Questions regarding total hip replacement
Hi, I would appreciate any feedback. My left hip joint is totally collapsed and has been for about 4 years. For some reason, I do not have pain. However, the collapse has left my leg shorter and has forced me to be heavily dependent on a cane. I've seen 4 orthopedic surgeons over the years and have gotten varying suggestions. One said not to get THR because I have no pain. Another said he could do it with anterior approach but it would require a lot of cutting, etc., and probably not be the best result. The third said he uses anterolateral approach but he had never seen a collapsed hip without pain. He said that the surgery would be a success but he didn't think I would be happy with the outcome because of possible damage to already weak muscles. The 4th said that he would do it with a posterior approach (is there only one type of posterior approach?) that he thought would give me the least damage. I'm 65 and would like to again enjoy some active years without a cane. I've read that hip surgeries are among the most successful but I get scared when I read forums. My friends remind me that people who have successful THRs don't usually get into forums because they don't have problems. Is that right? Or is the marketing for THRs not mentioning the infections, etc., that come afterward? And how/why do these infections occur? I want to move on with my life but I don't want to exchange a very inconvenient limp/cane for pain and problems. Am I just being a worrywart or ? Thanks for any thoughts.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Joint Replacements Support Group.
Connect

@steveinarizona I agree with the experience. “ Joshua Carothers, MD, is a board-certified and fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon, specializing in total joint hip and knee surgery. He joins CHRISTUS St. Vincent with more than 14 years of experience and has completed more 10,000 total joint surgeries.”
Also, he had a great video posted explaining in detail what a hip or knee replacement entailed. What sealed the deal was that I couldn’t find one bad thing about him in my online searching. He was great as was my experience from start to finish.
@kildaren96 I agree. The left hip was posterior approach and the right was anterior. The anterior was far worse and the incision much larger. Two different doctors and two different outcomes. I am set to go to a revision surgeon as the right hip 14 months out has never healed. Best bet is gaining a knowledgeable, experienced surgeon more than the approach.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI am so sorry that the anterior hip replacement didn’t do well and hope that the revision will fix the problem(s). Even the talk with the docs who do posterior said that the best procedure is by an experienced physician in the format that they are trained in and experienced in doing whether anterior, posterior or the side thing…which again, my posterior surgery was done by going in the side of my hip but my doctor said specifically that that it was posterior surgery. Maybe all posterior surgery goes into the side but the hip is accessed from the back. Sending you healing thoughts!