one, which specialist should it be? Another surgeon or a medical oncologist? We have another appointment scheduled with my father's surgeon on Thursday, and I'll inquire about his perspective then.

REPLY
@mrt2024

Today, we finally had the opportunity to meet with the oncologist. We addressed all the questions lingering in our minds. Unfortunately, there is also a tumor detected on my father's right kidney. The report indicates it as "suspicious," raising concerns about a second primary cancer. It is not related to colorectal cancer. It is kidney renal cancer. I asked whether it was definitive, and if not, how we would determine it. The response was that a biopsy isn't conducted for that; there's a 90% chance that it is cancer. Therefore, we proceed with treatment as if it were cancer, but it's also necessary to consult a urologist. The cancer is classified as stage 1.

Despite the situation, I'm trying to stay optimistic, considering the 93% treatability rate I found online.

Regarding the rectal cancer, it's classified as stage 3. The oncologist mentioned a treatment success rate of over 70% if we opt for chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There's no invasion of the anal sphincter, and due to the tumor's location, a temporary colostomy will be required, no permanent one, which is another bright side for us. He added, without chemotherapy and surgery, the success rate drops to 50%. My father is inclined towards pursuing all treatment options.

Once we've consulted the urologist and radiation oncologist, a treatment plan will be determined—whether to begin with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and then surgery, or to initiate radiotherapy with low-dose chemotherapy followed by surgery.

We were contemplating seeking a second opinion. The oncologist assured us that we have time; the rectal cancer's current stage won't suddenly progress to stage 4. However, we're hesitant to delay appointments with another set of specialists—urologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist—to make a decision. It's a challenging decision to make. Additionally, I'm uncertain whether we need to consult all four doctors for a second opinion or just one. If only one, which specialist should it be? Another surgeon or a medical oncologist? We have another appointment scheduled with my father's surgeon on Thursday, and I'll inquire about his perspective then.

Jump to this post

Having another tumor elsewhere makes quite a difference. Do ask all the questions you can think of. You can consult https://fightcolorectalcancer.org/facing-colorectal-cancer/diagnosis-and-treatment/know-your-treatment-options/; it might help you define your questions.

There is a surgery that avoids a temporary colostomy. You could ask if it's an option for your dad. It's called a two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pullthrough (with coloanal anastomosis).

Also important is to maintain a positive attitude, trusting that you're getting the best care available to you.

Sending a big hug.

REPLY
@verol65

Having another tumor elsewhere makes quite a difference. Do ask all the questions you can think of. You can consult https://fightcolorectalcancer.org/facing-colorectal-cancer/diagnosis-and-treatment/know-your-treatment-options/; it might help you define your questions.

There is a surgery that avoids a temporary colostomy. You could ask if it's an option for your dad. It's called a two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pullthrough (with coloanal anastomosis).

Also important is to maintain a positive attitude, trusting that you're getting the best care available to you.

Sending a big hug.

Jump to this post

Thanks a lot. I didn't know that option. I'll definitely ask that option to the surgeon tomorrow.

REPLY
@mrt2024

Thanks a lot. I didn't know that option. I'll definitely ask that option to the surgeon tomorrow.

Jump to this post

This was the surgery I had to preserve my sphincter and avoid a colostomy at the same time. Should it be an option for your dad and should you, your dad and the doctors decide to go for it, feel free to contact me for a patient's view of what it is like.

REPLY
@mrt2024

Today, we finally had the opportunity to meet with the oncologist. We addressed all the questions lingering in our minds. Unfortunately, there is also a tumor detected on my father's right kidney. The report indicates it as "suspicious," raising concerns about a second primary cancer. It is not related to colorectal cancer. It is kidney renal cancer. I asked whether it was definitive, and if not, how we would determine it. The response was that a biopsy isn't conducted for that; there's a 90% chance that it is cancer. Therefore, we proceed with treatment as if it were cancer, but it's also necessary to consult a urologist. The cancer is classified as stage 1.

Despite the situation, I'm trying to stay optimistic, considering the 93% treatability rate I found online.

Regarding the rectal cancer, it's classified as stage 3. The oncologist mentioned a treatment success rate of over 70% if we opt for chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There's no invasion of the anal sphincter, and due to the tumor's location, a temporary colostomy will be required, no permanent one, which is another bright side for us. He added, without chemotherapy and surgery, the success rate drops to 50%. My father is inclined towards pursuing all treatment options.

