Newly diagnosed and looking for treatment advice.

Posted by quaddick @quaddick, Sep 23 12:19pm

Hi, everyone. I’m 66 years old and am newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. I currently have no continence or erectile dysfunction, I take no medications, and am healthy otherwise. I haven’t decided on a treatment yet. My cancer is localized to the gland and is low intermediate risk (3+4), so my options range from active surveillance to RP. I’d prefer a one and done treatment, and after lots of online research, I’m leaning towards SBRT. I’d like to avoid ADT if possible, but am worried by my high risk Decipher score of 0.81.
Also, I’ve heard of the Prostox test for predicting urinary problems years down the line from SBRT and IMRT. My radiation oncologist is reluctant to order it for me, because it’s not yet vetted by the FDA. From what I can gather, it’s a legitimate test and Dr. Scholz of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute(many of you are probably aware of PCRI- excellent you tube channel) has positive things to say about it. I am sexually active and still enjoy it, but I am more worried by chronic incontinence as I enjoy lots of outdoor activities.
I would appreciate advice from this community before I make a decision.
Thanks!

My stats:
>PSA 13 bounces up down between 9 and 14 for last few years
>MRI: A 2.2 cm PI-RADS 5 lesion posterior lateral left peripheral zone at the mid gland. An additional
0.6 cm PI-RADS 3 lesion right lateral peripheral zone at the mid gland. No pelvic metastatic disease
findings
>targeted biopsy report: A. Prostate, lesion 1, biopsy: Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Grade Group 2
(Gleason Score 3+4 = 7/10), in 3 of 3 cores, involving 45% of needle core by volume, Gleason pattern
4 comprises 15% of tumor volume. Perineural invasion is identified. B. Prostate, lesion 2, biopsy:
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Grade Group 1 (Gleason Score 3+3 = 6/10), in 1 of 3 cores, involving
5% of needle core by volume. Perineural invasion is not identified.
>Psma pet scan: Mildly tracer avid prostate malignancy. No definite tracer avid nodal or distant
metastases. Clinical stage T1c
>Decipher score .81 high risk

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@ucfron
I have my prostate removed at 62. Recovered very quickly and was actually back at work in four days just on a very light schedule until the 8th day When I was able to work full-time. Since I spent most of my time helping people with computer problems, it didn’t require any physical exertion.

Because I had it at 62 and was relatively young for prostate cancer I had genetic testing about five years ago, 10 Years after surgery. I found out I have BRCA2 Which is the reason I’ve had four reoccurrences since 2010. Nowadays, they want you to have genetic testing earlier to make sure there’s not a genetic problem. Did any of your relatives have cancer breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer are all signs that it could be genetic

You can get hereditary genetic testing? Has it been offered to you by a doctor? You can get it done free with the below link, if you live in the United States. Do not check the box that you want your doctor involved or they won’t send you the kit until they get in contact with your doctor. It takes about three weeks to get the results and then a genetic counselor will call you.
`
Prostatecancerpromise.org

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc
Thanks, I might do that.

REPLY
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@ucfron
I have my prostate removed at 62. Recovered very quickly and was actually back at work in four days just on a very light schedule until the 8th day When I was able to work full-time. Since I spent most of my time helping people with computer problems, it didn’t require any physical exertion.

Because I had it at 62 and was relatively young for prostate cancer I had genetic testing about five years ago, 10 Years after surgery. I found out I have BRCA2 Which is the reason I’ve had four reoccurrences since 2010. Nowadays, they want you to have genetic testing earlier to make sure there’s not a genetic problem. Did any of your relatives have cancer breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer are all signs that it could be genetic

You can get hereditary genetic testing? Has it been offered to you by a doctor? You can get it done free with the below link, if you live in the United States. Do not check the box that you want your doctor involved or they won’t send you the kit until they get in contact with your doctor. It takes about three weeks to get the results and then a genetic counselor will call you.
`
Prostatecancerpromise.org

Jump to this post

@jeffmarc I did order another genetic test from your link and it has arrived. I did a Helix test back in 2020 just because my insurance offered it and it came back with zero issues so I am hoping the same for this next test

REPLY
Profile picture for WingNut @ucfron

@jeffmarc I did order another genetic test from your link and it has arrived. I did a Helix test back in 2020 just because my insurance offered it and it came back with zero issues so I am hoping the same for this next test

Jump to this post

@ucfron
It’s not worth doing a hereditary test again. You will get the same results.

You could do a somatic test to see if your genetics have changed due to the cancer.

