Possible Extracapsular Extension - How much influence on treatment(s)

Posted by charlesprestridge @charlesprestridge, 3 days ago

60 years old
2022 - PSA increased from 2 or below to 2.8
2023 and 2024 - PSA remained 2.5-2.8
2025 - Annual Physical PSA = 4.0
-Urologist visit - nothing felt and prostate not enlarged
-4K test = 5.5 with PSA component=1.96
-September MRI showed a PI-RADS(5) lesion (2 x 1.2 x 1 cm). Appears to be "Extracapsular Extension". Prostate volume = 29.7 cm3 (not enlarged), PSA density 0.13ng/ml2 (at PSA of 4.0)
September Targeted Biopsy: 5 positive cores. All graded at 3+3 Gleason. One core involving 90% of tissue
-Local Urologist indicated Active Surveillance due to 3+3 rating.
-October 2025 transferred to City of Hope for 2nd opinion and to be at a Center of Excellence. Was able to quickly see one of the best Surgeon/Urologists in the Southeast and an incredible Radiation Oncologist.
-November Decipher score of 48
-November PSMA PET scan indicated no additional cancer. Only the (1) lesion shown on MRI
-(3) PSA tests in September, October, and November were between 2 and 2.8. The only test above 3 was the one test at 4.0 that led me to initial Urologist visit in July 2025.

Praying/Studying/Learning about possible treatment(s) in 2026.

Surgeon/Urologist is conflicted on his recommendation (Active Surveillance vs treatment)
-PSA is still low
-Gleason 3+3 is good for Active Surveillance
-PSMA PET scan shows cancer confined
-Decipher is not low, but not high
-Pi-Rads (5) lesion is concerning
-He suspects the lesion would grade higher than 3+3 if removed during RP
-Possible Extracapsular Extension is a concern

Radiologist is not pushing immediate treatment. However, decipher score and MRI concerned her enough, she was able to get insurance to cover the PSMA PET. Her experience indicates I am not a standard 3+3 active surveillance candidate. She agrees with surgeon. I have conflicting test information.

Some questions for the group:
1. For those with extracapsular extension who underwent RP, did surgeon remove alot more tissue on the side of the lesion to ensure negative margin? Did this eliminate possibility of nerve-sparing on the side of the lesion?

2. Did the extracapsular extension require both RP and radiation and possibly hormone?

3. I am confident, modern radiation can treat the lesion (at least for a time). My concern is at 60 years of age, how likely is the cancer to return in 5-10 years (after initial radiation).

4. Other thoughts/comments

Thank you so much for all you share.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

I had ECE with extensive G4+3 - which yours is not, thank goodness. However, surgery revealed a ‘tiny’ break in the capsule, but margins were negative.
Got 5 years out of that until the cancer recurred and I underwent 25 sessions of IMRT (many acronyms for this!) with 6 months ADT.
I was 64 at the time of surgery.
Yours is a difficult decision, for sure, because of its ambiguity: not a lot of bad cells, but right in a critical spot!
Your treatment decision depends a lot on your personality type. I am a worrier, a pessimist and I always expect a train🫣.
So I opted for surgery - even though 2 RO’s assured me that SBRT would be successful… and it turned out to be a good bet as I was able to hit it a second time with radiation.
I would have worried constantly that my options would be limited if the cancer returned, had I chosen radiation as primary treatment.
But remember, my case was a lot worse than yours and perhaps HDR/IMRT is all you’ll ever need.
But the real question is this: is your less than 10% G4/ECE gonna keep you up at night worrying if you don’t have surgery? Or is worrying about incontinence and ED gonna worry you more and prompt you to choose radiation with fingers crossed?
Ultimately, any treatment you choose will have a comparable success level. But it’s your COMFORT LEVEL with your decision that is most important! You gotta be 110% ALL IN on whatever you choose and never, never, EVER look back with woulda/shoulda… Hope I haven’t confused you even more, but this is a very confusing subject to begin with!😉
Phil

Jump to this post

@heavyphil

Thanks Phil. This is great information. I hesitated to make a post and ask questions. I am glad I did. You and others are providing great information and knowledge. Thank you so much.

Best Wishes.

REPLY
Profile picture for psychometric @psychometric

I had RARP at the Cleveland Clinic in June at age 50. Initial biopsy Gleason 7 (3 + 4), 6/12 cores, PSA 6.68, Stage T1C, and Decipher 0.56. Pre-op PSMA showed no metastasis to lymph nodes or bones.

My pre-op MRI showed EPE so the surgeon had a sample tested during my surgery to help ensure negative margins but he was still able to spare nerves on that side. CC calls the procedure "intraoperative diagnosis" but it's also called NeuroSafe or frozen section.

My surgical margins and 15 lymph nodes were negative but the post-op pathology revealed large Cribriform pattern (< 10%), and suspicious IDC, which changed my staging to pT3b. So far, my PSA has been undetectable on the first two post-op tests.