Once we've consulted the urologist and radiation oncologist, a treatment plan will be determined—whether to begin with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and then surgery, or to initiate radiotherapy with low-dose chemotherapy followed by surgery.

We were contemplating seeking a second opinion. The oncologist assured us that we have time; the rectal cancer's current stage won't suddenly progress to stage 4. However, we're hesitant to delay appointments with another set of specialists—urologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist—to make a decision. It's a challenging decision to make. Additionally, I'm uncertain whether we need to consult all four doctors for a second opinion or just one. If only one, which specialist should it be? Another surgeon or a medical oncologist? We have another appointment scheduled with my father's surgeon on Thursday, and I'll inquire about his perspective then.

Jump to this post

I'd like to bring @dsh33782 (Don) into this discussion. Don didn't have rectal cancer, but rather inoperable esophageal cancer that was successfully treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Shortly after treatment for esophageal cancer, kidney lesions were discovered and shown to be cancerous - a second primary cancer. He was successfully treated for renal cancer too. I may be getting some of the details or timeline wrong. Don, please correct anything I mis-represented.

@mrt2024, I'm sharing Don's story hoping to offer you and your father hope. I know it's a lot to absorb and deal with, not one but two cancers. I'm sure your dad is grateful to have you by his side. Keep asking questions of the cancer care team. And if we can help with first-hand experiences, we will.

Regarding how many specialists to consult for a second opinion, is it possible that they will confer together? This is sometimes referred to as a tumor board where all team members discuss the case together. They do this a many cancer centers, including Mayo Clinic.

REPLY
@colleenyoung

I'd like to bring @dsh33782 (Don) into this discussion. Don didn't have rectal cancer, but rather inoperable esophageal cancer that was successfully treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Shortly after treatment for esophageal cancer, kidney lesions were discovered and shown to be cancerous - a second primary cancer. He was successfully treated for renal cancer too. I may be getting some of the details or timeline wrong. Don, please correct anything I mis-represented.

@mrt2024, I'm sharing Don's story hoping to offer you and your father hope. I know it's a lot to absorb and deal with, not one but two cancers. I'm sure your dad is grateful to have you by his side. Keep asking questions of the cancer care team. And if we can help with first-hand experiences, we will.

Regarding how many specialists to consult for a second opinion, is it possible that they will confer together? This is sometimes referred to as a tumor board where all team members discuss the case together. They do this a many cancer centers, including Mayo Clinic.

Jump to this post

@mrt2024
Coleen is correct. I first was treated for esophageal cancer with chemo and radiation. Then they found a kidney cancerous tumor and I had surgery to remove my right kideny. Since then the scans showed both the esophageal cancer tumor and the kidney cancer tumor were none and all the lymph nodes were back to normal. I feel very grateful for successful treatment. Please let me know if I can help answer questions?

REPLY
@verol65

This was the surgery I had to preserve my sphincter and avoid a colostomy at the same time. Should it be an option for your dad and should you, your dad and the doctors decide to go for it, feel free to contact me for a patient's view of what it is like.

Jump to this post

I am going to ask to doctor pros and cons if this procedure applicable to my father. I would like to hear if you had unexpected challenges or complications during your recovery period.

REPLY
@colleenyoung

I'd like to bring @dsh33782 (Don) into this discussion. Don didn't have rectal cancer, but rather inoperable esophageal cancer that was successfully treated with chemotherapy and radiation. Shortly after treatment for esophageal cancer, kidney lesions were discovered and shown to be cancerous - a second primary cancer. He was successfully treated for renal cancer too. I may be getting some of the details or timeline wrong. Don, please correct anything I mis-represented.

@mrt2024, I'm sharing Don's story hoping to offer you and your father hope. I know it's a lot to absorb and deal with, not one but two cancers. I'm sure your dad is grateful to have you by his side. Keep asking questions of the cancer care team. And if we can help with first-hand experiences, we will.

Regarding how many specialists to consult for a second opinion, is it possible that they will confer together? This is sometimes referred to as a tumor board where all team members discuss the case together. They do this a many cancer centers, including Mayo Clinic.