REPLY
Profile picture for jimgaudette @jimgaudette

If you trust your oncologist, do what he/she says. If you don’t trust him/her, find another oncologist. This is a long term relationship, so make sure you make a good choice. That said, you can get a lot of good questions to ask your doctor on this site.

Jump to this post

@jimgaudette It’s not necessarily about trust.
Both you and I were probably very good in our respective professions. But, we probably didn’t know everything (at least I didn’t). It’s no different with doctors (urologists, oncologists, etc.).

I always kept in mind that doctors (and medical teams) are human beings, not gods; they’re just people like you and me, working in an occupation they have an aptitude and passion for; but, they’re not perfect; they’re human, with human frailties; they sometimes make errors.

They also have lives to live outside of work, spouses and children to spend time with, vacations to take, student loans to pay off, and on and on and on……

And, they’re not always right; no one doctor knows everything; they only know as much as they’ve learned and experienced. Whatever they tell you, accept it with some cautious and informed skepticism (and optimism).

On a few occasions we changed my treatment plan based on my inputs (from what I heard and read others experience). In other instances they were able to explain to me why my recommendation was not optimal for my diagnosis.

That’s what self-advocacy and shared decision-making is all about. That’s how I worked with my medical team, and I think (hope?) it led to a better outcome.

REPLY
Profile picture for WingNut @ucfron

I am 62 years old healthy and very sexually actuve. PSA jumps between 4.5 and 3.2. MRI in April showed PIRAD 5 Lession approx 2.2 cm in the inner transitional zone. 13 core biopsy confirmed one core, 70% of core 3+4 with 10% being 4. One other core in different area showed 3+3 in only 10% of core. Had second opinion at Moffit in Tampa which matched exactly. Had CT and PSMA PET with both showing all confined to prostate only where identified. I did several AI tests that evaluated my biopsy. Decipher was not one. I Can’t remember some of the names but one was to determine if I was a good candidate for AS. That came back with a 42 and 49 and below says your ok for AS. AS doesn’t excite me though so I think I want treatment. One test described the chances of Metastification over a 10 year period and the need for ADT. This came back showing that I only had a 7% chance of Mets after one modal treatment and no need for ADT. Last test was Prostox which said I had a 95% chance of urinary toxicity (Grade 2) after SBRT and only a 5% chance after IMRT. This eliminated SBRT for me. I started out wanting a RAPP and it out of my body, but then got scared about ED and incontenece by reading blogs, so I started looking elsewhere. I had meetings with several different Drs and different facilities about focal theories and most said I was not a great candidate due to the size of my lession. Met with both Mayo and Sceonnti about TULSA Pro and was exited I found what I was looking for, but Mayo Dr said it would be his second option behind RAPP and chances were good if I did TULSA it would reoccur sometime later. Well after 7 mos of reading, visiting 3 different centers including Mayo and Moffit, and talking with 9 different Onocology / Drs, I think I’ve decided on removal, and I’m trying to schedule it with Dr Ram at Mayo for later this year. It does scare the crap out of me, but I think that would be the best to move forward. I guess I’ll pray for the best regarding ED and incontenence but will just live with it if it occurs. I chose RAPP due to salvage opportunities if/when it reoccurs and because success is easy to measure since PSA should be zero or close to it. I also feel I’m young and healthy now and can overcome surgery better today then I could 7-10 years from now. I really just want this shit out of my body and will face the other consequences that arise. It took me a long time to get to this point but I think I am ready to do it. I have a beautiful strong and loving wife to help me, and great family of support. Interested to hear everyone’s opinion if they were in my shoes.

Jump to this post

Really comes down to what you’re comfortable with. I chose Tulsa (Mayo Rochester) at 65 years old for my 4+3. At 1 year I am cancer free. I know I have a long way to go but clinical data at 3 years out is showing Tulsa is right in the same ballpark as other treatments for recurrence. What sold me was all other options are still on the table if it returns. I liked the low risk of side effects as ED was not something my wife or I were ready for. My advice is do all the research, weigh the pro and cons, make the decision that is right for you, and never second guess that decision. Good luck.

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@jimgaudette It’s not necessarily about trust.
Both you and I were probably very good in our respective professions. But, we probably didn’t know everything (at least I didn’t). It’s no different with doctors (urologists, oncologists, etc.).

I always kept in mind that doctors (and medical teams) are human beings, not gods; they’re just people like you and me, working in an occupation they have an aptitude and passion for; but, they’re not perfect; they’re human, with human frailties; they sometimes make errors.