Jump to this post

@psychometric Hopefully, there was no escape before the RP was performed. A clear PSMA Pet scan and clear margins don't guarantee that no escape has already occurred. This post RP nomogram from MSK predicts the probability of remaining cancer recurrence-free at two, five, seven, and ten years following surgery. Using dynamic statistical formulas, this nomogram draws on data from more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients treated at MSK.
https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/post_op

REPLY
Profile picture for wwsmith @wwsmith

@psychometric Hopefully, there was no escape before the RP was performed. A clear PSMA Pet scan and clear margins don't guarantee that no escape has already occurred. This post RP nomogram from MSK predicts the probability of remaining cancer recurrence-free at two, five, seven, and ten years following surgery. Using dynamic statistical formulas, this nomogram draws on data from more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients treated at MSK.
https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/post_op

Jump to this post

@wwsmith

Thanks for the link to the post RP survey. Great info.

REPLY

I had Pi-RADS 5 at my first MRI to confirm cancer with two tumors and possible ECE.
After a second opinion at Mayo Rochester it was changed to one tumor at Pi-RADS 4 with ECE.
After my biopsy the projected Gleason was 8 (4+4). My PSMA PET/CT showed no spread.
I had a robotic prostatectomy with nerve sparing. All margins, lymph nodes, etc. were clear. Some extra tissue around the prostate was removed. I have no idea how much but it didn't sound significant.
One benefit of surgery is being able to run a pathology report. Mine came back as Gleason 7 (4+3) vs 8. This can aid in the determination of follow-up treatments. I am having no radiation at this point and will be doing my first PSA test in 3 weeks.
I preferred to start with surgery and follow up with radiation if required since they could properly stage my cancer and any radiation follow up would be more targeted with fewer negative side effects. Be sure to read up on them if considering radiation as you can have incontinence (urinary and bowel) and ED as delayed side effects. My surgeon has over 20 years of robotic prostatectomy experience and was not overly concerned with my ECE as it seemed confined to the surface of my prostate. My radiologist was quite comfortable with a surgical choice and my proposed surgeon. My incontinence and ED recovery are proceeding as predicted. As everyone will tell you, it is a complicated choice to make and many variables to consider and the stories of everyone in this group will vary significantly. Best of luck.

REPLY
Profile picture for chuckb @chuckb

I had Pi-RADS 5 at my first MRI to confirm cancer with two tumors and possible ECE.
After a second opinion at Mayo Rochester it was changed to one tumor at Pi-RADS 4 with ECE.
After my biopsy the projected Gleason was 8 (4+4). My PSMA PET/CT showed no spread.
I had a robotic prostatectomy with nerve sparing. All margins, lymph nodes, etc. were clear. Some extra tissue around the prostate was removed. I have no idea how much but it didn't sound significant.
One benefit of surgery is being able to run a pathology report. Mine came back as Gleason 7 (4+3) vs 8. This can aid in the determination of follow-up treatments. I am having no radiation at this point and will be doing my first PSA test in 3 weeks.
I preferred to start with surgery and follow up with radiation if required since they could properly stage my cancer and any radiation follow up would be more targeted with fewer negative side effects. Be sure to read up on them if considering radiation as you can have incontinence (urinary and bowel) and ED as delayed side effects. My surgeon has over 20 years of robotic prostatectomy experience and was not overly concerned with my ECE as it seemed confined to the surface of my prostate. My radiologist was quite comfortable with a surgical choice and my proposed surgeon. My incontinence and ED recovery are proceeding as predicted. As everyone will tell you, it is a complicated choice to make and many variables to consider and the stories of everyone in this group will vary significantly. Best of luck.

Jump to this post

@chuckb

Thank you. Very good information to discuss with surgeon. He has indicated the ECE during actual surgery is not as much as possibly-estimated on MRI.

Thank you for sharing.

REPLY
Profile picture for charlesprestridge @charlesprestridge

@wwsmith

Thanks for the link to the post RP survey. Great info.

Jump to this post

@charlesprestridge Be aware that MSK also has a similar nomogram for those seeking odds of recurrence before they have an RP as seen here https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/pre_op

REPLY
Profile picture for wwsmith @wwsmith

@charlesprestridge Be aware that MSK also has a similar nomogram for those seeking odds of recurrence before they have an RP as seen here https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/pre_op

Jump to this post

@wwsmith

Thank you. Just completed the Pre-RP worksheet.

Thanks for sharing

REPLY
Profile picture for wwsmith @wwsmith

@psychometric Hopefully, there was no escape before the RP was performed. A clear PSMA Pet scan and clear margins don't guarantee that no escape has already occurred. This post RP nomogram from MSK predicts the probability of remaining cancer recurrence-free at two, five, seven, and ten years following surgery. Using dynamic statistical formulas, this nomogram draws on data from more than 10,000 prostate cancer patients treated at MSK.
https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/post_op

Jump to this post

@wwsmith

Yeah, hopefully it hadn't wandered out of the area at that point but there's not much I can do about it now. The difference in the MSK nomogram's predicted probabilities between what my initial biopsy showed and my post-op pathology is substantial, especially at 10 years. I still have better odds than Lloyd Christmas so I'm adopting his positive attitude until proven otherwise!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.