Jump to this post

It's truly overwhelming to absorb everything. I'm grateful that I'm not facing this alone; my three sisters and mom are all here to support my father. My father seems okay if he is not pretending. That's a relief. However, my oldest sister's pessimism weighs heavily on us. Despite my efforts to share survival statistics and details with her, she remains unconvinced. We make an effort to maintain a cheerful atmosphere around my father, but her attitude makes it challenging.

I'm trying to understand her feelings, but we all need strength to cope. Our conversations have prompted me to delve into the possibility of recurrence. Questions flood my mind: Will it return, and when? The odds of recurrence within five years are around 28%. Is it inevitable? He is 66 now. If it recurs in a decade or earlier, could it metastasize? Will he endure chemotherapy and surgeries again? Will his suffering be severe?

Even though it is difficult, I don't want to dwell on these uncertainties, I want to focus on the present. I hope for his successful treatment with minimal side effects and complications. However, maintaining optimism can sometimes be challenging.

My mother is another worry. At 76, we fear the toll this ordeal might take on her. She's currently unaware of the kidney cancer diagnosis. We've decided not to tell her until after the surgery.

@dsh33782 Thank you for sharing that. Our appointment with the urologist is this Friday. We don't know yet which treatment will be the first, rectal or kidney cancer. It is stage 1 and I don't know if it is gonna be partial nephrectomy or full nephrectomy. Unfortunately, my father also has stage 3 kidney disease. He has been on pill for about 6 years. Is there anything in your mind that I should ask to the doctor?

Thank you both.

REPLY
@mrt2024

I am going to ask to doctor pros and cons if this procedure applicable to my father. I would like to hear if you had unexpected challenges or complications during your recovery period.

Jump to this post

The two-stage Turnbull-Cutait consists of two surgeries. The first one is the longest (3 to 4 hours, although mine was 5, because I also needed a vaginal flap); the second one is done 5 to 7 days later, for the coloanal anastomosis and takes 1 hour. I got bloated with the pre-op prep (like the prep for a colonoscopy) and for some unexpected reason, I remained bloated, so much so that my intestine was paralyzed, but this is extremely rare.
Recovery is slow, as for any low anterior resection (LAR).
Talk about LARS with the surgeon, since it is often present after a LAR. In the case of a temporary colostomy, LARS will occur after the reconnection.

REPLY
@mrt2024

It's truly overwhelming to absorb everything. I'm grateful that I'm not facing this alone; my three sisters and mom are all here to support my father. My father seems okay if he is not pretending. That's a relief. However, my oldest sister's pessimism weighs heavily on us. Despite my efforts to share survival statistics and details with her, she remains unconvinced. We make an effort to maintain a cheerful atmosphere around my father, but her attitude makes it challenging.

I'm trying to understand her feelings, but we all need strength to cope. Our conversations have prompted me to delve into the possibility of recurrence. Questions flood my mind: Will it return, and when? The odds of recurrence within five years are around 28%. Is it inevitable? He is 66 now. If it recurs in a decade or earlier, could it metastasize? Will he endure chemotherapy and surgeries again? Will his suffering be severe?

Even though it is difficult, I don't want to dwell on these uncertainties, I want to focus on the present. I hope for his successful treatment with minimal side effects and complications. However, maintaining optimism can sometimes be challenging.

My mother is another worry. At 76, we fear the toll this ordeal might take on her. She's currently unaware of the kidney cancer diagnosis. We've decided not to tell her until after the surgery.

@dsh33782 Thank you for sharing that. Our appointment with the urologist is this Friday. We don't know yet which treatment will be the first, rectal or kidney cancer. It is stage 1 and I don't know if it is gonna be partial nephrectomy or full nephrectomy. Unfortunately, my father also has stage 3 kidney disease. He has been on pill for about 6 years. Is there anything in your mind that I should ask to the doctor?

Thank you both.

Jump to this post

@mrt2024
I understand your concern about recurrance. I also worry about it, but am now very encouraged that treatments are available and seem to work well. After partial removal of right kidney, my kidney functions are working normally now.
And although the side affects were rough during chemo and radiation for esophageal cancer, I survived at age 78 and am felling well now. I hope you can encourage you father to look for brighter future after treatment. I hope your visit with urologist goes well, and you can learn what the recommended plan is and feel comfortable with it. I'll be interested to hear what you learn?

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.