They also have lives to live outside of work, spouses and children to spend time with, vacations to take, student loans to pay off, and on and on and on……

And, they’re not always right; no one doctor knows everything; they only know as much as they’ve learned and experienced. Whatever they tell you, accept it with some cautious and informed skepticism (and optimism).

On a few occasions we changed my treatment plan based on my inputs (from what I heard and read others experience). In other instances they were able to explain to me why my recommendation was not optimal for my diagnosis.

That’s what self-advocacy and shared decision-making is all about. That’s how I worked with my medical team, and I think (hope?) it led to a better outcome.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis
Excellent insight!

REPLY
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@jimgaudette It’s not necessarily about trust.
Both you and I were probably very good in our respective professions. But, we probably didn’t know everything (at least I didn’t). It’s no different with doctors (urologists, oncologists, etc.).

I always kept in mind that doctors (and medical teams) are human beings, not gods; they’re just people like you and me, working in an occupation they have an aptitude and passion for; but, they’re not perfect; they’re human, with human frailties; they sometimes make errors.

They also have lives to live outside of work, spouses and children to spend time with, vacations to take, student loans to pay off, and on and on and on……

And, they’re not always right; no one doctor knows everything; they only know as much as they’ve learned and experienced. Whatever they tell you, accept it with some cautious and informed skepticism (and optimism).

On a few occasions we changed my treatment plan based on my inputs (from what I heard and read others experience). In other instances they were able to explain to me why my recommendation was not optimal for my diagnosis.

That’s what self-advocacy and shared decision-making is all about. That’s how I worked with my medical team, and I think (hope?) it led to a better outcome.

Jump to this post

@brianjarvis I totally agree. Our doctors are highly trained consultants, not gods and they need to be working with us, not simply telling us what to do. Cancer treatment is too varied and too important for us to not be involved in our treatment decisions. It is our body and our life. A year ago, I chose to go on intermittent ADT instead of continuous ADT because of the side effects. My radiation oncologist agreed with me, but my medical oncologist did not. FYI People on intermittent ADT are more likely to die of the cancer, but less likely to die of heart disease or other problems caused by the ADT. Life expectancy is actually about the same, but of course my medical oncologist was more focused on stopping or slowing the spread of the cancer. I have been off ADT for a year now and my PSA has remained “undetectable”, my blood pressure, red blood cell count and blood sugar have normalized. Earlier this week, my hot flashes improved significantly. I will of course go right back on ADT as soon as my PSA goes up.

REPLY
Profile picture for jcf58 @jcf58

Really comes down to what you’re comfortable with. I chose Tulsa (Mayo Rochester) at 65 years old for my 4+3. At 1 year I am cancer free. I know I have a long way to go but clinical data at 3 years out is showing Tulsa is right in the same ballpark as other treatments for recurrence. What sold me was all other options are still on the table if it returns. I liked the low risk of side effects as ED was not something my wife or I were ready for. My advice is do all the research, weigh the pro and cons, make the decision that is right for you, and never second guess that decision. Good luck.

Jump to this post

@jcf58 I seriously considered TULSA-Pro. I was also told other treatments are still an option if you have a reoccurrence, but I think that only includes radiation. I am curious what others have heard about surgery after TULSA-Pro.

REPLY
Profile picture for WingNut @ucfron

@jcf58 I seriously considered TULSA-Pro. I was also told other treatments are still an option if you have a reoccurrence, but I think that only includes radiation. I am curious what others have heard about surgery after TULSA-Pro.

Jump to this post

@ucfron
Yes, surgery is a possible future option after a TULSA-PRO treatment, especially if the treatment was focal, but it is generally not recommended due to the increased risks of scarring and complications like incontinence and erectile dysfunction.
TULSA-PRO is designed to keep future treatment options open and is often chosen to avoid the potential side effects of traditional surgery. If a recurrence occurs, repeat TULSA-PRO or salvage surgery are potential alternatives, but surgery after TULSA-PRO carries significant risks due to scar tissue formation.

REPLY

Hi,
If you have a pirads 5 and Gleason 7 just get the surgery and get rid of it. You are definitely at greater risk for the cancer spreading outside the prostate. I had a Gleason 6 for 6 years and pirads 5. Did active surveillance and all of a sudden the tumor started to invade the urethra so decided to get it out. The most important thing is to get a surgeon who’s done thousands of surgeries and make sure it’s done robotically. Thank God have had no problems with incontinence. I can get an erection but not as hard but told it takes a while. Am 9 months out. Orgasms dry but still pleasurable. Hope this helps.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.