Possible Extracapsular Extension - How much influence on treatment(s)
60 years old
2022 - PSA increased from 2 or below to 2.8
2023 and 2024 - PSA remained 2.5-2.8
2025 - Annual Physical PSA = 4.0
-Urologist visit - nothing felt and prostate not enlarged
-4K test = 5.5 with PSA component=1.96
-September MRI showed a PI-RADS(5) lesion (2 x 1.2 x 1 cm). Appears to be "Extracapsular Extension". Prostate volume = 29.7 cm3 (not enlarged), PSA density 0.13ng/ml2 (at PSA of 4.0)
September Targeted Biopsy: 5 positive cores. All graded at 3+3 Gleason. One core involving 90% of tissue
-Local Urologist indicated Active Surveillance due to 3+3 rating.
-October 2025 transferred to City of Hope for 2nd opinion and to be at a Center of Excellence. Was able to quickly see one of the best Surgeon/Urologists in the Southeast and an incredible Radiation Oncologist.
-November Decipher score of 48
-November PSMA PET scan indicated no additional cancer. Only the (1) lesion shown on MRI
-(3) PSA tests in September, October, and November were between 2 and 2.8. The only test above 3 was the one test at 4.0 that led me to initial Urologist visit in July 2025.
Praying/Studying/Learning about possible treatment(s) in 2026.
Surgeon/Urologist is conflicted on his recommendation (Active Surveillance vs treatment)
-PSA is still low
-Gleason 3+3 is good for Active Surveillance
-PSMA PET scan shows cancer confined
-Decipher is not low, but not high
-Pi-Rads (5) lesion is concerning
-He suspects the lesion would grade higher than 3+3 if removed during RP
-Possible Extracapsular Extension is a concern
Radiologist is not pushing immediate treatment. However, decipher score and MRI concerned her enough, she was able to get insurance to cover the PSMA PET. Her experience indicates I am not a standard 3+3 active surveillance candidate. She agrees with surgeon. I have conflicting test information.
Some questions for the group:
1. For those with extracapsular extension who underwent RP, did surgeon remove alot more tissue on the side of the lesion to ensure negative margin? Did this eliminate possibility of nerve-sparing on the side of the lesion?
2. Did the extracapsular extension require both RP and radiation and possibly hormone?
3. I am confident, modern radiation can treat the lesion (at least for a time). My concern is at 60 years of age, how likely is the cancer to return in 5-10 years (after initial radiation).
4. Other thoughts/comments
Thank you so much for all you share.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@heavyphil
Thanks Phil. This is great information. I hesitated to make a post and ask questions. I am glad I did. You and others are providing great information and knowledge. Thank you so much.
Best Wishes.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@psychometric Hopefully, there was no escape before the RP was performed. A clear PSMA Pet scan and clear margins don't guarantee that no escape has already occurred. This post RP nomogram from MSK predicts the probability of remaining cancer recurrence-free at two, five, seven, and ten years following surgery. Using dynamic statistical formulas, this nomogram draws on data from more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients treated at MSK.
https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/post_op
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@wwsmith
Thanks for the link to the post RP survey. Great info.
I had Pi-RADS 5 at my first MRI to confirm cancer with two tumors and possible ECE.
After a second opinion at Mayo Rochester it was changed to one tumor at Pi-RADS 4 with ECE.
After my biopsy the projected Gleason was 8 (4+4). My PSMA PET/CT showed no spread.
I had a robotic prostatectomy with nerve sparing. All margins, lymph nodes, etc. were clear. Some extra tissue around the prostate was removed. I have no idea how much but it didn't sound significant.
One benefit of surgery is being able to run a pathology report. Mine came back as Gleason 7 (4+3) vs 8. This can aid in the determination of follow-up treatments. I am having no radiation at this point and will be doing my first PSA test in 3 weeks.
I preferred to start with surgery and follow up with radiation if required since they could properly stage my cancer and any radiation follow up would be more targeted with fewer negative side effects. Be sure to read up on them if considering radiation as you can have incontinence (urinary and bowel) and ED as delayed side effects. My surgeon has over 20 years of robotic prostatectomy experience and was not overly concerned with my ECE as it seemed confined to the surface of my prostate. My radiologist was quite comfortable with a surgical choice and my proposed surgeon. My incontinence and ED recovery are proceeding as predicted. As everyone will tell you, it is a complicated choice to make and many variables to consider and the stories of everyone in this group will vary significantly. Best of luck.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
9 Reactions@chuckb
Thank you. Very good information to discuss with surgeon. He has indicated the ECE during actual surgery is not as much as possibly-estimated on MRI.
Thank you for sharing.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@charlesprestridge Be aware that MSK also has a similar nomogram for those seeking odds of recurrence before they have an RP as seen here https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/pre_op
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@wwsmith
Thank you. Just completed the Pre-RP worksheet.
Thanks for sharing
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@wwsmith
Yeah, hopefully it hadn't wandered out of the area at that point but there's not much I can do about it now. The difference in the MSK nomogram's predicted probabilities between what my initial biopsy showed and my post-op pathology is substantial, especially at 10 years. I still have better odds than Lloyd Christmas so I'm adopting his positive attitude until proven otherwise!
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions