Prostate cancer diagnosis on March 6

Posted by alanrittel @alanrittel, Mar 22 4:58pm

Had prostrate cancer diagnosis on 3/6/2026. Urology oncologist took 12 samples. Eleven were benign and one was determined to be cancer. Left mid gland transition zone, Gleason score 3+4 (group 2), tumor involves one of one cores and measures 1 mm in length. Pattern 4 = 30%. Met with Dr. and she is fine with active surveillance for now. She is having an urology radiation oncologist and a dr. that does focal therapy contact me. I am 75 years old. Am wondering if focal therapy could be the correct treatment. Not sure if Medicare will pay all costs. Wonder what others with similar diagnosis did?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

Focal therapy can work with the apparent early case that You have. It is not always successful, but it has a high satisfaction rate. Medicare will cover various types of focal therapy.

Active surveillance may make sense. Definitely get checked out in six months. 30% of a four is a little bit high.

Here’s some more information on active surveillance.

Here is a video with Dr. Laurence Klotz, one of the experts on active surveillance. He can give you answers as to why you would or would not be a good candidate for active surveillance.


Here is a video by Dr. Epstein discussing active surveillance and more

Excellent Fred Hutch doctor video: Dr. Claire de la Calle

Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer w/ Dr. Claire de la Calle | Ep. 288

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc

Also I live near Colorado Springs and my dr. works for CU Health. She is getting CU Health Anschutz clinic located by Denver to do a consult on focal therapy. Our daughter lives near Kansas City and we may also consult with KU Medical Center.

REPLY

Looks like you are a good candidate for focal therapy. This is by far the best treatment to minimize side effects both immediate and a few years out. Focal therapy may not be an option if the lesion gets worse after a few years of AS. Even if there is a recurrence there is a good chance that AS can be used at that time for the new lesion.

REPLY
Profile picture for alanrittel @alanrittel

@mtnman

Am very happy for you. This gives me more optimism.

Jump to this post

@alanrittel
I still remember when my wife and I went back to the urologist when the biopsy results came back. It's a gut punch.

Today I really have to remind myself that I had cancer and can now say I am cancer-free. Dealing with other age-related issues, but this one is far in the past.

REPLY

Really appreciate your experience and that you are in remission. Its very encouraging information.

REPLY
Profile picture for jim18 @jim18

Looks like you are a good candidate for focal therapy. This is by far the best treatment to minimize side effects both immediate and a few years out. Focal therapy may not be an option if the lesion gets worse after a few years of AS. Even if there is a recurrence there is a good chance that AS can be used at that time for the new lesion.

Jump to this post

@jim18

Appreciate your review of my situation and your seeing me as a candidate for focal therapy. This is the approach I am hoping will work for me. Now waiting for the drs. to set-up consults. My urology oncologist graduated in 2024 from MD Anderson Fellowship program. They only accept 5 drs a year into this program. So I feel very comfortable with the doctor's recommendations and treatment.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.