Newly diagnosed and looking for treatment advice.
Hi, everyone. I’m 66 years old and am newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. I currently have no continence or erectile dysfunction, I take no medications, and am healthy otherwise. I haven’t decided on a treatment yet. My cancer is localized to the gland and is low intermediate risk (3+4), so my options range from active surveillance to RP. I’d prefer a one and done treatment, and after lots of online research, I’m leaning towards SBRT. I’d like to avoid ADT if possible, but am worried by my high risk Decipher score of 0.81.
Also, I’ve heard of the Prostox test for predicting urinary problems years down the line from SBRT and IMRT. My radiation oncologist is reluctant to order it for me, because it’s not yet vetted by the FDA. From what I can gather, it’s a legitimate test and Dr. Scholz of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute(many of you are probably aware of PCRI- excellent you tube channel) has positive things to say about it. I am sexually active and still enjoy it, but I am more worried by chronic incontinence as I enjoy lots of outdoor activities.
I would appreciate advice from this community before I make a decision.
Thanks!
My stats:
>PSA 13 bounces up down between 9 and 14 for last few years
>MRI: A 2.2 cm PI-RADS 5 lesion posterior lateral left peripheral zone at the mid gland. An additional
0.6 cm PI-RADS 3 lesion right lateral peripheral zone at the mid gland. No pelvic metastatic disease
findings
>targeted biopsy report: A. Prostate, lesion 1, biopsy: Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Grade Group 2
(Gleason Score 3+4 = 7/10), in 3 of 3 cores, involving 45% of needle core by volume, Gleason pattern
4 comprises 15% of tumor volume. Perineural invasion is identified. B. Prostate, lesion 2, biopsy:
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Grade Group 1 (Gleason Score 3+3 = 6/10), in 1 of 3 cores, involving
5% of needle core by volume. Perineural invasion is not identified.
>Psma pet scan: Mildly tracer avid prostate malignancy. No definite tracer avid nodal or distant
metastases. Clinical stage T1c
>Decipher score .81 high risk
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
@jeffmarc
Thanks, I might do that.
@jeffmarc I did order another genetic test from your link and it has arrived. I did a Helix test back in 2020 just because my insurance offered it and it came back with zero issues so I am hoping the same for this next test
@ucfron
It’s not worth doing a hereditary test again. You will get the same results.
You could do a somatic test to see if your genetics have changed due to the cancer.
@jimgaudette It’s not necessarily about trust.
Both you and I were probably very good in our respective professions. But, we probably didn’t know everything (at least I didn’t). It’s no different with doctors (urologists, oncologists, etc.).
I always kept in mind that doctors (and medical teams) are human beings, not gods; they’re just people like you and me, working in an occupation they have an aptitude and passion for; but, they’re not perfect; they’re human, with human frailties; they sometimes make errors.
They also have lives to live outside of work, spouses and children to spend time with, vacations to take, student loans to pay off, and on and on and on……
And, they’re not always right; no one doctor knows everything; they only know as much as they’ve learned and experienced. Whatever they tell you, accept it with some cautious and informed skepticism (and optimism).
On a few occasions we changed my treatment plan based on my inputs (from what I heard and read others experience). In other instances they were able to explain to me why my recommendation was not optimal for my diagnosis.
That’s what self-advocacy and shared decision-making is all about. That’s how I worked with my medical team, and I think (hope?) it led to a better outcome.
Really comes down to what you’re comfortable with. I chose Tulsa (Mayo Rochester) at 65 years old for my 4+3. At 1 year I am cancer free. I know I have a long way to go but clinical data at 3 years out is showing Tulsa is right in the same ballpark as other treatments for recurrence. What sold me was all other options are still on the table if it returns. I liked the low risk of side effects as ED was not something my wife or I were ready for. My advice is do all the research, weigh the pro and cons, make the decision that is right for you, and never second guess that decision. Good luck.
@brianjarvis
Excellent insight!
@brianjarvis I totally agree. Our doctors are highly trained consultants, not gods and they need to be working with us, not simply telling us what to do. Cancer treatment is too varied and too important for us to not be involved in our treatment decisions. It is our body and our life. A year ago, I chose to go on intermittent ADT instead of continuous ADT because of the side effects. My radiation oncologist agreed with me, but my medical oncologist did not. FYI People on intermittent ADT are more likely to die of the cancer, but less likely to die of heart disease or other problems caused by the ADT. Life expectancy is actually about the same, but of course my medical oncologist was more focused on stopping or slowing the spread of the cancer. I have been off ADT for a year now and my PSA has remained “undetectable”, my blood pressure, red blood cell count and blood sugar have normalized. Earlier this week, my hot flashes improved significantly. I will of course go right back on ADT as soon as my PSA goes up.
@jcf58 I seriously considered TULSA-Pro. I was also told other treatments are still an option if you have a reoccurrence, but I think that only includes radiation. I am curious what others have heard about surgery after TULSA-Pro.
@ucfron
Yes, surgery is a possible future option after a TULSA-PRO treatment, especially if the treatment was focal, but it is generally not recommended due to the increased risks of scarring and complications like incontinence and erectile dysfunction.
TULSA-PRO is designed to keep future treatment options open and is often chosen to avoid the potential side effects of traditional surgery. If a recurrence occurs, repeat TULSA-PRO or salvage surgery are potential alternatives, but surgery after TULSA-PRO carries significant risks due to scar tissue formation.
Hi,
If you have a pirads 5 and Gleason 7 just get the surgery and get rid of it. You are definitely at greater risk for the cancer spreading outside the prostate. I had a Gleason 6 for 6 years and pirads 5. Did active surveillance and all of a sudden the tumor started to invade the urethra so decided to get it out. The most important thing is to get a surgeon who’s done thousands of surgeries and make sure it’s done robotically. Thank God have had no problems with incontinence. I can get an erection but not as hard but told it takes a while. Am 9 months out. Orgasms dry but still pleasurable. Hope this helps.